{"title":"冲突之门:信仰社群的沟通、象征空间与差异建构","authors":"E. Novek","doi":"10.1080/15456870209367415","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Marking symbolic boundaries is an essential act of group identity. But the imaginary borders that unite some antagonize others; real‐world tensions evolve from these metaphoric moves of inclusion and exclusion. In two case studies of conflict over metaphorical boundaries erected by members of religious faiths, this paper demonstrates how symbolic communication devices have consequences both inside and outside the boundaries they set out to establish.","PeriodicalId":113832,"journal":{"name":"New Jersey Journal of Communication","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gates of conflict: Communication, symbolic spaces and the construction of difference in faith communities\",\"authors\":\"E. Novek\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15456870209367415\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Marking symbolic boundaries is an essential act of group identity. But the imaginary borders that unite some antagonize others; real‐world tensions evolve from these metaphoric moves of inclusion and exclusion. In two case studies of conflict over metaphorical boundaries erected by members of religious faiths, this paper demonstrates how symbolic communication devices have consequences both inside and outside the boundaries they set out to establish.\",\"PeriodicalId\":113832,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New Jersey Journal of Communication\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New Jersey Journal of Communication\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15456870209367415\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Jersey Journal of Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15456870209367415","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Gates of conflict: Communication, symbolic spaces and the construction of difference in faith communities
Marking symbolic boundaries is an essential act of group identity. But the imaginary borders that unite some antagonize others; real‐world tensions evolve from these metaphoric moves of inclusion and exclusion. In two case studies of conflict over metaphorical boundaries erected by members of religious faiths, this paper demonstrates how symbolic communication devices have consequences both inside and outside the boundaries they set out to establish.