在指定的COVID-19医院进行紧急外科手术是否会延误?-马来西亚Sungai Buloh医院经验

Aroona S
{"title":"在指定的COVID-19医院进行紧急外科手术是否会延误?-马来西亚Sungai Buloh医院经验","authors":"Aroona S","doi":"10.16965/ijims.2021.114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The global pandemic Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS, CoV-2) is highly contagious and has driven many hospitals including Hospital Sungai Buloh (HSB) in Malaysia to become a designated hospital exclusively for COVID-19 patients only. These patients may develop complications requiring surgical consultation and intervention which have led to concerns regarding delay in the surgical management of these patients. Currently, there is a paucity of published data worldwide with regards to whether there is a delay in the time taken to perform the intended emergency procedure that has been planned by the attending surgical team. Method: This single-centered, retrospective study aims to investigate whether there is any delay in performing emergency surgical procedures during the COVID-19 pandemic in HSB from 1/3/2020 to 30/3/2021. All the cases were categorized based on recommended priority into acute emergency, emergency, and urgent. Results: There were a total of 105 patients; 5(4.8%) acute emergency cases, 22(21.0%) emergency cases, and 78 (74% cases) required an urgent intervention of which the majority had an endoscopic procedure performed i.e., 85.9% (67 cases) compared to surgery, 14.1% (11 cases). Patients in the emergency procedure category took the longest time to intervene whereby the median time taken was 548 minutes. 50% of patients in this category were delayed. Patients in the acute emergency category had delays seen in all 5 patients, with a median of 239 minutes. On the other hand, patients in the urgent category had only 10.3% of the patients who were delayed. Conclusion: From the total of 105 patients requiring emergency surgical intervention over 12 months period during the COVID-19 pandemic, the delay was seen in 24 patients (23% of cases). Multiple factors contributing to the delay have been postulated, pertaining to the implementation of the new Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) in managing COVID-19 patients in general, which needs to be verified with further study and addressed accordingly. KEYWORDS: Corona Virus Disease 2019, COVID-19 Pandemic, Emergency surgical intervention, Managing COVID-19 patients.","PeriodicalId":105328,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Integrative Medical Sciences","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is There a Delay in Emergency Surgical Procedures in a Designated COVID-19 Hospital? -The Hospital Sungai Buloh (Malaysia) Experience\",\"authors\":\"Aroona S\",\"doi\":\"10.16965/ijims.2021.114\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: The global pandemic Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS, CoV-2) is highly contagious and has driven many hospitals including Hospital Sungai Buloh (HSB) in Malaysia to become a designated hospital exclusively for COVID-19 patients only. These patients may develop complications requiring surgical consultation and intervention which have led to concerns regarding delay in the surgical management of these patients. Currently, there is a paucity of published data worldwide with regards to whether there is a delay in the time taken to perform the intended emergency procedure that has been planned by the attending surgical team. Method: This single-centered, retrospective study aims to investigate whether there is any delay in performing emergency surgical procedures during the COVID-19 pandemic in HSB from 1/3/2020 to 30/3/2021. All the cases were categorized based on recommended priority into acute emergency, emergency, and urgent. Results: There were a total of 105 patients; 5(4.8%) acute emergency cases, 22(21.0%) emergency cases, and 78 (74% cases) required an urgent intervention of which the majority had an endoscopic procedure performed i.e., 85.9% (67 cases) compared to surgery, 14.1% (11 cases). Patients in the emergency procedure category took the longest time to intervene whereby the median time taken was 548 minutes. 50% of patients in this category were delayed. Patients in the acute emergency category had delays seen in all 5 patients, with a median of 239 minutes. On the other hand, patients in the urgent category had only 10.3% of the patients who were delayed. Conclusion: From the total of 105 patients requiring emergency surgical intervention over 12 months period during the COVID-19 pandemic, the delay was seen in 24 patients (23% of cases). Multiple factors contributing to the delay have been postulated, pertaining to the implementation of the new Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) in managing COVID-19 patients in general, which needs to be verified with further study and addressed accordingly. KEYWORDS: Corona Virus Disease 2019, COVID-19 Pandemic, Emergency surgical intervention, Managing COVID-19 patients.\",\"PeriodicalId\":105328,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Integrative Medical Sciences\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Integrative Medical Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.16965/ijims.2021.114\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Integrative Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.16965/ijims.2021.114","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2 (SARS, CoV-2)引起的全球大流行2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)具有高度传染性,导致包括马来西亚双盖Buloh医院(HSB)在内的许多医院成为COVID-19患者的专属指定医院。这些患者可能会出现并发症,需要手术咨询和干预,这导致了对这些患者手术治疗延迟的担忧。目前,在世界范围内,关于执行主治外科团队计划的预定紧急手术所需的时间是否存在延迟的公开数据不足。方法:本单中心回顾性研究旨在调查2020年3月1日至2021年3月30日HSB地区COVID-19大流行期间急诊外科手术是否有延误。所有病例根据推荐的优先级分为急症、急诊和急症。结果:共105例患者;5例(4.8%)急性紧急病例,22例(21.0%)紧急病例,78例(74%)需要紧急干预,其中大多数进行了内窥镜手术,即85.9%(67例)与手术相比,14.1%(11例)。急诊类别的患者干预时间最长,中位时间为548分钟。这类患者中有50%被延迟。5例急性急诊患者均出现延迟,中位数为239分钟。另一方面,紧急类别的患者仅占延迟患者的10.3%。结论:在COVID-19大流行期间的12个月内,总共有105例患者需要紧急手术干预,其中24例患者(占病例的23%)出现延误。据推测,造成延误的原因有多种,这与新标准操作程序(SOP)在新冠肺炎患者管理中的实施有关,需要进一步研究验证并采取相应措施。关键词:2019冠状病毒病,COVID-19大流行,急诊手术干预,COVID-19患者管理
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Is There a Delay in Emergency Surgical Procedures in a Designated COVID-19 Hospital? -The Hospital Sungai Buloh (Malaysia) Experience
Introduction: The global pandemic Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS, CoV-2) is highly contagious and has driven many hospitals including Hospital Sungai Buloh (HSB) in Malaysia to become a designated hospital exclusively for COVID-19 patients only. These patients may develop complications requiring surgical consultation and intervention which have led to concerns regarding delay in the surgical management of these patients. Currently, there is a paucity of published data worldwide with regards to whether there is a delay in the time taken to perform the intended emergency procedure that has been planned by the attending surgical team. Method: This single-centered, retrospective study aims to investigate whether there is any delay in performing emergency surgical procedures during the COVID-19 pandemic in HSB from 1/3/2020 to 30/3/2021. All the cases were categorized based on recommended priority into acute emergency, emergency, and urgent. Results: There were a total of 105 patients; 5(4.8%) acute emergency cases, 22(21.0%) emergency cases, and 78 (74% cases) required an urgent intervention of which the majority had an endoscopic procedure performed i.e., 85.9% (67 cases) compared to surgery, 14.1% (11 cases). Patients in the emergency procedure category took the longest time to intervene whereby the median time taken was 548 minutes. 50% of patients in this category were delayed. Patients in the acute emergency category had delays seen in all 5 patients, with a median of 239 minutes. On the other hand, patients in the urgent category had only 10.3% of the patients who were delayed. Conclusion: From the total of 105 patients requiring emergency surgical intervention over 12 months period during the COVID-19 pandemic, the delay was seen in 24 patients (23% of cases). Multiple factors contributing to the delay have been postulated, pertaining to the implementation of the new Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) in managing COVID-19 patients in general, which needs to be verified with further study and addressed accordingly. KEYWORDS: Corona Virus Disease 2019, COVID-19 Pandemic, Emergency surgical intervention, Managing COVID-19 patients.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信