{"title":"注:走向猜测的形式化","authors":"E. Trillas","doi":"10.1109/ISMVL.2011.51","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A possible way towards the formalization and use of the conjecture concept, in such a way that logical consequences, hypotheses, and speculations, do be particular types of conjectures, is presented. It is shown that conjectures and hypotheses are anti-monotonic, but speculations are neither monotonic, nor anti-monotonic, that is, they are the only purely non-monotonic conjectures.","PeriodicalId":234611,"journal":{"name":"2011 41st IEEE International Symposium on Multiple-Valued Logic","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Note: Towards a Formalization of Guessing\",\"authors\":\"E. Trillas\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ISMVL.2011.51\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A possible way towards the formalization and use of the conjecture concept, in such a way that logical consequences, hypotheses, and speculations, do be particular types of conjectures, is presented. It is shown that conjectures and hypotheses are anti-monotonic, but speculations are neither monotonic, nor anti-monotonic, that is, they are the only purely non-monotonic conjectures.\",\"PeriodicalId\":234611,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2011 41st IEEE International Symposium on Multiple-Valued Logic\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2011 41st IEEE International Symposium on Multiple-Valued Logic\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMVL.2011.51\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 41st IEEE International Symposium on Multiple-Valued Logic","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMVL.2011.51","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
A possible way towards the formalization and use of the conjecture concept, in such a way that logical consequences, hypotheses, and speculations, do be particular types of conjectures, is presented. It is shown that conjectures and hypotheses are anti-monotonic, but speculations are neither monotonic, nor anti-monotonic, that is, they are the only purely non-monotonic conjectures.