某私立医学院医学生对在线评估的看法

S. Iftikhar, Khalid Mahmood Cheema
{"title":"某私立医学院医学生对在线评估的看法","authors":"S. Iftikhar, Khalid Mahmood Cheema","doi":"10.53708/hpej.v5i2.1258","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: During COVID-19 lockdown, Shalamar Medical College opted for an unproctored online formative assessment. Medical institutes have conducted online assessments before COVID-19 and literature presents contrasting views on its acceptability by teachers and students alike. \nObjective: This study aims to determine medical students’ perception of the unproctored online assessments. \nMethods: A survey questionnaire was disseminated through Google forms to all MBBS students of SMDC on WhatsApp. Consent to take part in the survey was added to the questionnaire and students consenting to be a part of the survey were requested to fill in the questionnaire. The questionnaire consisted of closed ended as well as open-ended questions. The data was analyzed by IBM SPSS 20. \nResults: Network issues are believed to be a major issue in taking online tests (83%) and 45% of the students feel it is more difficult to take an online test. Fifty-eight percent of the students feel it is easy to cheat on online tests. A considerable number of students (P = 0.00) believe that MCQS are more reliable than SEQs. \nConclusion: The results of this study showed that students do not consider online tests as reliable and effective as classroom tests because of network issues, and unconducive environment at home, limited time, and academic dishonesty. However,if they are unavoidable, students would be more receptive to MCQs than SEQs. \nKEYWORDS: Reliability, cheating, effectiveness, online assessment \n ","PeriodicalId":338468,"journal":{"name":"Health Professions Educator Journal","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Medical students' perception of online assessment at a private medical college\",\"authors\":\"S. Iftikhar, Khalid Mahmood Cheema\",\"doi\":\"10.53708/hpej.v5i2.1258\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: During COVID-19 lockdown, Shalamar Medical College opted for an unproctored online formative assessment. Medical institutes have conducted online assessments before COVID-19 and literature presents contrasting views on its acceptability by teachers and students alike. \\nObjective: This study aims to determine medical students’ perception of the unproctored online assessments. \\nMethods: A survey questionnaire was disseminated through Google forms to all MBBS students of SMDC on WhatsApp. Consent to take part in the survey was added to the questionnaire and students consenting to be a part of the survey were requested to fill in the questionnaire. The questionnaire consisted of closed ended as well as open-ended questions. The data was analyzed by IBM SPSS 20. \\nResults: Network issues are believed to be a major issue in taking online tests (83%) and 45% of the students feel it is more difficult to take an online test. Fifty-eight percent of the students feel it is easy to cheat on online tests. A considerable number of students (P = 0.00) believe that MCQS are more reliable than SEQs. \\nConclusion: The results of this study showed that students do not consider online tests as reliable and effective as classroom tests because of network issues, and unconducive environment at home, limited time, and academic dishonesty. However,if they are unavoidable, students would be more receptive to MCQs than SEQs. \\nKEYWORDS: Reliability, cheating, effectiveness, online assessment \\n \",\"PeriodicalId\":338468,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Professions Educator Journal\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Professions Educator Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.53708/hpej.v5i2.1258\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Professions Educator Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53708/hpej.v5i2.1258","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:在COVID-19封锁期间,沙拉玛医学院选择了无人监督的在线形成性评估。医学机构在COVID-19之前进行了在线评估,文献对教师和学生的可接受性提出了截然不同的看法。目的:了解医学生对在线无监考评估的认知。方法:在WhatsApp上通过Google表格向SMDC所有MBBS学生发放调查问卷。问卷中加入了同意参加调查的内容,并要求同意参加调查的学生填写问卷。问卷包括封闭式问题和开放式问题。数据采用IBM SPSS 20进行分析。结果:网络问题被认为是参加在线考试的主要问题(83%),45%的学生认为参加在线考试更困难。58%的学生认为网络考试作弊很容易。相当多的学生(P = 0.00)认为MCQS比SEQs更可靠。结论:本研究结果显示,由于网络问题、不利的家庭环境、有限的时间和学术不诚实,学生认为在线测试不如课堂测试可靠和有效。然而,如果它们是不可避免的,学生们会更容易接受mcq而不是seq。关键词:可靠性,作弊,有效性,在线评估
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Medical students' perception of online assessment at a private medical college
Introduction: During COVID-19 lockdown, Shalamar Medical College opted for an unproctored online formative assessment. Medical institutes have conducted online assessments before COVID-19 and literature presents contrasting views on its acceptability by teachers and students alike. Objective: This study aims to determine medical students’ perception of the unproctored online assessments. Methods: A survey questionnaire was disseminated through Google forms to all MBBS students of SMDC on WhatsApp. Consent to take part in the survey was added to the questionnaire and students consenting to be a part of the survey were requested to fill in the questionnaire. The questionnaire consisted of closed ended as well as open-ended questions. The data was analyzed by IBM SPSS 20. Results: Network issues are believed to be a major issue in taking online tests (83%) and 45% of the students feel it is more difficult to take an online test. Fifty-eight percent of the students feel it is easy to cheat on online tests. A considerable number of students (P = 0.00) believe that MCQS are more reliable than SEQs. Conclusion: The results of this study showed that students do not consider online tests as reliable and effective as classroom tests because of network issues, and unconducive environment at home, limited time, and academic dishonesty. However,if they are unavoidable, students would be more receptive to MCQs than SEQs. KEYWORDS: Reliability, cheating, effectiveness, online assessment  
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信