{"title":"对外宣传对格鲁吉亚政治的影响","authors":"M. Urushadze","doi":"10.33674/220194","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"From 2016, the powerful and permanent ideological impact of the Russian\nmessages on the global community is perceived as one of the most important\nchallenges for the western civilization at the beginning of the 21st century. It\nis without a doubt that the challenge is more acute for the so-called “young\ndemocracies”. Georgia is considered to be one of such states. Thus, we have\ndecided to use Georgia as the example to discuss the general essence\nof propaganda, the mechanisms of its use, the level of resistance by the local\nsocieties towards it and the influence that this phenomenon can have on a\nsmall country. There is no doubt that the success of the propagandist attacks\non the sovereignty of a state directly depends on the level of trust of the wide\nlayers of the society towards the governmental structures of the target state.\nThe higher the level of mistrust, the more successful is the propagandist\ncampaign conducted against a state, and vice versa: the higher the level of\nadequacy between the government and society, stronger the society is in\nwithstanding the propagandist attacks. In case of Georgia, the ideological\nframe of the Georgian society is saturated by the mix of the right-conservative\nideas with the left-socialist directions, where all the narratives of outside\npolitical actors definitely find their support. Based on this, we can suppose\nthat their rhetoric places the society at the risk of negative radicalization","PeriodicalId":256788,"journal":{"name":"Ante Portas - Studia nad bezpieczeństwem","volume":"149 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Projecting the Foreign propaganda on the Georgian Politics\",\"authors\":\"M. Urushadze\",\"doi\":\"10.33674/220194\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"From 2016, the powerful and permanent ideological impact of the Russian\\nmessages on the global community is perceived as one of the most important\\nchallenges for the western civilization at the beginning of the 21st century. It\\nis without a doubt that the challenge is more acute for the so-called “young\\ndemocracies”. Georgia is considered to be one of such states. Thus, we have\\ndecided to use Georgia as the example to discuss the general essence\\nof propaganda, the mechanisms of its use, the level of resistance by the local\\nsocieties towards it and the influence that this phenomenon can have on a\\nsmall country. There is no doubt that the success of the propagandist attacks\\non the sovereignty of a state directly depends on the level of trust of the wide\\nlayers of the society towards the governmental structures of the target state.\\nThe higher the level of mistrust, the more successful is the propagandist\\ncampaign conducted against a state, and vice versa: the higher the level of\\nadequacy between the government and society, stronger the society is in\\nwithstanding the propagandist attacks. In case of Georgia, the ideological\\nframe of the Georgian society is saturated by the mix of the right-conservative\\nideas with the left-socialist directions, where all the narratives of outside\\npolitical actors definitely find their support. Based on this, we can suppose\\nthat their rhetoric places the society at the risk of negative radicalization\",\"PeriodicalId\":256788,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ante Portas - Studia nad bezpieczeństwem\",\"volume\":\"149 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ante Portas - Studia nad bezpieczeństwem\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33674/220194\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ante Portas - Studia nad bezpieczeństwem","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33674/220194","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Projecting the Foreign propaganda on the Georgian Politics
From 2016, the powerful and permanent ideological impact of the Russian
messages on the global community is perceived as one of the most important
challenges for the western civilization at the beginning of the 21st century. It
is without a doubt that the challenge is more acute for the so-called “young
democracies”. Georgia is considered to be one of such states. Thus, we have
decided to use Georgia as the example to discuss the general essence
of propaganda, the mechanisms of its use, the level of resistance by the local
societies towards it and the influence that this phenomenon can have on a
small country. There is no doubt that the success of the propagandist attacks
on the sovereignty of a state directly depends on the level of trust of the wide
layers of the society towards the governmental structures of the target state.
The higher the level of mistrust, the more successful is the propagandist
campaign conducted against a state, and vice versa: the higher the level of
adequacy between the government and society, stronger the society is in
withstanding the propagandist attacks. In case of Georgia, the ideological
frame of the Georgian society is saturated by the mix of the right-conservative
ideas with the left-socialist directions, where all the narratives of outside
political actors definitely find their support. Based on this, we can suppose
that their rhetoric places the society at the risk of negative radicalization