{"title":"国际分裂时期的政治传播","authors":"Andrey G. Bolshakov, Eugenia V. Khramova","doi":"10.5922/sikbfu-2023-2-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The avalanche-like nature of information flows has led today to the destructuring of all communication links in the world. Political communications under these conditions look more and more like channels with expanding \"black boxes\" and improperly used \"white noise\". The purpose of this analysis is to identify the specifics of political communication under conditions of international bifurcations. The methodology of the analysis is based on the symbiosis of modern theories: mathematical modeling of communication by C. Shannon and W. Weaver, political cybernetics by D. Easton, political communication by D. J. Lilleker and P. Lazarsfeld, crisis communication by R. Ulmer, T. Sellnau and M. Seager, and game theory with opposing interests. According to the results of the analysis the specific characteristics of modern political communication are distinguished: its technological (not process) character, non-classical interaction of the communicator and the communicant in it, the transformation of the communicant into a \"black box\", and the manipulative attitude to the communicator. It is possible to draw a basic conclusion about the transformation of classical political communications from the process of information transfer into the technology of mutual interaction of its participants in a manipulative format for political decision-making.","PeriodicalId":104739,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik of Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University Series Humanities and social science","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"POLITICAL COMMUNICATION IN THE PERIOD OF INTERNATIONAL BIFURCATIONS\",\"authors\":\"Andrey G. Bolshakov, Eugenia V. Khramova\",\"doi\":\"10.5922/sikbfu-2023-2-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The avalanche-like nature of information flows has led today to the destructuring of all communication links in the world. Political communications under these conditions look more and more like channels with expanding \\\"black boxes\\\" and improperly used \\\"white noise\\\". The purpose of this analysis is to identify the specifics of political communication under conditions of international bifurcations. The methodology of the analysis is based on the symbiosis of modern theories: mathematical modeling of communication by C. Shannon and W. Weaver, political cybernetics by D. Easton, political communication by D. J. Lilleker and P. Lazarsfeld, crisis communication by R. Ulmer, T. Sellnau and M. Seager, and game theory with opposing interests. According to the results of the analysis the specific characteristics of modern political communication are distinguished: its technological (not process) character, non-classical interaction of the communicator and the communicant in it, the transformation of the communicant into a \\\"black box\\\", and the manipulative attitude to the communicator. It is possible to draw a basic conclusion about the transformation of classical political communications from the process of information transfer into the technology of mutual interaction of its participants in a manipulative format for political decision-making.\",\"PeriodicalId\":104739,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vestnik of Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University Series Humanities and social science\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vestnik of Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University Series Humanities and social science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5922/sikbfu-2023-2-9\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vestnik of Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University Series Humanities and social science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5922/sikbfu-2023-2-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
今天,信息流的雪崩性质导致了世界上所有通信链路的破坏。在这种情况下,政治沟通越来越像不断扩大的“黑盒子”和使用不当的“白噪音”渠道。这一分析的目的是确定在国际分歧条件下政治传播的具体情况。分析方法基于现代理论的共生:C. Shannon和W. Weaver的传播数学建模,D. Easton的政治控制论,D. J. Lilleker和P. Lazarsfeld的政治传播,R. Ulmer、T. Sellnau和M. Seager的危机传播,以及利益对立的博弈论。根据分析结果,区分出现代政治传播的具体特征:其技术性(而非过程性)、传播者与传播者在其中的非经典互动、传播者向“黑盒子”的转变、对传播者的操纵态度。古典政治传播从信息传递过程转变为参与者以政治决策的操纵形式相互反应的技术,可以得出一个基本结论。
POLITICAL COMMUNICATION IN THE PERIOD OF INTERNATIONAL BIFURCATIONS
The avalanche-like nature of information flows has led today to the destructuring of all communication links in the world. Political communications under these conditions look more and more like channels with expanding "black boxes" and improperly used "white noise". The purpose of this analysis is to identify the specifics of political communication under conditions of international bifurcations. The methodology of the analysis is based on the symbiosis of modern theories: mathematical modeling of communication by C. Shannon and W. Weaver, political cybernetics by D. Easton, political communication by D. J. Lilleker and P. Lazarsfeld, crisis communication by R. Ulmer, T. Sellnau and M. Seager, and game theory with opposing interests. According to the results of the analysis the specific characteristics of modern political communication are distinguished: its technological (not process) character, non-classical interaction of the communicator and the communicant in it, the transformation of the communicant into a "black box", and the manipulative attitude to the communicator. It is possible to draw a basic conclusion about the transformation of classical political communications from the process of information transfer into the technology of mutual interaction of its participants in a manipulative format for political decision-making.