科学分析分析了一些关于如何解释QS的观点。雅辛关于燃料的80节

Saepulloh Saepulloh
{"title":"科学分析分析了一些关于如何解释QS的观点。雅辛关于燃料的80节","authors":"Saepulloh Saepulloh","doi":"10.47971/tjpi.v1i1.94","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThe diversity of thought patterns among the interpreter of HolyQur'an in interpreting verses, especially with regard to the scientificmiracles of the Qur'an is something interesting to study. The Qur'anwas revealed not to explain science, but as a guide for those who arepious. However, many of the verses of the Qur'an are calling forthinking, so it is inevitable that the motivation of the exegete to studyverse by verse will continue to develop in harmony with scientificdisciplines, trends, and the development of science and technology intheir lifetime.The problem in this research is the differences of opinion someinterpreters of Holy Qur'an are quite significant in interpreting QS.Yaasiin verse 80, by raising six opinions of the interpreter of HolyQur'an representing classical and contemporary of interpreters of HolyQur'an.The purpose of this study is to uncover the background of theHoly Quran's interpreters dissent, looking for points of similaritythrough scientific analysis. Thus, this research includes qualitativeresearch with a literature study approach. The primary data sourcesare obtained from the Qur'an commentaries, science books and othersources.The research step starts from the presentation of data fromseveral Holy Quran's interpreters in the study of the verse under studyalong with the bibliography to determine the development of science in  \n Thoriqotuna | Jurnal Pendidikan Islamits time. Then these opinions are clarified to find out the differencesand similarities, then reviewed through a scientific analysis approach.From the results of the study, identified three main opinions ofHoly Qur'an's interpreters in interpreting the QS. Yaasiin paragraph80, namely; First, opinions about the fuel of al-‘afar and al-marh (atype of green plants in the country of Hijaz). Second, the opinion thatstates fuel in the process of photosynthesis, and the third opinion aboutfuel in the form of coal.The results of the study showed a relationship (equation)between these commentaries in terms of the energy products producedand their utilization. Different in terms of the shape of the fuel, but themolecular structure (atom C), the combustion process (O2 as anoxidizer) and the product of combustion (CO2 + H2O + E) are thesame. Thus, scientific analysis makes the same concept from theopinions of several different interpreters of Holy qur'an. \n","PeriodicalId":208742,"journal":{"name":"THORIQOTUNA: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ANALISIS SAINS TERHADAP PENDAPAT BEBERAPA MUFASIR DALAM MENJELASKAN QS. YAASIIN AYAT 80 TENTANG BAHAN BAKAR\",\"authors\":\"Saepulloh Saepulloh\",\"doi\":\"10.47971/tjpi.v1i1.94\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nThe diversity of thought patterns among the interpreter of HolyQur'an in interpreting verses, especially with regard to the scientificmiracles of the Qur'an is something interesting to study. The Qur'anwas revealed not to explain science, but as a guide for those who arepious. However, many of the verses of the Qur'an are calling forthinking, so it is inevitable that the motivation of the exegete to studyverse by verse will continue to develop in harmony with scientificdisciplines, trends, and the development of science and technology intheir lifetime.The problem in this research is the differences of opinion someinterpreters of Holy Qur'an are quite significant in interpreting QS.Yaasiin verse 80, by raising six opinions of the interpreter of HolyQur'an representing classical and contemporary of interpreters of HolyQur'an.The purpose of this study is to uncover the background of theHoly Quran's interpreters dissent, looking for points of similaritythrough scientific analysis. Thus, this research includes qualitativeresearch with a literature study approach. The primary data sourcesare obtained from the Qur'an commentaries, science books and othersources.The research step starts from the presentation of data fromseveral Holy Quran's interpreters in the study of the verse under studyalong with the bibliography to determine the development of science in  \\n Thoriqotuna | Jurnal Pendidikan Islamits time. Then these opinions are clarified to find out the differencesand similarities, then reviewed through a scientific analysis approach.From the results of the study, identified three main opinions ofHoly Qur'an's interpreters in interpreting the QS. Yaasiin paragraph80, namely; First, opinions about the fuel of al-‘afar and al-marh (atype of green plants in the country of Hijaz). Second, the opinion thatstates fuel in the process of photosynthesis, and the third opinion aboutfuel in the form of coal.The results of the study showed a relationship (equation)between these commentaries in terms of the energy products producedand their utilization. Different in terms of the shape of the fuel, but themolecular structure (atom C), the combustion process (O2 as anoxidizer) and the product of combustion (CO2 + H2O + E) are thesame. Thus, scientific analysis makes the same concept from theopinions of several different interpreters of Holy qur'an. \\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":208742,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"THORIQOTUNA: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"THORIQOTUNA: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47971/tjpi.v1i1.94\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"THORIQOTUNA: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47971/tjpi.v1i1.94","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

《古兰经》的诠释者在解读经文时思维模式的多样性,尤其是在解读《古兰经》的科学奇迹时,这是一个值得研究的有趣问题。《古兰经》的降示不是为了解释科学,而是为那些虔诚的人提供指引。然而,《古兰经》的许多经文都是发人深思的,因此,在他们的一生中,逐节研究的动机将不可避免地与科学学科、趋势和科学技术的发展相协调地继续发展。本研究中存在的问题是,一些《古兰经》诠释者在解读《QS》时意见分歧很大。Yaasiin第80节,通过提出神圣古兰经诠释者的六种观点,代表经典和当代的神圣古兰经诠释者。本研究的目的是揭示《古兰经》释经者不同意见的背景,通过科学的分析寻找相似之处。因此,本研究采用文献研究法进行定性研究。主要的数据来源是从《古兰经》注释、科学书籍和其他来源获得的。研究步骤从几位《古兰经》诠释者在研究所研究的经文时所提供的资料以及参考书目开始,以确定《索里奎图纳》(《Pendidikan期刊》)伊斯兰时代的科学发展。然后对这些观点进行梳理,找出其异同点,并用科学的分析方法对其进行梳理。根据研究结果,确定了《古兰经》诠释者在解读《QS》时的三种主要观点。第80段,即;首先,关于al- afar和al-marh (Hijaz国家的一种绿色植物)燃料的意见。第二种观点认为光合作用过程中存在燃料,第三种观点认为燃料以煤的形式存在。研究结果表明,这些评论在能源产品的生产和它们的利用之间存在关系(方程)。燃料的形状不同,但分子结构(原子C)、燃烧过程(O2作为氧化剂)和燃烧产物(CO2 + H2O + E)是相同的。因此,科学分析从几个不同的古兰经诠释者的观点中得出相同的概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
ANALISIS SAINS TERHADAP PENDAPAT BEBERAPA MUFASIR DALAM MENJELASKAN QS. YAASIIN AYAT 80 TENTANG BAHAN BAKAR
The diversity of thought patterns among the interpreter of HolyQur'an in interpreting verses, especially with regard to the scientificmiracles of the Qur'an is something interesting to study. The Qur'anwas revealed not to explain science, but as a guide for those who arepious. However, many of the verses of the Qur'an are calling forthinking, so it is inevitable that the motivation of the exegete to studyverse by verse will continue to develop in harmony with scientificdisciplines, trends, and the development of science and technology intheir lifetime.The problem in this research is the differences of opinion someinterpreters of Holy Qur'an are quite significant in interpreting QS.Yaasiin verse 80, by raising six opinions of the interpreter of HolyQur'an representing classical and contemporary of interpreters of HolyQur'an.The purpose of this study is to uncover the background of theHoly Quran's interpreters dissent, looking for points of similaritythrough scientific analysis. Thus, this research includes qualitativeresearch with a literature study approach. The primary data sourcesare obtained from the Qur'an commentaries, science books and othersources.The research step starts from the presentation of data fromseveral Holy Quran's interpreters in the study of the verse under studyalong with the bibliography to determine the development of science in   Thoriqotuna | Jurnal Pendidikan Islamits time. Then these opinions are clarified to find out the differencesand similarities, then reviewed through a scientific analysis approach.From the results of the study, identified three main opinions ofHoly Qur'an's interpreters in interpreting the QS. Yaasiin paragraph80, namely; First, opinions about the fuel of al-‘afar and al-marh (atype of green plants in the country of Hijaz). Second, the opinion thatstates fuel in the process of photosynthesis, and the third opinion aboutfuel in the form of coal.The results of the study showed a relationship (equation)between these commentaries in terms of the energy products producedand their utilization. Different in terms of the shape of the fuel, but themolecular structure (atom C), the combustion process (O2 as anoxidizer) and the product of combustion (CO2 + H2O + E) are thesame. Thus, scientific analysis makes the same concept from theopinions of several different interpreters of Holy qur'an.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信