{"title":"《磨漆工:思想视界上的拉尔夫·沃尔多·爱默生和卡尔·马克思","authors":"Benjamin Pickford, Dominic Jaeckle","doi":"10.1353/cap.2023.a899270","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This article undertakes a radical rereading of capitalist ideas in the work of Ralph Waldo Emerson (1803–1882). In both popular and academic appraisals, Emerson is an exponent of mainstream American values, moral and economic. We challenge such appraisals through a novel analysis of Emerson's brief contact with the work of Karl Marx and proceed to illustrate the subtlety of Emerson's engagement with the structure of capitalist labor. Using explanatory metaphors based on painterly labor, Emerson demonstrates how labor structures that are assumed to be products of capitalism were also discernable in cultural settings in the mid-nineteenth century, and that neglected lines of affinity exist between cultural and capitalist production. The result is a speculative new purview for the analysis of the social forms of the capitalist era, which indicates the shortcomings of what Michel Foucault termed a Marxian \"horizon of thought\" that governs the critical outlook of the humanities.","PeriodicalId":243846,"journal":{"name":"Capitalism: A Journal of History and Economics","volume":"69 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Paintgrinder: Ralph Waldo Emerson and Karl Marx on a Horizon of Thought\",\"authors\":\"Benjamin Pickford, Dominic Jaeckle\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/cap.2023.a899270\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:This article undertakes a radical rereading of capitalist ideas in the work of Ralph Waldo Emerson (1803–1882). In both popular and academic appraisals, Emerson is an exponent of mainstream American values, moral and economic. We challenge such appraisals through a novel analysis of Emerson's brief contact with the work of Karl Marx and proceed to illustrate the subtlety of Emerson's engagement with the structure of capitalist labor. Using explanatory metaphors based on painterly labor, Emerson demonstrates how labor structures that are assumed to be products of capitalism were also discernable in cultural settings in the mid-nineteenth century, and that neglected lines of affinity exist between cultural and capitalist production. The result is a speculative new purview for the analysis of the social forms of the capitalist era, which indicates the shortcomings of what Michel Foucault termed a Marxian \\\"horizon of thought\\\" that governs the critical outlook of the humanities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":243846,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Capitalism: A Journal of History and Economics\",\"volume\":\"69 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Capitalism: A Journal of History and Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/cap.2023.a899270\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Capitalism: A Journal of History and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/cap.2023.a899270","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
摘要:本文对拉尔夫·沃尔多·爱默生(1803-1882)作品中的资本主义思想进行了彻底的重新解读。在大众和学术评价中,爱默生都是美国主流价值观的代表,包括道德价值观和经济价值观。我们通过对爱默生与卡尔·马克思的作品的短暂接触的新颖分析来挑战这些评价,并进一步说明爱默生与资本主义劳动结构的微妙接触。爱默生以绘画劳动为基础,运用解释性的隐喻,论证了被认为是资本主义产物的劳动结构在19世纪中期的文化背景中是如何清晰可辨的,以及文化生产和资本主义生产之间存在被忽视的亲缘关系。其结果是为分析资本主义时代的社会形式提供了一种思辨的新视角,这表明了米歇尔·福柯(Michel Foucault)所称的马克思主义“思想视界”(horizon of thought)的缺陷。
The Paintgrinder: Ralph Waldo Emerson and Karl Marx on a Horizon of Thought
Abstract:This article undertakes a radical rereading of capitalist ideas in the work of Ralph Waldo Emerson (1803–1882). In both popular and academic appraisals, Emerson is an exponent of mainstream American values, moral and economic. We challenge such appraisals through a novel analysis of Emerson's brief contact with the work of Karl Marx and proceed to illustrate the subtlety of Emerson's engagement with the structure of capitalist labor. Using explanatory metaphors based on painterly labor, Emerson demonstrates how labor structures that are assumed to be products of capitalism were also discernable in cultural settings in the mid-nineteenth century, and that neglected lines of affinity exist between cultural and capitalist production. The result is a speculative new purview for the analysis of the social forms of the capitalist era, which indicates the shortcomings of what Michel Foucault termed a Marxian "horizon of thought" that governs the critical outlook of the humanities.