联合相关与改进能量检测在频谱传感中的性能比较

Arati Halaki, Sanjeev Gurugopinath, R. Muralishankar
{"title":"联合相关与改进能量检测在频谱传感中的性能比较","authors":"Arati Halaki, Sanjeev Gurugopinath, R. Muralishankar","doi":"10.1109/DISCOVER47552.2019.9008099","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Spectrum sensing is a important feature in cognitive radios, wherein the idea is to detect the presence of the incumbent on a licensed spectrum. It is known that the improved energy detector (IED)- which calculates the sample norm of an optimally chosen order in the received observations - outperforms the conventional energy detector (ED). The relatively recently proposed joint correlation and energy detector (CED) combines the sample energy and the first order correlation values in the received observations, and it is known that when the combining is carried out optimally, it outperforms ED. We present a comparative performance study of CED and IED, for different incumbent signal models, following the Neyman-Pearson framework. We show that the CED consistently outperforms IED across the Gaussian, sinusoidal and constant signal models. Similar to what was reported earlier, the IED is observed to outperform ED only for low values of probability of false-alarm. Hence, this study establishes the applicability of CED for spectrum sensing, as opposed to IED and ED.","PeriodicalId":274260,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE International Conference on Distributed Computing, VLSI, Electrical Circuits and Robotics (DISCOVER)","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance Comparison of Joint Correlation and Improved Energy Detection for Spectrum Sensing\",\"authors\":\"Arati Halaki, Sanjeev Gurugopinath, R. Muralishankar\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/DISCOVER47552.2019.9008099\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Spectrum sensing is a important feature in cognitive radios, wherein the idea is to detect the presence of the incumbent on a licensed spectrum. It is known that the improved energy detector (IED)- which calculates the sample norm of an optimally chosen order in the received observations - outperforms the conventional energy detector (ED). The relatively recently proposed joint correlation and energy detector (CED) combines the sample energy and the first order correlation values in the received observations, and it is known that when the combining is carried out optimally, it outperforms ED. We present a comparative performance study of CED and IED, for different incumbent signal models, following the Neyman-Pearson framework. We show that the CED consistently outperforms IED across the Gaussian, sinusoidal and constant signal models. Similar to what was reported earlier, the IED is observed to outperform ED only for low values of probability of false-alarm. Hence, this study establishes the applicability of CED for spectrum sensing, as opposed to IED and ED.\",\"PeriodicalId\":274260,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2019 IEEE International Conference on Distributed Computing, VLSI, Electrical Circuits and Robotics (DISCOVER)\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2019 IEEE International Conference on Distributed Computing, VLSI, Electrical Circuits and Robotics (DISCOVER)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/DISCOVER47552.2019.9008099\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 IEEE International Conference on Distributed Computing, VLSI, Electrical Circuits and Robotics (DISCOVER)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/DISCOVER47552.2019.9008099","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

频谱感知是认知无线电的一个重要特征,其思想是在许可频谱上检测在位者的存在。已知改进的能量探测器(IED)在接收到的观测值中计算最优选择顺序的样本范数,其性能优于传统的能量探测器(ED)。最近提出的联合相关和能量检测器(CED)结合了接收到的观测数据中的样本能量和一阶相关值,并且已知当最佳结合时,它优于ED。我们根据Neyman-Pearson框架,对不同的在位信号模型进行了CED和IED的性能比较研究。我们表明,在高斯、正弦和常数信号模型中,CED始终优于IED。与前面报道的类似,观察到IED仅在误报概率较低的情况下才优于ED。因此,本研究确立了相对于IED和ED, CED在频谱传感方面的适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Performance Comparison of Joint Correlation and Improved Energy Detection for Spectrum Sensing
Spectrum sensing is a important feature in cognitive radios, wherein the idea is to detect the presence of the incumbent on a licensed spectrum. It is known that the improved energy detector (IED)- which calculates the sample norm of an optimally chosen order in the received observations - outperforms the conventional energy detector (ED). The relatively recently proposed joint correlation and energy detector (CED) combines the sample energy and the first order correlation values in the received observations, and it is known that when the combining is carried out optimally, it outperforms ED. We present a comparative performance study of CED and IED, for different incumbent signal models, following the Neyman-Pearson framework. We show that the CED consistently outperforms IED across the Gaussian, sinusoidal and constant signal models. Similar to what was reported earlier, the IED is observed to outperform ED only for low values of probability of false-alarm. Hence, this study establishes the applicability of CED for spectrum sensing, as opposed to IED and ED.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信