这到底是谁的数据?欧盟关于公民在数字政府中当前和未来角色的政策分歧

H. Graux
{"title":"这到底是谁的数据?欧盟关于公民在数字政府中当前和未来角色的政策分歧","authors":"H. Graux","doi":"10.1145/3598469.3598526","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In European eGovernment and data policies, there is presently a strong focus on an active controlling role for the citizen. A modern citizen should be empowered to take charge of their data, both towards public administrations, and in the digital society in general. However, this creates certain tensions between the right to control one's own data, and the right to be protected against abuses. A citizen who is entirely free to make choices, may need to face unpleasant consequences when those choices prove harmful to their interests. Moreover, allowing the citizen to control their data can impede exchanges that are in the public interest – but which are not necessarily desired by the citizens themselves. European policies and European legislation in relation to digital data, including with respect to eGovernment, try to strike a careful balance between individual control and universal protection. It remains challenging none the less to find and implement suitable and consistent answers. This paper examines some of the principal choices that have been made in the past few years in the EU, how these choices are currently evolving, and what needs to be done to avoid or at least mitigate future difficulties.","PeriodicalId":401026,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 24th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research","volume":"68 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Whose data is it anyway? Diverging perspectives in EU policy on the current and future role of the citizen in digital government\",\"authors\":\"H. Graux\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3598469.3598526\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In European eGovernment and data policies, there is presently a strong focus on an active controlling role for the citizen. A modern citizen should be empowered to take charge of their data, both towards public administrations, and in the digital society in general. However, this creates certain tensions between the right to control one's own data, and the right to be protected against abuses. A citizen who is entirely free to make choices, may need to face unpleasant consequences when those choices prove harmful to their interests. Moreover, allowing the citizen to control their data can impede exchanges that are in the public interest – but which are not necessarily desired by the citizens themselves. European policies and European legislation in relation to digital data, including with respect to eGovernment, try to strike a careful balance between individual control and universal protection. It remains challenging none the less to find and implement suitable and consistent answers. This paper examines some of the principal choices that have been made in the past few years in the EU, how these choices are currently evolving, and what needs to be done to avoid or at least mitigate future difficulties.\",\"PeriodicalId\":401026,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 24th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research\",\"volume\":\"68 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 24th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3598469.3598526\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 24th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3598469.3598526","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在欧洲的电子政务和数据政策中,目前强烈关注公民的积极控制作用。现代公民应该被授权管理他们的数据,无论是对公共行政部门,还是在整个数字社会。然而,这在控制个人数据的权利和免受滥用的权利之间造成了一定的紧张关系。一个公民完全可以自由地做出选择,当这些选择被证明对他们的利益有害时,可能需要面对令人不快的后果。此外,允许公民控制他们的数据可能会阻碍符合公共利益的交流——但这并不一定是公民自己想要的。欧洲有关数字数据的政策和立法,包括电子政务,试图在个人控制和普遍保护之间取得谨慎的平衡。然而,寻找和实施合适和一致的答案仍然是一项挑战。本文考察了欧盟在过去几年中做出的一些主要选择,这些选择目前是如何演变的,以及需要做些什么来避免或至少减轻未来的困难。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Whose data is it anyway? Diverging perspectives in EU policy on the current and future role of the citizen in digital government
In European eGovernment and data policies, there is presently a strong focus on an active controlling role for the citizen. A modern citizen should be empowered to take charge of their data, both towards public administrations, and in the digital society in general. However, this creates certain tensions between the right to control one's own data, and the right to be protected against abuses. A citizen who is entirely free to make choices, may need to face unpleasant consequences when those choices prove harmful to their interests. Moreover, allowing the citizen to control their data can impede exchanges that are in the public interest – but which are not necessarily desired by the citizens themselves. European policies and European legislation in relation to digital data, including with respect to eGovernment, try to strike a careful balance between individual control and universal protection. It remains challenging none the less to find and implement suitable and consistent answers. This paper examines some of the principal choices that have been made in the past few years in the EU, how these choices are currently evolving, and what needs to be done to avoid or at least mitigate future difficulties.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信