土壤保持政策分析:以德国和孟加拉国为例

Mohammed Nasir Uddin Muluken, Elias Adamseged, Helen Tabot
{"title":"土壤保持政策分析:以德国和孟加拉国为例","authors":"Mohammed Nasir Uddin Muluken, Elias Adamseged, Helen Tabot","doi":"10.18999/BULITV.9.81","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Based on case study through literature review, the paper was to focus mainly to analyze soil conservation policies using the Institutions of Sustainability (IoS) framework. Germany and Bangladesh were considered as study area of the paper. Although both countries are initiating conservation policies to mitigate the problems, the degree of sustainability varies from one country to the other. Among the policies, at least the incentive-based policy of agri-environmental schemes are successful and sustainable in Brandenburg even after the termination of the program. These schemes help raise farmers’ awareness of soil degradation problems through information distribution and learning processes. Apparently, lack of awareness of the problem among farmers is the first barrier to policy implementation. Obligatory policies such as the Nitrate Directive of Germany and the Fertiliser Regulation Guide of Bangladesh seem promising in achieving greater impacts. However these impacts can be achieved only when the policies are backed with effective and efficient governance structures that can be able to implement, monitor and evaluate the progress as well as sanction defaulters. Combinations of voluntary and obligatory policies across different sectors are necessary for desire result.","PeriodicalId":154366,"journal":{"name":"Vocational and Technical Education","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of Soil Conservation Policies : A Case Study of Germany and Bangladesh\",\"authors\":\"Mohammed Nasir Uddin Muluken, Elias Adamseged, Helen Tabot\",\"doi\":\"10.18999/BULITV.9.81\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Based on case study through literature review, the paper was to focus mainly to analyze soil conservation policies using the Institutions of Sustainability (IoS) framework. Germany and Bangladesh were considered as study area of the paper. Although both countries are initiating conservation policies to mitigate the problems, the degree of sustainability varies from one country to the other. Among the policies, at least the incentive-based policy of agri-environmental schemes are successful and sustainable in Brandenburg even after the termination of the program. These schemes help raise farmers’ awareness of soil degradation problems through information distribution and learning processes. Apparently, lack of awareness of the problem among farmers is the first barrier to policy implementation. Obligatory policies such as the Nitrate Directive of Germany and the Fertiliser Regulation Guide of Bangladesh seem promising in achieving greater impacts. However these impacts can be achieved only when the policies are backed with effective and efficient governance structures that can be able to implement, monitor and evaluate the progress as well as sanction defaulters. Combinations of voluntary and obligatory policies across different sectors are necessary for desire result.\",\"PeriodicalId\":154366,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vocational and Technical Education\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vocational and Technical Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18999/BULITV.9.81\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vocational and Technical Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18999/BULITV.9.81","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在文献综述的基础上,以案例研究为基础,重点运用可持续性制度(IoS)框架对土壤保持政策进行分析。德国和孟加拉国被认为是本文的研究领域。尽管两国都在启动保护政策以缓解这些问题,但可持续性的程度因国而异。在这些政策中,至少以激励为基础的农业环境计划政策在勃兰登堡是成功的,即使在计划终止后也是可持续的。这些计划通过信息分发和学习过程帮助农民提高对土壤退化问题的认识。显然,农民对这个问题缺乏认识是政策实施的第一个障碍。强制性政策,如德国的硝酸盐指令和孟加拉国的肥料管理指南,似乎有望产生更大的影响。然而,这些影响只有在政策得到有效和高效的治理结构的支持时才能实现,这些治理结构能够实施、监测和评估进展以及制裁违约者。不同部门之间的自愿性和强制性政策的结合是实现预期结果的必要条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analysis of Soil Conservation Policies : A Case Study of Germany and Bangladesh
Based on case study through literature review, the paper was to focus mainly to analyze soil conservation policies using the Institutions of Sustainability (IoS) framework. Germany and Bangladesh were considered as study area of the paper. Although both countries are initiating conservation policies to mitigate the problems, the degree of sustainability varies from one country to the other. Among the policies, at least the incentive-based policy of agri-environmental schemes are successful and sustainable in Brandenburg even after the termination of the program. These schemes help raise farmers’ awareness of soil degradation problems through information distribution and learning processes. Apparently, lack of awareness of the problem among farmers is the first barrier to policy implementation. Obligatory policies such as the Nitrate Directive of Germany and the Fertiliser Regulation Guide of Bangladesh seem promising in achieving greater impacts. However these impacts can be achieved only when the policies are backed with effective and efficient governance structures that can be able to implement, monitor and evaluate the progress as well as sanction defaulters. Combinations of voluntary and obligatory policies across different sectors are necessary for desire result.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信