德国农业数字技术对社会可持续性的影响——德尔菲研究与实践农民调查的比较

R. Weber, Johannes Munz, Jürgen Braun, M. Frank
{"title":"德国农业数字技术对社会可持续性的影响——德尔菲研究与实践农民调查的比较","authors":"R. Weber, Johannes Munz, Jürgen Braun, M. Frank","doi":"10.51193/ijaer.2023.9210","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Digitization in agriculture will have an impact on all dimensions of sustainability. However, the social dimension of sustainability is often neglected because it is very difficult to quantify and measure using indicators. This paper investigated and elaborated how digitization in agriculture is perceived to affect the social dimension of sustainability. A mixed-method approach was chosen, consisting of a qualitative Delphi study with experts and a quantitative survey with practicing farmers. It was noticeable that for all questions where there are particularly striking deviations, it can be seen that the Delphi experts always achieve a higher mean value than the practicing farmers. Experts see farmers as being more overburdened when it comes to dealing with digital technologies. They also see digitization as an opportunity to create new jobs. Risks are also rated higher by the experts. For example, a higher dependence on manufacturers was indicated, and risks are also rated higher in the case of data misuse. The experts also gave a higher rating to opportunities in the area of cost calculation and in the opening up of new business models. The experts do not see any risk that the profession of farmer will be abolished in the course of digitization and replaced by large corporations. However, the result achieved is considerably higher than that of the practicing farmers. Overall, the results of the mixed-methods approach were found to be similar among experts and practicing farmers for most questions.","PeriodicalId":182275,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Research","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"IMPACT OF DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES IN AGRICULTURE IN GERMANY ON SOCIAL SUSTAINABILITY –COMPARISON OF A DELPHI STUDY WITH A SURVEY OF PRACTICING FARMERS\",\"authors\":\"R. Weber, Johannes Munz, Jürgen Braun, M. Frank\",\"doi\":\"10.51193/ijaer.2023.9210\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Digitization in agriculture will have an impact on all dimensions of sustainability. However, the social dimension of sustainability is often neglected because it is very difficult to quantify and measure using indicators. This paper investigated and elaborated how digitization in agriculture is perceived to affect the social dimension of sustainability. A mixed-method approach was chosen, consisting of a qualitative Delphi study with experts and a quantitative survey with practicing farmers. It was noticeable that for all questions where there are particularly striking deviations, it can be seen that the Delphi experts always achieve a higher mean value than the practicing farmers. Experts see farmers as being more overburdened when it comes to dealing with digital technologies. They also see digitization as an opportunity to create new jobs. Risks are also rated higher by the experts. For example, a higher dependence on manufacturers was indicated, and risks are also rated higher in the case of data misuse. The experts also gave a higher rating to opportunities in the area of cost calculation and in the opening up of new business models. The experts do not see any risk that the profession of farmer will be abolished in the course of digitization and replaced by large corporations. However, the result achieved is considerably higher than that of the practicing farmers. Overall, the results of the mixed-methods approach were found to be similar among experts and practicing farmers for most questions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":182275,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Research\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.51193/ijaer.2023.9210\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51193/ijaer.2023.9210","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

农业数字化将对可持续性的各个方面产生影响。然而,可持续性的社会层面往往被忽视,因为很难用指标来量化和衡量。本文调查并阐述了农业数字化如何影响可持续性的社会维度。选择了混合方法,包括与专家进行定性德尔菲研究和与实践农民进行定量调查。值得注意的是,对于所有存在特别显著偏差的问题,可以看出德尔菲专家总是比实践农民获得更高的平均值。专家认为,在处理数字技术方面,农民负担过重。他们还将数字化视为创造新就业机会的机会。专家对风险的评价也更高。例如,对制造商的依赖程度较高,在数据滥用的情况下,风险也被评为较高。专家们还对成本计算和开辟新商业模式方面的机会给予了更高的评价。专家们认为,在数字化过程中,农民职业不会被废除,并被大企业所取代。但取得的成绩明显高于实践农民。总的来说,在大多数问题上,专家和实践农民发现混合方法的结果是相似的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
IMPACT OF DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES IN AGRICULTURE IN GERMANY ON SOCIAL SUSTAINABILITY –COMPARISON OF A DELPHI STUDY WITH A SURVEY OF PRACTICING FARMERS
Digitization in agriculture will have an impact on all dimensions of sustainability. However, the social dimension of sustainability is often neglected because it is very difficult to quantify and measure using indicators. This paper investigated and elaborated how digitization in agriculture is perceived to affect the social dimension of sustainability. A mixed-method approach was chosen, consisting of a qualitative Delphi study with experts and a quantitative survey with practicing farmers. It was noticeable that for all questions where there are particularly striking deviations, it can be seen that the Delphi experts always achieve a higher mean value than the practicing farmers. Experts see farmers as being more overburdened when it comes to dealing with digital technologies. They also see digitization as an opportunity to create new jobs. Risks are also rated higher by the experts. For example, a higher dependence on manufacturers was indicated, and risks are also rated higher in the case of data misuse. The experts also gave a higher rating to opportunities in the area of cost calculation and in the opening up of new business models. The experts do not see any risk that the profession of farmer will be abolished in the course of digitization and replaced by large corporations. However, the result achieved is considerably higher than that of the practicing farmers. Overall, the results of the mixed-methods approach were found to be similar among experts and practicing farmers for most questions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信