将模糊逻辑和形式论证相结合进行法律解释

Proceedings of the 16th edition of the International Conference on Articial Intelligence and Law Pub Date : 2017-06-12 DOI:10.1145/3086512.3086532

C. Pereira, A. Tettamanzi, B. Liao, Alessandra Malerba, A. Rotolo, Leendert van der Torre

{"title":"将模糊逻辑和形式论证相结合进行法律解释","authors":"C. Pereira, A. Tettamanzi, B. Liao, Alessandra Malerba, A. Rotolo, Leendert van der Torre","doi":"10.1145/3086512.3086532","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The interpretation of a norm is often uncertain and conflicting. In this paper we propose a model for arguing about legal interpretation, which considers the problems of vagueness. After motivating our adoption of graded categories as a tool to tackle the problem of open texture in legal interpretation, we introduce a model based on fuzzy logic and argumentation. Then, we conduct a case study by using an example from medically assisted reproduction.","PeriodicalId":425187,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 16th edition of the International Conference on Articial Intelligence and Law","volume":"531 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Combining fuzzy logic and formal argumentation for legal interpretation\",\"authors\":\"C. Pereira, A. Tettamanzi, B. Liao, Alessandra Malerba, A. Rotolo, Leendert van der Torre\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3086512.3086532\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The interpretation of a norm is often uncertain and conflicting. In this paper we propose a model for arguing about legal interpretation, which considers the problems of vagueness. After motivating our adoption of graded categories as a tool to tackle the problem of open texture in legal interpretation, we introduce a model based on fuzzy logic and argumentation. Then, we conduct a case study by using an example from medically assisted reproduction.\",\"PeriodicalId\":425187,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 16th edition of the International Conference on Articial Intelligence and Law\",\"volume\":\"531 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-06-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 16th edition of the International Conference on Articial Intelligence and Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3086512.3086532\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 16th edition of the International Conference on Articial Intelligence and Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3086512.3086532","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 8

摘要

对规范的解释往往是不确定的和相互矛盾的。本文提出了一个考虑法律解释模糊性问题的法律解释争论模型。在提出采用分级分类作为解决法律解释中开放性问题的工具后，我们引入了一个基于模糊逻辑和论证的模型。然后，我们通过使用医学辅助生殖的例子进行案例研究。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Combining fuzzy logic and formal argumentation for legal interpretation

The interpretation of a norm is often uncertain and conflicting. In this paper we propose a model for arguing about legal interpretation, which considers the problems of vagueness. After motivating our adoption of graded categories as a tool to tackle the problem of open texture in legal interpretation, we introduce a model based on fuzzy logic and argumentation. Then, we conduct a case study by using an example from medically assisted reproduction.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Proceedings of the 16th edition of the International Conference on Articial Intelligence and Law

自引率

0.00%

发文量