案例工具:了解不使用的原因

N. L. Chervany, Diane Lending
{"title":"案例工具:了解不使用的原因","authors":"N. L. Chervany, Diane Lending","doi":"10.1145/292349.292353","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Computer-Aided Software Engineering (CASE) technologies are tools that provide automated assistance for software development [3]. The goal of introducing CASE tools is the reduction of the time and cost of software development and the enhancement of the quality of the systems developed [3], [20]. This paper explores the use of CASE tools. We ask several questions. Are CASE tools being used? If yes, what features within the tool are being used? Next, we explore two potential reasons for the expected low use. Do CASE tools change the job of the systems developer in an unattractive way? And are the people who are expected to use CASE tools motivated to use them?233 systems developers were surveyed to answer these questions. We found that CASE tools are being used but not in many companies. Within the companies that have adopted CASE tools, few people are actually using the tools. The systems developers who use CASE tools are using formal methodologies more often than systems developers who do not use CASE tools. Systems developers allocate their time differently depending on whether they are using a CASE tool or not. Those who use the tools are using few of the functions within the tools. Finally we found that people were basically neutral on whether they enjoyed using the tool and whether the tool was useful.","PeriodicalId":426630,"journal":{"name":"ACM Sigcpr Computer Personnel","volume":"55 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"26","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CASE tools: understanding the reasons for non-use\",\"authors\":\"N. L. Chervany, Diane Lending\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/292349.292353\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Computer-Aided Software Engineering (CASE) technologies are tools that provide automated assistance for software development [3]. The goal of introducing CASE tools is the reduction of the time and cost of software development and the enhancement of the quality of the systems developed [3], [20]. This paper explores the use of CASE tools. We ask several questions. Are CASE tools being used? If yes, what features within the tool are being used? Next, we explore two potential reasons for the expected low use. Do CASE tools change the job of the systems developer in an unattractive way? And are the people who are expected to use CASE tools motivated to use them?233 systems developers were surveyed to answer these questions. We found that CASE tools are being used but not in many companies. Within the companies that have adopted CASE tools, few people are actually using the tools. The systems developers who use CASE tools are using formal methodologies more often than systems developers who do not use CASE tools. Systems developers allocate their time differently depending on whether they are using a CASE tool or not. Those who use the tools are using few of the functions within the tools. Finally we found that people were basically neutral on whether they enjoyed using the tool and whether the tool was useful.\",\"PeriodicalId\":426630,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACM Sigcpr Computer Personnel\",\"volume\":\"55 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1998-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"26\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACM Sigcpr Computer Personnel\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/292349.292353\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Sigcpr Computer Personnel","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/292349.292353","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 26

摘要

计算机辅助软件工程(CASE)技术是为软件开发提供自动化辅助的工具[3]。引入CASE工具的目标是减少软件开发的时间和成本,并提高所开发系统的质量[3],[20]。本文探讨了CASE工具的使用。我们问了几个问题。是否使用了CASE工具?如果是,使用的是工具中的哪些特性?接下来,我们将探讨预期低使用率的两个潜在原因。CASE工具是否以一种不吸引人的方式改变了系统开发人员的工作?那些被期望使用CASE工具的人会被激励去使用它们吗?我们调查了233位系统开发人员来回答这些问题。我们发现CASE工具正在被使用,但不是在很多公司中。在采用CASE工具的公司中,很少有人真正使用这些工具。使用CASE工具的系统开发人员比不使用CASE工具的系统开发人员更经常地使用正式的方法。系统开发人员根据他们是否使用CASE工具来分配他们的时间。那些使用工具的人很少使用工具中的功能。最后,我们发现人们在是否喜欢使用这个工具以及这个工具是否有用的问题上基本上是中立的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
CASE tools: understanding the reasons for non-use
Computer-Aided Software Engineering (CASE) technologies are tools that provide automated assistance for software development [3]. The goal of introducing CASE tools is the reduction of the time and cost of software development and the enhancement of the quality of the systems developed [3], [20]. This paper explores the use of CASE tools. We ask several questions. Are CASE tools being used? If yes, what features within the tool are being used? Next, we explore two potential reasons for the expected low use. Do CASE tools change the job of the systems developer in an unattractive way? And are the people who are expected to use CASE tools motivated to use them?233 systems developers were surveyed to answer these questions. We found that CASE tools are being used but not in many companies. Within the companies that have adopted CASE tools, few people are actually using the tools. The systems developers who use CASE tools are using formal methodologies more often than systems developers who do not use CASE tools. Systems developers allocate their time differently depending on whether they are using a CASE tool or not. Those who use the tools are using few of the functions within the tools. Finally we found that people were basically neutral on whether they enjoyed using the tool and whether the tool was useful.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信