Muhammad Abdel Hammed, Mohammed Tohammy, S. Mohammed, Walaa Ibrahim, Mostafaei Mohammad
{"title":"非糖尿病终末期肾病血液透析患者促红细胞生成素反应的预测因素","authors":"Muhammad Abdel Hammed, Mohammed Tohammy, S. Mohammed, Walaa Ibrahim, Mostafaei Mohammad","doi":"10.4103/jcmrp.jcmrp_61_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Erythropoietin (EPO) resistance is an essential health problem in end-stage renal-disease patients as it is associated with increased mortality. Despite combined intravenous iron usage, anemia exists substantially in the majority of patients, indicating the presence of other pathophysiological mechanisms such as inflammation that could lead to EPO resistance. Objectives To evaluate neutrophil-lymphocytic ratio (NLR) and platelet-lymphocytic ratio (PLR) as possible predictors of EPO resistance in nondiabetic patients on hemodialysis (HD). Patients and methods Fifty patients aged from 18 to 70 years old were diagnosed as end-stage renal disease and on HD regularly for more than 6 months and are receiving EPO therapy for at least more than 2 months. EPO dosing and intravenous iron supplementations given to HD patients and response assessment were following the 2012 Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcome guidelines. EPO resistance was assessed using EPO-stimulating agent (ESA) hyporesponsiveness index (EHRI), calculated as EPO weekly dose divided by body weight (kg) divided by hemoglobin level (Hb) and correlation with NLR, PLR, and C-reactive protein (CRP) was analyzed. EPO hyporesponsiveness (nonresponders) was diagnosed when we need to increase ESA doses up to 50% higher than the dose at which they were stable to maintain a steady Hb concentration after the first month of EPO treatment on weight-based dosing or after treatment with continuous EPO doses. Results Nonresponders to EPO had significantly higher EHRI, NLR, PLR, and CRP in comparison with responders. EHRI had a weak positive correlation with NLR (r = 0.18, P = 0.20), whereas it had a strong positive correlation with PLR (r = 0.65, P = 0.001). PLR at the cutoff point <116.5 has 90% sensitivity and 70% specificity for prediction of response to EPO therapy with overall accuracy that was 82% (area under curve [AUC]=0.79). Conclusion Inflammation is a major contributor in EPO resistance. CRP and PLR could represent cheap and simple parameters to predict response to EPO therapy in nondiabetic HD patients.","PeriodicalId":110854,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Current Medical Research and Practice","volume":"90 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predictors of erythropoietin response in nondiabetic end-stage renal-disease patients on hemodialysis\",\"authors\":\"Muhammad Abdel Hammed, Mohammed Tohammy, S. Mohammed, Walaa Ibrahim, Mostafaei Mohammad\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jcmrp.jcmrp_61_21\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background Erythropoietin (EPO) resistance is an essential health problem in end-stage renal-disease patients as it is associated with increased mortality. Despite combined intravenous iron usage, anemia exists substantially in the majority of patients, indicating the presence of other pathophysiological mechanisms such as inflammation that could lead to EPO resistance. Objectives To evaluate neutrophil-lymphocytic ratio (NLR) and platelet-lymphocytic ratio (PLR) as possible predictors of EPO resistance in nondiabetic patients on hemodialysis (HD). Patients and methods Fifty patients aged from 18 to 70 years old were diagnosed as end-stage renal disease and on HD regularly for more than 6 months and are receiving EPO therapy for at least more than 2 months. EPO dosing and intravenous iron supplementations given to HD patients and response assessment were following the 2012 Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcome guidelines. EPO resistance was assessed using EPO-stimulating agent (ESA) hyporesponsiveness index (EHRI), calculated as EPO weekly dose divided by body weight (kg) divided by hemoglobin level (Hb) and correlation with NLR, PLR, and C-reactive protein (CRP) was analyzed. EPO hyporesponsiveness (nonresponders) was diagnosed when we need to increase ESA doses up to 50% higher than the dose at which they were stable to maintain a steady Hb concentration after the first month of EPO treatment on weight-based dosing or after treatment with continuous EPO doses. Results Nonresponders to EPO had significantly higher EHRI, NLR, PLR, and CRP in comparison with responders. EHRI had a weak positive correlation with NLR (r = 0.18, P = 0.20), whereas it had a strong positive correlation with PLR (r = 0.65, P = 0.001). PLR at the cutoff point <116.5 has 90% sensitivity and 70% specificity for prediction of response to EPO therapy with overall accuracy that was 82% (area under curve [AUC]=0.79). Conclusion Inflammation is a major contributor in EPO resistance. CRP and PLR could represent cheap and simple parameters to predict response to EPO therapy in nondiabetic HD patients.\",\"PeriodicalId\":110854,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Current Medical Research and Practice\",\"volume\":\"90 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Current Medical Research and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jcmrp.jcmrp_61_21\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Current Medical Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jcmrp.jcmrp_61_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:促红细胞生成素(EPO)耐药性是终末期肾病患者的一个重要健康问题,因为它与死亡率增加有关。尽管联合静脉注射铁,大多数患者仍然存在贫血,这表明存在其他病理生理机制,如炎症,可导致EPO抵抗。目的探讨中性粒细胞-淋巴细胞比率(NLR)和血小板-淋巴细胞比率(PLR)对非糖尿病血液透析患者EPO耐药的预测作用。患者和方法50例患者,年龄18 ~ 70岁,诊断为终末期肾病,定期接受HD治疗6个月以上,并接受EPO治疗至少2个月以上。给HD患者的EPO剂量和静脉补铁以及疗效评估遵循2012年肾病改善全球结局指南。采用EPO刺激剂(ESA)低反应性指数(EHRI)评估EPO耐药性,计算方法为EPO周剂量除以体重(kg)除以血红蛋白水平(Hb),并分析与NLR、PLR和c反应蛋白(CRP)的相关性。EPO低反应性(无反应)被诊断为在EPO治疗的第一个月以体重为基础给药或连续给药后,我们需要将ESA剂量增加到稳定剂量的50%以上,以维持稳定的Hb浓度。结果与应答者相比,EPO无应答者的EHRI、NLR、PLR和CRP显著升高。EHRI与NLR呈弱正相关(r = 0.18, P = 0.20),与PLR呈强正相关(r = 0.65, P = 0.001)。截止点PLR <116.5时预测EPO治疗反应的敏感性为90%,特异性为70%,总体准确度为82%(曲线下面积[AUC]=0.79)。结论炎症是EPO耐药的主要因素。CRP和PLR可以作为预测非糖尿病性HD患者对EPO治疗反应的廉价和简单的参数。
Predictors of erythropoietin response in nondiabetic end-stage renal-disease patients on hemodialysis
Background Erythropoietin (EPO) resistance is an essential health problem in end-stage renal-disease patients as it is associated with increased mortality. Despite combined intravenous iron usage, anemia exists substantially in the majority of patients, indicating the presence of other pathophysiological mechanisms such as inflammation that could lead to EPO resistance. Objectives To evaluate neutrophil-lymphocytic ratio (NLR) and platelet-lymphocytic ratio (PLR) as possible predictors of EPO resistance in nondiabetic patients on hemodialysis (HD). Patients and methods Fifty patients aged from 18 to 70 years old were diagnosed as end-stage renal disease and on HD regularly for more than 6 months and are receiving EPO therapy for at least more than 2 months. EPO dosing and intravenous iron supplementations given to HD patients and response assessment were following the 2012 Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcome guidelines. EPO resistance was assessed using EPO-stimulating agent (ESA) hyporesponsiveness index (EHRI), calculated as EPO weekly dose divided by body weight (kg) divided by hemoglobin level (Hb) and correlation with NLR, PLR, and C-reactive protein (CRP) was analyzed. EPO hyporesponsiveness (nonresponders) was diagnosed when we need to increase ESA doses up to 50% higher than the dose at which they were stable to maintain a steady Hb concentration after the first month of EPO treatment on weight-based dosing or after treatment with continuous EPO doses. Results Nonresponders to EPO had significantly higher EHRI, NLR, PLR, and CRP in comparison with responders. EHRI had a weak positive correlation with NLR (r = 0.18, P = 0.20), whereas it had a strong positive correlation with PLR (r = 0.65, P = 0.001). PLR at the cutoff point <116.5 has 90% sensitivity and 70% specificity for prediction of response to EPO therapy with overall accuracy that was 82% (area under curve [AUC]=0.79). Conclusion Inflammation is a major contributor in EPO resistance. CRP and PLR could represent cheap and simple parameters to predict response to EPO therapy in nondiabetic HD patients.