数字身份管理系统分析——双映射视图

Jianwei Liu, Adam Hodges, Lucas Clay, J. Monarch
{"title":"数字身份管理系统分析——双映射视图","authors":"Jianwei Liu, Adam Hodges, Lucas Clay, J. Monarch","doi":"10.1109/BRAINS49436.2020.9223281","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Digital identity is essential to almost all information systems. This paper provides a new perspective for reducing digital identity management systems (DIMS) to two mappings, the core operations on the mappings, and the trust model built around the mappings. Using this two-mapping view, we derive criteria for determining whether a DIMS solution is self-sovereign. We also compare decentralized identity management solutions with the traditional centralized identity management solutions. From the comparison and analysis, we have the following findings. The differences between decentralized and centralized solutions stem from the trust model differences which dictate storage scheme differences, and therefore other operation-level differences. With a more trustless trust model and storage scheme, current decentralized solutions can be promising candidates for self-sovereign DIMS. Design considerations and certain limitations of the current decentralized solutions are analyzed based on the two-mapping view as well, which can provide useful directions to further study.","PeriodicalId":315392,"journal":{"name":"2020 2nd Conference on Blockchain Research & Applications for Innovative Networks and Services (BRAINS)","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An analysis of digital identity management systems - a two-mapping view\",\"authors\":\"Jianwei Liu, Adam Hodges, Lucas Clay, J. Monarch\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/BRAINS49436.2020.9223281\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Digital identity is essential to almost all information systems. This paper provides a new perspective for reducing digital identity management systems (DIMS) to two mappings, the core operations on the mappings, and the trust model built around the mappings. Using this two-mapping view, we derive criteria for determining whether a DIMS solution is self-sovereign. We also compare decentralized identity management solutions with the traditional centralized identity management solutions. From the comparison and analysis, we have the following findings. The differences between decentralized and centralized solutions stem from the trust model differences which dictate storage scheme differences, and therefore other operation-level differences. With a more trustless trust model and storage scheme, current decentralized solutions can be promising candidates for self-sovereign DIMS. Design considerations and certain limitations of the current decentralized solutions are analyzed based on the two-mapping view as well, which can provide useful directions to further study.\",\"PeriodicalId\":315392,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2020 2nd Conference on Blockchain Research & Applications for Innovative Networks and Services (BRAINS)\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2020 2nd Conference on Blockchain Research & Applications for Innovative Networks and Services (BRAINS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/BRAINS49436.2020.9223281\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 2nd Conference on Blockchain Research & Applications for Innovative Networks and Services (BRAINS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/BRAINS49436.2020.9223281","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

数字身份对几乎所有信息系统都至关重要。本文为将数字身份管理系统(DIMS)简化为两个映射、映射上的核心操作和围绕映射构建的信任模型提供了新的视角。使用这个双映射视图,我们推导出确定DIMS解决方案是否自主的标准。我们还比较了分散的身份管理解决方案与传统的集中式身份管理解决方案。通过比较和分析,我们有以下发现。分散和集中式解决方案之间的差异源于信任模型的差异,信任模型的差异决定了存储方案的差异,因此也导致了其他操作级别的差异。有了更加不可信的信任模型和存储方案,目前的分散解决方案可以成为自主DIMS的有希望的候选者。基于双映射视图分析了现有分散方案的设计考虑和局限性,为进一步研究提供了有益的方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An analysis of digital identity management systems - a two-mapping view
Digital identity is essential to almost all information systems. This paper provides a new perspective for reducing digital identity management systems (DIMS) to two mappings, the core operations on the mappings, and the trust model built around the mappings. Using this two-mapping view, we derive criteria for determining whether a DIMS solution is self-sovereign. We also compare decentralized identity management solutions with the traditional centralized identity management solutions. From the comparison and analysis, we have the following findings. The differences between decentralized and centralized solutions stem from the trust model differences which dictate storage scheme differences, and therefore other operation-level differences. With a more trustless trust model and storage scheme, current decentralized solutions can be promising candidates for self-sovereign DIMS. Design considerations and certain limitations of the current decentralized solutions are analyzed based on the two-mapping view as well, which can provide useful directions to further study.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信