结论

Jasmine Hunter Evans
{"title":"结论","authors":"Jasmine Hunter Evans","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198868194.003.0014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Conclusion reflects upon the paradoxical nature of Jones’s intricate and multifaceted reimagining of Rome. In his works, Rome is at once the ultimate symbol of destructive imperialism and decline and the rejuvenating cultural force which preserves the classical and Christian heritage so as to bequeath this to the West and, in particular, to Wales. The conclusion draws these ideas together though the analysis of two paintings—The Mother of the West (1942) and Y Cyfarchiad i Fair (1963)—and lays out the implications of this complex approach to the Roman past for our understanding of Jones’s work and thought. It makes the case for recognising Jones’s reception of Rome as the fascinating response of a creatively diverse and politically engaged artist to his own complicated sense of crisis in twentieth-century modernity.","PeriodicalId":201769,"journal":{"name":"David Jones and Rome","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Conclusion\",\"authors\":\"Jasmine Hunter Evans\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/oso/9780198868194.003.0014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Conclusion reflects upon the paradoxical nature of Jones’s intricate and multifaceted reimagining of Rome. In his works, Rome is at once the ultimate symbol of destructive imperialism and decline and the rejuvenating cultural force which preserves the classical and Christian heritage so as to bequeath this to the West and, in particular, to Wales. The conclusion draws these ideas together though the analysis of two paintings—The Mother of the West (1942) and Y Cyfarchiad i Fair (1963)—and lays out the implications of this complex approach to the Roman past for our understanding of Jones’s work and thought. It makes the case for recognising Jones’s reception of Rome as the fascinating response of a creatively diverse and politically engaged artist to his own complicated sense of crisis in twentieth-century modernity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":201769,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"David Jones and Rome\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"David Jones and Rome\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198868194.003.0014\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"David Jones and Rome","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198868194.003.0014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

结语部分反映了琼斯对罗马的复杂和多方面的重新想象的矛盾本质。在他的作品中,罗马既是破坏性帝国主义和衰落的终极象征,又是复兴文化力量的象征,这种文化力量保留了古典和基督教遗产,以便将其遗赠给西方,特别是威尔士。结论部分通过对两幅画——《西方之母》(1942)和《西法奇亚在集市上》(1963)——的分析,将这些观点结合在一起,并为我们理解琼斯的作品和思想,阐述了这种对罗马过去的复杂研究方法的含义。这本书让我们认识到,琼斯对《罗马》的接纳,是一位富有创造力、参与政治的艺术家对自己在20世纪现代性中复杂的危机感的迷人回应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Conclusion
The Conclusion reflects upon the paradoxical nature of Jones’s intricate and multifaceted reimagining of Rome. In his works, Rome is at once the ultimate symbol of destructive imperialism and decline and the rejuvenating cultural force which preserves the classical and Christian heritage so as to bequeath this to the West and, in particular, to Wales. The conclusion draws these ideas together though the analysis of two paintings—The Mother of the West (1942) and Y Cyfarchiad i Fair (1963)—and lays out the implications of this complex approach to the Roman past for our understanding of Jones’s work and thought. It makes the case for recognising Jones’s reception of Rome as the fascinating response of a creatively diverse and politically engaged artist to his own complicated sense of crisis in twentieth-century modernity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信