{"title":"话题化的不对称:一个普通话视角","authors":"W. Liao","doi":"10.1109/NICS.2018.8606838","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Topicalization in Mandarin Chinese is compared with the previous studies of topicalization in English and Romance. We argue that the topicalization asymmetry found between arguments and circumstantial adjuncts, on the one hand, and manner adjuncts, on the other, suggests that there is no genuine argument-adjunct asymmetry in topicalization, but the asymmetry should be understood in terms of the movement-merger distinction, supporting the hypothesis made in Liliane Haegeman’s recent work.","PeriodicalId":137666,"journal":{"name":"2018 5th NAFOSTED Conference on Information and Computer Science (NICS)","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Asymmetry of Topicalization: a View from Mandarin Chinese\",\"authors\":\"W. Liao\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/NICS.2018.8606838\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Topicalization in Mandarin Chinese is compared with the previous studies of topicalization in English and Romance. We argue that the topicalization asymmetry found between arguments and circumstantial adjuncts, on the one hand, and manner adjuncts, on the other, suggests that there is no genuine argument-adjunct asymmetry in topicalization, but the asymmetry should be understood in terms of the movement-merger distinction, supporting the hypothesis made in Liliane Haegeman’s recent work.\",\"PeriodicalId\":137666,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 5th NAFOSTED Conference on Information and Computer Science (NICS)\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 5th NAFOSTED Conference on Information and Computer Science (NICS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/NICS.2018.8606838\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 5th NAFOSTED Conference on Information and Computer Science (NICS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/NICS.2018.8606838","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Asymmetry of Topicalization: a View from Mandarin Chinese
Topicalization in Mandarin Chinese is compared with the previous studies of topicalization in English and Romance. We argue that the topicalization asymmetry found between arguments and circumstantial adjuncts, on the one hand, and manner adjuncts, on the other, suggests that there is no genuine argument-adjunct asymmetry in topicalization, but the asymmetry should be understood in terms of the movement-merger distinction, supporting the hypothesis made in Liliane Haegeman’s recent work.