Roland Lysell
{"title":"Hedda Gabler","authors":"Roland Lysell","doi":"10.54797/tfl.v51i3-4.1684","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Hedda Gabler: A Woman's Will to Power\nHedda Gabler (1890) is the eighth of Henrik Ibsen’s twelve social plays from The Pillars of Society (1877) to When We Dead Awaken (1899). Most critics and stage directors construe it as a play in the realist tradition and as a pièce bien faite. In this essay, I argue for a different kind of interpretation based on the important studies of the play by Else Høst, John Northam and Brian Johnston. Like Høst, I start with the protagonist’s (Hedda’s) comments about vine leaves in Ejlert Løvborg’s (her former suitor’s) hair. Through these comments, Hedda can be associated to the wineleaves of Emperor Julian in Ibsen’s Emperor and Galilean (1873), where the protagonists Julian and Maximos, a kind of mystic, discuss a utopian realm built on both the Dionysic Greek and the Christian mystical tradition. Hedda is a late follower of this mysticism. In this essay, I emphasize the existential aspect of Hedda’s searching for authentic values.\nI consider Hedda as an outsider, although she is involved in a fight for power, just as the other characters are. The other characters are described in detail and their actions are fully understandable, whereas Hedda’s character lacks determination. We do not know why she married Tesman. We do not know if she is pregnant. We do not know why she sets fire to Løvborg’s manuscript. Jealousy is too weak an explanation. Whereas the other characters search for the lukewarm indifference of everyday life, Hedda aims at the magnificent and the impossible. She represents the indeterminate aspect of the play, she is the character which does not fit into the realist structure, the character looking beyond and above the other characters, the character open to completely different interpretations, also on stage. Through her suicide she motivates the reader and the spectator to reflect on the metaphysical aspects of life.","PeriodicalId":202881,"journal":{"name":"Tidskrift för litteraturvetenskap","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tidskrift för litteraturvetenskap","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54797/tfl.v51i3-4.1684","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

《海达·盖博勒》(1890)是亨利克·易卜生从《社会的支柱》(1877)到《当我们死去醒来》(1899)共12部社会剧中的第八部。大多数评论家和舞台剧导演都把它看作是一部现实主义传统的戏剧,是一部忠实的作品。在本文中,我基于Else Høst、John Northam和Brian Johnston对该剧的重要研究,提出了一种不同的解释。和《Høst》一样,我从主角(Hedda)对Ejlert Løvborg(她的前追求者)头发上的藤蔓叶子的评论开始。通过这些评论,海达可以与易卜生的《皇帝与伽利略》(1873)中朱利安皇帝的酒叶联系起来,在那里,主角朱利安和马克西姆斯,一种神秘主义者,讨论了一个建立在酒神希腊和基督教神秘主义传统之上的乌托邦王国。海达是这种神秘主义的后期追随者。在这篇文章中,我强调了海达寻找真实价值的存在主义方面。我认为Hedda是一个局外人,尽管她和其他角色一样卷入了一场权力之争。其他角色都有详细的描述,他们的行为是完全可以理解的,而Hedda的角色缺乏决心。我们不知道她为什么嫁给了泰斯曼。我们不知道她是否怀孕了。我们不知道她为什么要烧掉洛弗伯格的手稿。嫉妒是一个站不住脚的解释。当其他角色寻找日常生活的冷淡冷漠时,海达的目标是宏伟和不可能。她代表了戏剧中不确定的一面,她是一个不符合现实主义结构的角色,一个超越其他角色的角色,一个在舞台上有完全不同诠释的角色。通过她的自杀,她激发了读者和观众对生命的形而上学方面的反思。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Hedda Gabler
Hedda Gabler: A Woman's Will to Power Hedda Gabler (1890) is the eighth of Henrik Ibsen’s twelve social plays from The Pillars of Society (1877) to When We Dead Awaken (1899). Most critics and stage directors construe it as a play in the realist tradition and as a pièce bien faite. In this essay, I argue for a different kind of interpretation based on the important studies of the play by Else Høst, John Northam and Brian Johnston. Like Høst, I start with the protagonist’s (Hedda’s) comments about vine leaves in Ejlert Løvborg’s (her former suitor’s) hair. Through these comments, Hedda can be associated to the wineleaves of Emperor Julian in Ibsen’s Emperor and Galilean (1873), where the protagonists Julian and Maximos, a kind of mystic, discuss a utopian realm built on both the Dionysic Greek and the Christian mystical tradition. Hedda is a late follower of this mysticism. In this essay, I emphasize the existential aspect of Hedda’s searching for authentic values. I consider Hedda as an outsider, although she is involved in a fight for power, just as the other characters are. The other characters are described in detail and their actions are fully understandable, whereas Hedda’s character lacks determination. We do not know why she married Tesman. We do not know if she is pregnant. We do not know why she sets fire to Løvborg’s manuscript. Jealousy is too weak an explanation. Whereas the other characters search for the lukewarm indifference of everyday life, Hedda aims at the magnificent and the impossible. She represents the indeterminate aspect of the play, she is the character which does not fit into the realist structure, the character looking beyond and above the other characters, the character open to completely different interpretations, also on stage. Through her suicide she motivates the reader and the spectator to reflect on the metaphysical aspects of life.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信