改进临时取用物品和文件时的检辩策略

I. Rohatiuk
{"title":"改进临时取用物品和文件时的检辩策略","authors":"I. Rohatiuk","doi":"10.56215/01211214.66","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article contains the main recommendations for improving the activities of the prosecution and the defense in criminal proceedings when applying the measure of restraint of criminal proceedings - temporary access to things and documents. In the course of investigation, the prosecutor, investigator, and coroner in almost every proceeding need to seize any data storage devices that may be evidence of a crime. In turn, defense counsels are also increasingly using their powers to provide temporary access to things and documents. The practice of applying this measure to ensure criminal proceedings shows a large number of mistakes made by the parties to criminal proceedings, and as a result, this measure is not implemented, the court refuses to make a decision and, accordingly, the goal is not achieved. The purpose of the article is to improve the quality of temporary access to things and documents by the parties to criminal proceedings, to obtain positive practice of court decisions on such access and to obtain results for ensuring the objectives of criminal proceedings. Methodology. To achieve this goal, the author uses the formal logical method, systemic and structural, comparative legal and statistical methods. Scientific novelty. The author compares the procedural and tactical capabilities of different parties to criminal proceedings - the prosecution and the defense. The author identifies the typical mistakes they make in the course of their activities during temporary access to things and documents. With this in mind, the author makes proposals for improving both the general tactics inherent in both parties to the process and the specific tactical and procedural actions and techniques inherent in each individual. Conclusions. A number of recommendations for prosecutors, investigators and attorneys-at-law have been made with the aim of improving the quality of the parties to criminal proceedings during temporary access to things and documents","PeriodicalId":111799,"journal":{"name":"Naukovij vìsnik Nacìonalʹnoï akademìï vnutrìšnìh sprav","volume":"75 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving the Tactics of the Prosecution and Defense during Temporary Access to Things and Documents\",\"authors\":\"I. Rohatiuk\",\"doi\":\"10.56215/01211214.66\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article contains the main recommendations for improving the activities of the prosecution and the defense in criminal proceedings when applying the measure of restraint of criminal proceedings - temporary access to things and documents. In the course of investigation, the prosecutor, investigator, and coroner in almost every proceeding need to seize any data storage devices that may be evidence of a crime. In turn, defense counsels are also increasingly using their powers to provide temporary access to things and documents. The practice of applying this measure to ensure criminal proceedings shows a large number of mistakes made by the parties to criminal proceedings, and as a result, this measure is not implemented, the court refuses to make a decision and, accordingly, the goal is not achieved. The purpose of the article is to improve the quality of temporary access to things and documents by the parties to criminal proceedings, to obtain positive practice of court decisions on such access and to obtain results for ensuring the objectives of criminal proceedings. Methodology. To achieve this goal, the author uses the formal logical method, systemic and structural, comparative legal and statistical methods. Scientific novelty. The author compares the procedural and tactical capabilities of different parties to criminal proceedings - the prosecution and the defense. The author identifies the typical mistakes they make in the course of their activities during temporary access to things and documents. With this in mind, the author makes proposals for improving both the general tactics inherent in both parties to the process and the specific tactical and procedural actions and techniques inherent in each individual. Conclusions. A number of recommendations for prosecutors, investigators and attorneys-at-law have been made with the aim of improving the quality of the parties to criminal proceedings during temporary access to things and documents\",\"PeriodicalId\":111799,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Naukovij vìsnik Nacìonalʹnoï akademìï vnutrìšnìh sprav\",\"volume\":\"75 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Naukovij vìsnik Nacìonalʹnoï akademìï vnutrìšnìh sprav\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.56215/01211214.66\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Naukovij vìsnik Nacìonalʹnoï akademìï vnutrìšnìh sprav","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56215/01211214.66","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文提出了改进刑事诉讼中控方和辩护方在适用刑事诉讼限制措施-临时查阅物品和文件时的行为的主要建议。在调查过程中,检察官、调查员和验尸官几乎在每一个程序中都需要没收任何可能作为犯罪证据的数据存储设备。反过来,辩护律师也越来越多地利用他们的权力提供临时访问的东西和文件。适用这一措施以确保刑事诉讼的做法表明,刑事诉讼各方犯了大量错误,结果,这一措施没有得到执行,法院拒绝作出决定,因此,目标没有实现。该条的目的是为了提高刑事诉讼当事人临时查阅物品和文件的质量,获得法院对此类查阅的积极做法,并取得确保刑事诉讼目标的结果。方法。为了达到这一目的,作者运用了形式逻辑方法、系统结构方法、比较法律方法和统计方法。科学的新奇。笔者比较了刑事诉讼各方——控方和辩方的程序和策略能力。作者指出了他们在临时访问事物和文件的活动过程中犯的典型错误。考虑到这一点,作者提出了改进过程双方固有的一般战术以及每个人固有的具体战术和程序行动和技术的建议。结论。为检察官、调查人员和律师提出了一些建议,目的是提高刑事诉讼各方在临时查阅物品和文件期间的素质
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Improving the Tactics of the Prosecution and Defense during Temporary Access to Things and Documents
The article contains the main recommendations for improving the activities of the prosecution and the defense in criminal proceedings when applying the measure of restraint of criminal proceedings - temporary access to things and documents. In the course of investigation, the prosecutor, investigator, and coroner in almost every proceeding need to seize any data storage devices that may be evidence of a crime. In turn, defense counsels are also increasingly using their powers to provide temporary access to things and documents. The practice of applying this measure to ensure criminal proceedings shows a large number of mistakes made by the parties to criminal proceedings, and as a result, this measure is not implemented, the court refuses to make a decision and, accordingly, the goal is not achieved. The purpose of the article is to improve the quality of temporary access to things and documents by the parties to criminal proceedings, to obtain positive practice of court decisions on such access and to obtain results for ensuring the objectives of criminal proceedings. Methodology. To achieve this goal, the author uses the formal logical method, systemic and structural, comparative legal and statistical methods. Scientific novelty. The author compares the procedural and tactical capabilities of different parties to criminal proceedings - the prosecution and the defense. The author identifies the typical mistakes they make in the course of their activities during temporary access to things and documents. With this in mind, the author makes proposals for improving both the general tactics inherent in both parties to the process and the specific tactical and procedural actions and techniques inherent in each individual. Conclusions. A number of recommendations for prosecutors, investigators and attorneys-at-law have been made with the aim of improving the quality of the parties to criminal proceedings during temporary access to things and documents
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信