税务咨询中的律师-委托人特权

Jason T. Kujath
{"title":"税务咨询中的律师-委托人特权","authors":"Jason T. Kujath","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2571092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this paper is to set out the essential principles of privilege and to highlight why privilege, as a fundamental concept to the proper administration of justice, does not apply to communications other than those made with a lawyer for a legal purpose. The general discussion of privilege is to provide a basic understanding of privilege to facilitate the discussion surrounding whether it is appropriate to extend it to tax accountants. Lastly, the paper provides general recommendations for tax advisors regarding the protection of documents from disclosure.","PeriodicalId":262460,"journal":{"name":"LSN: Public Tax Law - Non-U.S. (Topic)","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Solicitor-Client Privilege in the Context of Tax Advice\",\"authors\":\"Jason T. Kujath\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.2571092\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of this paper is to set out the essential principles of privilege and to highlight why privilege, as a fundamental concept to the proper administration of justice, does not apply to communications other than those made with a lawyer for a legal purpose. The general discussion of privilege is to provide a basic understanding of privilege to facilitate the discussion surrounding whether it is appropriate to extend it to tax accountants. Lastly, the paper provides general recommendations for tax advisors regarding the protection of documents from disclosure.\",\"PeriodicalId\":262460,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"LSN: Public Tax Law - Non-U.S. (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-02-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"LSN: Public Tax Law - Non-U.S. (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2571092\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSN: Public Tax Law - Non-U.S. (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2571092","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文的目的是阐明特权的基本原则,并强调特权作为适当司法行政的一个基本概念,为什么不适用于为法律目的而与律师进行的通信以外的通信。关于特权的一般性讨论是为了提供对特权的基本理解,以促进围绕将特权扩展到税务会计师是否合适的讨论。最后,本文为税务顾问提供了关于保护文件免于披露的一般建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Solicitor-Client Privilege in the Context of Tax Advice
The purpose of this paper is to set out the essential principles of privilege and to highlight why privilege, as a fundamental concept to the proper administration of justice, does not apply to communications other than those made with a lawyer for a legal purpose. The general discussion of privilege is to provide a basic understanding of privilege to facilitate the discussion surrounding whether it is appropriate to extend it to tax accountants. Lastly, the paper provides general recommendations for tax advisors regarding the protection of documents from disclosure.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信