同意的节奏:弗朗西斯·巴顿·冈米尔、抒情节奏和白人诗学

V. Jackson
{"title":"同意的节奏:弗朗西斯·巴顿·冈米尔、抒情节奏和白人诗学","authors":"V. Jackson","doi":"10.5422/fordham/9780823282043.003.0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In American poetics, lyric and rhythm share a history—and since this is America, it is a racialized history. This essay considers Francis Barton Gummere’s contributions to that history. Although most Anglo-American literary critics have never heard of Gummere, many of the assumptions of that criticism were first articulated by him between 1891 and 1911. By returning to Gummere’s now historically obscure logic, we might begin to trace the overdetermined origins of current critical versions of lyric rhythm as natural culture and to imagine an alternative history of American poetics, a history of the poetics of rhythm not modeled on naturalized (and thus racialized) concepts of culture, on English prosody, or on common sense; an alternative that acknowledges the contradictions of any notion of a shared Anglo-American rhythm or shared Anglo-American poetry, a history in which the idea of rhythm remains central, but central as symptom rather than central as solution.","PeriodicalId":278197,"journal":{"name":"Critical Rhythm","volume":"115 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Cadence of Consent: Francis Barton Gummere, Lyric Rhythm, and White Poetics\",\"authors\":\"V. Jackson\",\"doi\":\"10.5422/fordham/9780823282043.003.0005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In American poetics, lyric and rhythm share a history—and since this is America, it is a racialized history. This essay considers Francis Barton Gummere’s contributions to that history. Although most Anglo-American literary critics have never heard of Gummere, many of the assumptions of that criticism were first articulated by him between 1891 and 1911. By returning to Gummere’s now historically obscure logic, we might begin to trace the overdetermined origins of current critical versions of lyric rhythm as natural culture and to imagine an alternative history of American poetics, a history of the poetics of rhythm not modeled on naturalized (and thus racialized) concepts of culture, on English prosody, or on common sense; an alternative that acknowledges the contradictions of any notion of a shared Anglo-American rhythm or shared Anglo-American poetry, a history in which the idea of rhythm remains central, but central as symptom rather than central as solution.\",\"PeriodicalId\":278197,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical Rhythm\",\"volume\":\"115 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical Rhythm\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5422/fordham/9780823282043.003.0005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Rhythm","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5422/fordham/9780823282043.003.0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

在美国诗学中,抒情和节奏有着共同的历史——既然这是美国,那就是一段种族化的历史。本文考察了弗朗西斯·巴顿·冈米尔对这段历史的贡献。尽管大多数英美文学评论家从未听说过冈米尔,但他在1891年至1911年间首次提出了这种批评的许多假设。通过回到冈米尔现在历史上模糊的逻辑,我们可以开始追溯作为自然文化的抒情节奏的当前批评版本的过度确定的起源,并想象美国诗学的另一种历史,一种不以自然化(因此种族化)文化概念为模型的节奏诗学的历史,在英国韵律,或常识;另一种选择是承认任何关于共同的英美节奏或共同的英美诗歌的概念的矛盾,在这段历史中,节奏的概念仍然是核心,但作为症状而不是作为解决方案的核心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Cadence of Consent: Francis Barton Gummere, Lyric Rhythm, and White Poetics
In American poetics, lyric and rhythm share a history—and since this is America, it is a racialized history. This essay considers Francis Barton Gummere’s contributions to that history. Although most Anglo-American literary critics have never heard of Gummere, many of the assumptions of that criticism were first articulated by him between 1891 and 1911. By returning to Gummere’s now historically obscure logic, we might begin to trace the overdetermined origins of current critical versions of lyric rhythm as natural culture and to imagine an alternative history of American poetics, a history of the poetics of rhythm not modeled on naturalized (and thus racialized) concepts of culture, on English prosody, or on common sense; an alternative that acknowledges the contradictions of any notion of a shared Anglo-American rhythm or shared Anglo-American poetry, a history in which the idea of rhythm remains central, but central as symptom rather than central as solution.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信