关于长期增长的衡量

Rafael R. Guthmann
{"title":"关于长期增长的衡量","authors":"Rafael R. Guthmann","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3290847","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Methodologies for the construction of national accounts often differ across time and countries. This paper discusses issues raised by this methodological heterogeneity on the long-run measure of economic growth and presents two sets of internationally comparable estimates of GDP for the period from 1820 to 2018. The estimates are based on real product benchmarks relative to a reference economy. The reference economy’s GDP time series is a normalized composite of several indices. The US and the UK are used as reference economies producing two sets of estimates. These estimates suggest less variation in incomes among developed economies than those of the 2018 version of the Maddison Project, are closer to Maddison’s original estimates, and suggest that both these datasets underestimated growth in the more distant past relative to more recent decades.","PeriodicalId":135206,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Measurement & Data on National Income & Product Accounts (Topic)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the Measurement of Growth Over the Long Run\",\"authors\":\"Rafael R. Guthmann\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3290847\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Methodologies for the construction of national accounts often differ across time and countries. This paper discusses issues raised by this methodological heterogeneity on the long-run measure of economic growth and presents two sets of internationally comparable estimates of GDP for the period from 1820 to 2018. The estimates are based on real product benchmarks relative to a reference economy. The reference economy’s GDP time series is a normalized composite of several indices. The US and the UK are used as reference economies producing two sets of estimates. These estimates suggest less variation in incomes among developed economies than those of the 2018 version of the Maddison Project, are closer to Maddison’s original estimates, and suggest that both these datasets underestimated growth in the more distant past relative to more recent decades.\",\"PeriodicalId\":135206,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERN: Measurement & Data on National Income & Product Accounts (Topic)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-08-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERN: Measurement & Data on National Income & Product Accounts (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3290847\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Measurement & Data on National Income & Product Accounts (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3290847","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

构建国民核算的方法往往因时间和国家而异。本文讨论了经济增长长期衡量方法异质性所带来的问题,并提出了1820年至2018年期间两组具有国际可比性的GDP估计值。这些估计是基于相对于参考经济体的实际产品基准。参考经济体的GDP时间序列是几个指标的归一化组合。美国和英国被用作参考经济体,得出两套估算值。这些估计表明,发达经济体之间的收入差异比麦迪森计划2018年版本的估计要小,更接近麦迪森最初的估计,并且表明,相对于最近几十年,这两个数据集都低估了更遥远过去的增长。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
On the Measurement of Growth Over the Long Run
Methodologies for the construction of national accounts often differ across time and countries. This paper discusses issues raised by this methodological heterogeneity on the long-run measure of economic growth and presents two sets of internationally comparable estimates of GDP for the period from 1820 to 2018. The estimates are based on real product benchmarks relative to a reference economy. The reference economy’s GDP time series is a normalized composite of several indices. The US and the UK are used as reference economies producing two sets of estimates. These estimates suggest less variation in incomes among developed economies than those of the 2018 version of the Maddison Project, are closer to Maddison’s original estimates, and suggest that both these datasets underestimated growth in the more distant past relative to more recent decades.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信