一个基于sat的混合决策过程,用于分离逻辑和未解释的函数

S. Seshia, Shuvendu K. Lahiri, R. Bryant
{"title":"一个基于sat的混合决策过程,用于分离逻辑和未解释的函数","authors":"S. Seshia, Shuvendu K. Lahiri, R. Bryant","doi":"10.1145/775832.775945","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"SAT-based decision procedures for quantifier-free fragments of first-order logic have proved to be useful in formal verification. These decisions procedures are either based on encoding atomic subformulas with Boolean variables, or by encoding integer variables as bit-vectors. Based on evaluating these two encoding methods on a diverse set of hardware and software benchmarks, we conclude that neither method is robust to variations in formula characteristics. We therefore propose a new hybrid technique that combines the two methods. We give experimental results showing that the hybrid method can significantly outperform either approach as well as other decision procedures.","PeriodicalId":167477,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings 2003. Design Automation Conference (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37451)","volume":"44 3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"91","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A hybrid SAT-based decision procedure for separation logic with uninterpreted functions\",\"authors\":\"S. Seshia, Shuvendu K. Lahiri, R. Bryant\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/775832.775945\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"SAT-based decision procedures for quantifier-free fragments of first-order logic have proved to be useful in formal verification. These decisions procedures are either based on encoding atomic subformulas with Boolean variables, or by encoding integer variables as bit-vectors. Based on evaluating these two encoding methods on a diverse set of hardware and software benchmarks, we conclude that neither method is robust to variations in formula characteristics. We therefore propose a new hybrid technique that combines the two methods. We give experimental results showing that the hybrid method can significantly outperform either approach as well as other decision procedures.\",\"PeriodicalId\":167477,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings 2003. Design Automation Conference (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37451)\",\"volume\":\"44 3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-06-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"91\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings 2003. Design Automation Conference (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37451)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/775832.775945\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings 2003. Design Automation Conference (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37451)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/775832.775945","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 91

摘要

基于sat的一阶逻辑无量词片段的决策程序已被证明是形式化验证的有用方法。这些决策过程要么基于用布尔变量编码原子子公式,要么基于将整数变量编码为位向量。基于在不同的硬件和软件基准测试中评估这两种编码方法,我们得出结论,这两种方法对公式特征的变化都没有鲁棒性。因此,我们提出了一种新的混合技术,将这两种方法结合起来。我们给出的实验结果表明,混合方法可以显著优于任何一种方法以及其他决策方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A hybrid SAT-based decision procedure for separation logic with uninterpreted functions
SAT-based decision procedures for quantifier-free fragments of first-order logic have proved to be useful in formal verification. These decisions procedures are either based on encoding atomic subformulas with Boolean variables, or by encoding integer variables as bit-vectors. Based on evaluating these two encoding methods on a diverse set of hardware and software benchmarks, we conclude that neither method is robust to variations in formula characteristics. We therefore propose a new hybrid technique that combines the two methods. We give experimental results showing that the hybrid method can significantly outperform either approach as well as other decision procedures.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信