重新思考预防刑法的基本理念

Dongyan Lao
{"title":"重新思考预防刑法的基本理念","authors":"Dongyan Lao","doi":"10.1080/20517483.2023.2223844","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Law is expected to shoulder the two-dimension values of meaning and function, and neither should be neglected. Witnessing the great changes and transformations taking place in the present society, this article attempts to explore how the doctrinal system of criminal law should respond to the propositions raised by the society and balance the two-dimension values of meaning and function. A reasonable doctrinal system should be able to not only improve its responsiveness to the external surroundings, but also maintain its autonomy itself. The basic idea of criminal law is a meta-theory which determines the direction of how to construct the doctrinal system of criminal law. From the perspective of the relationship between the dimension of function and the dimension of meaning of law, the basic ideas and its corresponding doctrinal systems of criminal law can be categorized as three schemes: the classical scheme (or autonomous scheme), the responsive scheme and the reflexive-functionalist scheme. This article put forwards the reflexive-functionalist scheme, and advocates an introduction of constitutional review in a substantive level, so as to achieve a balance between the two-dimension values of meaning and function in constructing the doctrinal system of criminal law.","PeriodicalId":108655,"journal":{"name":"Peking University Law Journal","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rethink the basic idea of preventive criminal law\",\"authors\":\"Dongyan Lao\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/20517483.2023.2223844\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Law is expected to shoulder the two-dimension values of meaning and function, and neither should be neglected. Witnessing the great changes and transformations taking place in the present society, this article attempts to explore how the doctrinal system of criminal law should respond to the propositions raised by the society and balance the two-dimension values of meaning and function. A reasonable doctrinal system should be able to not only improve its responsiveness to the external surroundings, but also maintain its autonomy itself. The basic idea of criminal law is a meta-theory which determines the direction of how to construct the doctrinal system of criminal law. From the perspective of the relationship between the dimension of function and the dimension of meaning of law, the basic ideas and its corresponding doctrinal systems of criminal law can be categorized as three schemes: the classical scheme (or autonomous scheme), the responsive scheme and the reflexive-functionalist scheme. This article put forwards the reflexive-functionalist scheme, and advocates an introduction of constitutional review in a substantive level, so as to achieve a balance between the two-dimension values of meaning and function in constructing the doctrinal system of criminal law.\",\"PeriodicalId\":108655,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Peking University Law Journal\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Peking University Law Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/20517483.2023.2223844\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Peking University Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20517483.2023.2223844","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

法律肩负着意义和功能的双重价值,两者都不容忽视。面对当今社会的巨大变化和转型,本文试图探讨刑法理论体系应如何回应社会提出的命题,平衡意义与功能的二元价值。一个合理的教义体系既要能够提高其对外部环境的响应能力,又要能够保持其自身的自主性。刑法基本思想是一种元理论,它决定了刑法理论体系建构的方向。从功能维度与法律意义维度的关系来看,刑法的基本理念及其相应的理论体系可以划分为三种模式:经典模式(或自治模式)、回应模式和反思性功能模式。本文提出了反思性功能主义方案,主张在实体层面引入合宪性审查,从而在构建刑法理论体系中实现意义与功能两个维度价值的平衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Rethink the basic idea of preventive criminal law
ABSTRACT Law is expected to shoulder the two-dimension values of meaning and function, and neither should be neglected. Witnessing the great changes and transformations taking place in the present society, this article attempts to explore how the doctrinal system of criminal law should respond to the propositions raised by the society and balance the two-dimension values of meaning and function. A reasonable doctrinal system should be able to not only improve its responsiveness to the external surroundings, but also maintain its autonomy itself. The basic idea of criminal law is a meta-theory which determines the direction of how to construct the doctrinal system of criminal law. From the perspective of the relationship between the dimension of function and the dimension of meaning of law, the basic ideas and its corresponding doctrinal systems of criminal law can be categorized as three schemes: the classical scheme (or autonomous scheme), the responsive scheme and the reflexive-functionalist scheme. This article put forwards the reflexive-functionalist scheme, and advocates an introduction of constitutional review in a substantive level, so as to achieve a balance between the two-dimension values of meaning and function in constructing the doctrinal system of criminal law.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信