科斯定理

R. Coase, LeRoy Fibre’s
{"title":"科斯定理","authors":"R. Coase, LeRoy Fibre’s","doi":"10.4337/9781788118262.00018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recognizing that safety has costs, Coase and his followers think of an efficient rule as one that minimizes the sum of accident costs and prevention costs, because such a rule will, given other assumptions, subtract the least from social wealth. Note that efficiency in this sense (called “Kaldor-Hicks” efficiency) does not require that costs be allocated justly between people. Justice, from the economists’ perspective, is a separate ideal. Some economists (not all) have argued that justice is a confused, contestable idea, and that society would be better off if tort rules were fashioned solely to advance efficiency.","PeriodicalId":135727,"journal":{"name":"Law and Economics for Civil Law Systems","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Coase Theorem\",\"authors\":\"R. Coase, LeRoy Fibre’s\",\"doi\":\"10.4337/9781788118262.00018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Recognizing that safety has costs, Coase and his followers think of an efficient rule as one that minimizes the sum of accident costs and prevention costs, because such a rule will, given other assumptions, subtract the least from social wealth. Note that efficiency in this sense (called “Kaldor-Hicks” efficiency) does not require that costs be allocated justly between people. Justice, from the economists’ perspective, is a separate ideal. Some economists (not all) have argued that justice is a confused, contestable idea, and that society would be better off if tort rules were fashioned solely to advance efficiency.\",\"PeriodicalId\":135727,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Law and Economics for Civil Law Systems\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Law and Economics for Civil Law Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788118262.00018\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law and Economics for Civil Law Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788118262.00018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

认识到安全是有成本的,科斯和他的追随者认为一个有效的规则是最小化事故成本和预防成本的总和,因为在其他假设下,这样的规则从社会财富中减去的最少。请注意,这种意义上的效率(称为“卡尔多-希克斯”效率)并不要求成本在人与人之间公平分配。从经济学家的角度来看,正义是一个独立的理想。一些经济学家(不是全部)认为,正义是一个令人困惑的、有争议的概念,如果侵权法的制定仅仅是为了提高效率,那么社会会变得更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Coase Theorem
Recognizing that safety has costs, Coase and his followers think of an efficient rule as one that minimizes the sum of accident costs and prevention costs, because such a rule will, given other assumptions, subtract the least from social wealth. Note that efficiency in this sense (called “Kaldor-Hicks” efficiency) does not require that costs be allocated justly between people. Justice, from the economists’ perspective, is a separate ideal. Some economists (not all) have argued that justice is a confused, contestable idea, and that society would be better off if tort rules were fashioned solely to advance efficiency.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信