沙特阿拉伯物理治疗师对直接接触和执业范围的态度和信念

Safwan Alosaimi, R. Alamri, Maher Alghamdi
{"title":"沙特阿拉伯物理治疗师对直接接触和执业范围的态度和信念","authors":"Safwan Alosaimi, R. Alamri, Maher Alghamdi","doi":"10.15342/ijms.2022.662","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose. This study aimed to better understand what practicing physical therapists know and believe about direct access (DA) and scope of practice (SOP) for physical therapy in Saudi Arabia (SA). Methods. A pilot study was first performed to ensure the clarity of the questions. Then, a cross-sectional survey was sent through emails and social media platforms including three main sections: demographics, opinions, and beliefs questions. Results. A total of 150 respondents met the inclusion criteria. About 55.3% of the participants reported never or rarely using an SOP document as a reference for knowing their practice. Moreover, nearly 48% learned about the SOP through an informal discussion. Only 24.7% of the participants correctly identified which practice setting DA is permitted. Most of the participants felt confident or strongly confident of their abilities to assess (67.3%) and treat (72%) patients without physicians’ referral. Around 84% of the participants agreed or strongly agreed that DA should be expanded to include all healthcare settings. Conclusion. We found that physical therapists are confident about their ability to treat and assess patients without physicians’ referrals. There is uncertainty about where DA is permitted in SA.","PeriodicalId":143308,"journal":{"name":"Integrative Journal of Medical Sciences","volume":"85 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Attitudes and Beliefs of Physical Therapists in Saudi Arabia Regarding Direct Access and Scope of Practice\",\"authors\":\"Safwan Alosaimi, R. Alamri, Maher Alghamdi\",\"doi\":\"10.15342/ijms.2022.662\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose. This study aimed to better understand what practicing physical therapists know and believe about direct access (DA) and scope of practice (SOP) for physical therapy in Saudi Arabia (SA). Methods. A pilot study was first performed to ensure the clarity of the questions. Then, a cross-sectional survey was sent through emails and social media platforms including three main sections: demographics, opinions, and beliefs questions. Results. A total of 150 respondents met the inclusion criteria. About 55.3% of the participants reported never or rarely using an SOP document as a reference for knowing their practice. Moreover, nearly 48% learned about the SOP through an informal discussion. Only 24.7% of the participants correctly identified which practice setting DA is permitted. Most of the participants felt confident or strongly confident of their abilities to assess (67.3%) and treat (72%) patients without physicians’ referral. Around 84% of the participants agreed or strongly agreed that DA should be expanded to include all healthcare settings. Conclusion. We found that physical therapists are confident about their ability to treat and assess patients without physicians’ referrals. There is uncertainty about where DA is permitted in SA.\",\"PeriodicalId\":143308,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Integrative Journal of Medical Sciences\",\"volume\":\"85 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Integrative Journal of Medical Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15342/ijms.2022.662\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Integrative Journal of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15342/ijms.2022.662","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的。本研究旨在更好地了解沙特阿拉伯(SA)的物理治疗师对物理治疗的直接准入(DA)和实践范围(SOP)的认识和看法。方法。首先进行了一项试点研究,以确保问题的清晰度。然后,通过电子邮件和社交媒体平台发送横断面调查,包括三个主要部分:人口统计、观点和信仰问题。结果。共有150名受访者符合入选标准。约55.3%的参与者报告从未或很少使用SOP文件作为了解其实践的参考。此外,近48%的人通过非正式讨论了解了SOP。只有24.7%的参与者正确识别了允许的练习设置DA。大多数参与者对自己评估(67.3%)和治疗(72%)没有医生转诊的病人的能力有信心或强烈的信心。大约84%的参与者同意或强烈同意应扩大DA以包括所有医疗保健环境。结论。我们发现,物理治疗师对自己治疗和评估病人的能力很有信心,没有医生的推荐。在SA的哪些地方允许DA存在不确定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Attitudes and Beliefs of Physical Therapists in Saudi Arabia Regarding Direct Access and Scope of Practice
Purpose. This study aimed to better understand what practicing physical therapists know and believe about direct access (DA) and scope of practice (SOP) for physical therapy in Saudi Arabia (SA). Methods. A pilot study was first performed to ensure the clarity of the questions. Then, a cross-sectional survey was sent through emails and social media platforms including three main sections: demographics, opinions, and beliefs questions. Results. A total of 150 respondents met the inclusion criteria. About 55.3% of the participants reported never or rarely using an SOP document as a reference for knowing their practice. Moreover, nearly 48% learned about the SOP through an informal discussion. Only 24.7% of the participants correctly identified which practice setting DA is permitted. Most of the participants felt confident or strongly confident of their abilities to assess (67.3%) and treat (72%) patients without physicians’ referral. Around 84% of the participants agreed or strongly agreed that DA should be expanded to include all healthcare settings. Conclusion. We found that physical therapists are confident about their ability to treat and assess patients without physicians’ referrals. There is uncertainty about where DA is permitted in SA.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信