SCALPEL GHOST法在100kv电子投影光刻中的对比评价

F. Koba, H. Yamashita, E. Nomura, K. Nakajima, H. Nozue
{"title":"SCALPEL GHOST法在100kv电子投影光刻中的对比评价","authors":"F. Koba, H. Yamashita, E. Nomura, K. Nakajima, H. Nozue","doi":"10.1109/IMNC.2000.872653","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Electron projection lithography (EPL) techniques, such as SCALPEL and PREVAIL, are expected to be candidates for fabricating 80-nm devices or less. In electron-beam lithography, the proximity effect correction (PEC) is the most critical issue for obtaining sufficient dimension accuracy and good resist pattern profiles. The SCALPEL GHOST method, proposed by Watson et al. (1995), has a remarkable advantage to throughput by doing both the pattern and correction exposures, simultaneously. This method, however, degrades the exposure intensity contrast due to a larger background dose than that in other PEC methods, such as pattern modification. In this paper, we investigate the essential conditions for the SCALPEL GHOST PEC to achieve 80-nm resolution in 100 kV EFL in terms of the exposure intensity contrast.","PeriodicalId":270640,"journal":{"name":"Digest of Papers Microprocesses and Nanotechnology 2000. 2000 International Microprocesses and Nanotechnology Conference (IEEE Cat. No.00EX387)","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Contrast evaluation of SCALPEL GHOST method in 100 kV electron projection lithography\",\"authors\":\"F. Koba, H. Yamashita, E. Nomura, K. Nakajima, H. Nozue\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IMNC.2000.872653\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Electron projection lithography (EPL) techniques, such as SCALPEL and PREVAIL, are expected to be candidates for fabricating 80-nm devices or less. In electron-beam lithography, the proximity effect correction (PEC) is the most critical issue for obtaining sufficient dimension accuracy and good resist pattern profiles. The SCALPEL GHOST method, proposed by Watson et al. (1995), has a remarkable advantage to throughput by doing both the pattern and correction exposures, simultaneously. This method, however, degrades the exposure intensity contrast due to a larger background dose than that in other PEC methods, such as pattern modification. In this paper, we investigate the essential conditions for the SCALPEL GHOST PEC to achieve 80-nm resolution in 100 kV EFL in terms of the exposure intensity contrast.\",\"PeriodicalId\":270640,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Digest of Papers Microprocesses and Nanotechnology 2000. 2000 International Microprocesses and Nanotechnology Conference (IEEE Cat. No.00EX387)\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-07-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Digest of Papers Microprocesses and Nanotechnology 2000. 2000 International Microprocesses and Nanotechnology Conference (IEEE Cat. No.00EX387)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IMNC.2000.872653\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digest of Papers Microprocesses and Nanotechnology 2000. 2000 International Microprocesses and Nanotechnology Conference (IEEE Cat. No.00EX387)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IMNC.2000.872653","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

电子投影光刻(EPL)技术,如SCALPEL和precepl,有望成为制造80纳米或更小器件的候选技术。在电子束光刻中,要获得足够的尺寸精度和良好的抗蚀斑轮廓,邻近效应校正是最关键的问题。Watson等人(1995)提出的SCALPEL GHOST方法通过同时进行模式曝光和校正曝光,在吞吐量方面具有显著优势。然而,由于本底剂量比其他PEC方法(如图案修饰)大,该方法降低了暴露强度对比度。本文从曝光强度对比方面研究了SCALPEL GHOST PEC在100 kV EFL下达到80 nm分辨率的必要条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Contrast evaluation of SCALPEL GHOST method in 100 kV electron projection lithography
Electron projection lithography (EPL) techniques, such as SCALPEL and PREVAIL, are expected to be candidates for fabricating 80-nm devices or less. In electron-beam lithography, the proximity effect correction (PEC) is the most critical issue for obtaining sufficient dimension accuracy and good resist pattern profiles. The SCALPEL GHOST method, proposed by Watson et al. (1995), has a remarkable advantage to throughput by doing both the pattern and correction exposures, simultaneously. This method, however, degrades the exposure intensity contrast due to a larger background dose than that in other PEC methods, such as pattern modification. In this paper, we investigate the essential conditions for the SCALPEL GHOST PEC to achieve 80-nm resolution in 100 kV EFL in terms of the exposure intensity contrast.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信