注:走向猜测的形式化

E. Trillas
{"title":"注:走向猜测的形式化","authors":"E. Trillas","doi":"10.1109/ISMVL.2011.51","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A possible way towards the formalization and use of the conjecture concept, in such a way that logical consequences, hypotheses, and speculations, do be particular types of conjectures, is presented. It is shown that conjectures and hypotheses are anti-monotonic, but speculations are neither monotonic, nor anti-monotonic, that is, they are the only purely non-monotonic conjectures.","PeriodicalId":234611,"journal":{"name":"2011 41st IEEE International Symposium on Multiple-Valued Logic","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Note: Towards a Formalization of Guessing\",\"authors\":\"E. Trillas\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ISMVL.2011.51\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A possible way towards the formalization and use of the conjecture concept, in such a way that logical consequences, hypotheses, and speculations, do be particular types of conjectures, is presented. It is shown that conjectures and hypotheses are anti-monotonic, but speculations are neither monotonic, nor anti-monotonic, that is, they are the only purely non-monotonic conjectures.\",\"PeriodicalId\":234611,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2011 41st IEEE International Symposium on Multiple-Valued Logic\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2011 41st IEEE International Symposium on Multiple-Valued Logic\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMVL.2011.51\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 41st IEEE International Symposium on Multiple-Valued Logic","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMVL.2011.51","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

提出了一种形式化和使用猜想概念的可能方法,即逻辑结果、假设和推测确实是猜想的特定类型。证明了猜想和假设是反单调的,但思辨既不是单调的,也不是反单调的,也就是说,它们是唯一的纯非单调的猜想。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Note: Towards a Formalization of Guessing
A possible way towards the formalization and use of the conjecture concept, in such a way that logical consequences, hypotheses, and speculations, do be particular types of conjectures, is presented. It is shown that conjectures and hypotheses are anti-monotonic, but speculations are neither monotonic, nor anti-monotonic, that is, they are the only purely non-monotonic conjectures.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信