话题化的不对称:一个普通话视角

W. Liao
{"title":"话题化的不对称:一个普通话视角","authors":"W. Liao","doi":"10.1109/NICS.2018.8606838","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Topicalization in Mandarin Chinese is compared with the previous studies of topicalization in English and Romance. We argue that the topicalization asymmetry found between arguments and circumstantial adjuncts, on the one hand, and manner adjuncts, on the other, suggests that there is no genuine argument-adjunct asymmetry in topicalization, but the asymmetry should be understood in terms of the movement-merger distinction, supporting the hypothesis made in Liliane Haegeman’s recent work.","PeriodicalId":137666,"journal":{"name":"2018 5th NAFOSTED Conference on Information and Computer Science (NICS)","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Asymmetry of Topicalization: a View from Mandarin Chinese\",\"authors\":\"W. Liao\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/NICS.2018.8606838\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Topicalization in Mandarin Chinese is compared with the previous studies of topicalization in English and Romance. We argue that the topicalization asymmetry found between arguments and circumstantial adjuncts, on the one hand, and manner adjuncts, on the other, suggests that there is no genuine argument-adjunct asymmetry in topicalization, but the asymmetry should be understood in terms of the movement-merger distinction, supporting the hypothesis made in Liliane Haegeman’s recent work.\",\"PeriodicalId\":137666,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 5th NAFOSTED Conference on Information and Computer Science (NICS)\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 5th NAFOSTED Conference on Information and Computer Science (NICS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/NICS.2018.8606838\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 5th NAFOSTED Conference on Information and Computer Science (NICS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/NICS.2018.8606838","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文将汉语的话题化与英语和浪漫语的话题化研究进行了比较。我们认为,在论点和间接助词以及方式助词之间发现的话题化不对称表明,在话题化中不存在真正的论点-助词不对称,但这种不对称应该从运动-合并的区别来理解,这支持了Liliane Haegeman最近工作中提出的假设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Asymmetry of Topicalization: a View from Mandarin Chinese
Topicalization in Mandarin Chinese is compared with the previous studies of topicalization in English and Romance. We argue that the topicalization asymmetry found between arguments and circumstantial adjuncts, on the one hand, and manner adjuncts, on the other, suggests that there is no genuine argument-adjunct asymmetry in topicalization, but the asymmetry should be understood in terms of the movement-merger distinction, supporting the hypothesis made in Liliane Haegeman’s recent work.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信