资本主义世界市场中的社会生产

Paul Cammack
{"title":"资本主义世界市场中的社会生产","authors":"Paul Cammack","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780192847867.003.0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter sets out Marx’s ‘general law of social production’ and addresses its implications for the world of work and for gender, household, and family relations. Marx and Engels understood production to include the production of life itself and of individuals from day to day. At the same time, they thought that the development of industry on a global scale would transform social relations in ways that previous forms of production did not, as technological innovation led to increased division of labour and demanded versatile, flexible, and mobile workers. They were acutely attentive to the impact of these changes on families and households, but in their own lifetimes this was relatively limited. A comparison between gender relations, families, and households in their day and today shows how these have been transformed as capitalism has developed, and suggests, contrary to the arguments of some ‘social reproduction’ theorists, that capital tends without limit to penetrate and transform the ‘domestic sphere’. As women enter the labour market in increased numbers, they postpone or reject childbearing, while the ‘male breadwinner’ and the ‘nuclear family’ become increasingly uncommon. The proponents of the politics of global competitiveness embrace these changes, as they make for more competitive labour markets and a larger and more productive workforce.","PeriodicalId":273362,"journal":{"name":"The Politics of Global Competitiveness","volume":"89 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Social Production in a Capitalist World Market\",\"authors\":\"Paul Cammack\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/oso/9780192847867.003.0002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This chapter sets out Marx’s ‘general law of social production’ and addresses its implications for the world of work and for gender, household, and family relations. Marx and Engels understood production to include the production of life itself and of individuals from day to day. At the same time, they thought that the development of industry on a global scale would transform social relations in ways that previous forms of production did not, as technological innovation led to increased division of labour and demanded versatile, flexible, and mobile workers. They were acutely attentive to the impact of these changes on families and households, but in their own lifetimes this was relatively limited. A comparison between gender relations, families, and households in their day and today shows how these have been transformed as capitalism has developed, and suggests, contrary to the arguments of some ‘social reproduction’ theorists, that capital tends without limit to penetrate and transform the ‘domestic sphere’. As women enter the labour market in increased numbers, they postpone or reject childbearing, while the ‘male breadwinner’ and the ‘nuclear family’ become increasingly uncommon. The proponents of the politics of global competitiveness embrace these changes, as they make for more competitive labour markets and a larger and more productive workforce.\",\"PeriodicalId\":273362,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Politics of Global Competitiveness\",\"volume\":\"89 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Politics of Global Competitiveness\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192847867.003.0002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Politics of Global Competitiveness","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192847867.003.0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本章阐述了马克思的“社会生产的一般规律”,并阐述了它对劳动世界、性别、家庭和家庭关系的影响。马克思和恩格斯把生产理解为包括生活本身和个人的日常生产。与此同时,他们认为全球规模的工业发展将改变社会关系,这是以前的生产形式所没有的,因为技术创新导致了劳动分工的增加,需要多才多艺、灵活和流动的工人。他们非常关注这些变化对家庭和家庭的影响,但在他们自己的有生之年,这种关注相对有限。性别关系、家庭和家庭在他们的时代和今天之间的比较显示了这些是如何随着资本主义的发展而改变的,并表明,与一些“社会再生产”理论家的论点相反,资本倾向于无限制地渗透和改变“家庭领域”。随着越来越多的女性进入劳动力市场,她们推迟或拒绝生育,而“男性养家糊口”和“核心家庭”变得越来越罕见。全球竞争力政治的支持者欣然接受这些变化,因为它们会带来更具竞争力的劳动力市场,以及规模更大、生产率更高的劳动力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Social Production in a Capitalist World Market
This chapter sets out Marx’s ‘general law of social production’ and addresses its implications for the world of work and for gender, household, and family relations. Marx and Engels understood production to include the production of life itself and of individuals from day to day. At the same time, they thought that the development of industry on a global scale would transform social relations in ways that previous forms of production did not, as technological innovation led to increased division of labour and demanded versatile, flexible, and mobile workers. They were acutely attentive to the impact of these changes on families and households, but in their own lifetimes this was relatively limited. A comparison between gender relations, families, and households in their day and today shows how these have been transformed as capitalism has developed, and suggests, contrary to the arguments of some ‘social reproduction’ theorists, that capital tends without limit to penetrate and transform the ‘domestic sphere’. As women enter the labour market in increased numbers, they postpone or reject childbearing, while the ‘male breadwinner’ and the ‘nuclear family’ become increasingly uncommon. The proponents of the politics of global competitiveness embrace these changes, as they make for more competitive labour markets and a larger and more productive workforce.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信