理解公司治理:通过对影响英国超市应对气候变化策略的因素的考察,将理论与实践联系起来

A. Gouldson, Rory Sullivan
{"title":"理解公司治理:通过对影响英国超市应对气候变化策略的因素的考察,将理论与实践联系起来","authors":"A. Gouldson, Rory Sullivan","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2425860","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper starts from the premise that our understanding of the extent to which, and of the conditions under which, we might rely on new or neoliberal forms of governance beyond the state to deliver particular public interest objectives is limited, especially when they seek to instigate changes in corporate behaviour. In response, we briefly explore some of the key elements of debates on ‘governance from the outside’ where public, private and civic actors engage in activities that seek to shape the behaviour or performance of a corporation, and ‘governance from the inside' where the behaviour of a corporation is shaped by, for example, its structures and systems, resources and opportunities and cultures and values. We hypothesise that the ability of a particular set of governance conditions to change the behaviour or performance of a business will be shaped by the strength and alignment of a) the range of external governance pressures surrounding the business and b) the internal governance conditions within that business. We then consider the reasons why firms within one key sector (UK supermarkets) have responded to one key issue (climate change) in recent years. We argue that a specific set of governance conditions brought about a step change in the UK supermarkets’ approach to climate change in 2007/8, and that this has triggered a period of improvement in their climate-related performance. However, we suggest that this process of improvement is bounded by the presence of a business case that simultaneously supports incremental change and constrains the potential for more transformative change. We conclude by suggesting that if the business case dries up, then governance conditions are likely to be characterised either by collective inaction or by socially-led governance, with its influence being determined by whether the diverse forms of social pressure that are central to it are stronger and better aligned than any associated forms of business resistance. We argue that this has significant implications for our understanding of the extent to which new or neoliberal forms of governance beyond the state can be relied upon to ensure that corporations - or indeed other actors - might help to deliver public interest objectives.","PeriodicalId":107048,"journal":{"name":"Food Industry eJournal","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding the Governance of Corporations: Linking Theory and Practice Through an Examination of the Factors Shaping UK Supermarket Strategies on Climate Change\",\"authors\":\"A. Gouldson, Rory Sullivan\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2425860\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper starts from the premise that our understanding of the extent to which, and of the conditions under which, we might rely on new or neoliberal forms of governance beyond the state to deliver particular public interest objectives is limited, especially when they seek to instigate changes in corporate behaviour. In response, we briefly explore some of the key elements of debates on ‘governance from the outside’ where public, private and civic actors engage in activities that seek to shape the behaviour or performance of a corporation, and ‘governance from the inside' where the behaviour of a corporation is shaped by, for example, its structures and systems, resources and opportunities and cultures and values. We hypothesise that the ability of a particular set of governance conditions to change the behaviour or performance of a business will be shaped by the strength and alignment of a) the range of external governance pressures surrounding the business and b) the internal governance conditions within that business. We then consider the reasons why firms within one key sector (UK supermarkets) have responded to one key issue (climate change) in recent years. We argue that a specific set of governance conditions brought about a step change in the UK supermarkets’ approach to climate change in 2007/8, and that this has triggered a period of improvement in their climate-related performance. However, we suggest that this process of improvement is bounded by the presence of a business case that simultaneously supports incremental change and constrains the potential for more transformative change. We conclude by suggesting that if the business case dries up, then governance conditions are likely to be characterised either by collective inaction or by socially-led governance, with its influence being determined by whether the diverse forms of social pressure that are central to it are stronger and better aligned than any associated forms of business resistance. We argue that this has significant implications for our understanding of the extent to which new or neoliberal forms of governance beyond the state can be relied upon to ensure that corporations - or indeed other actors - might help to deliver public interest objectives.\",\"PeriodicalId\":107048,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Food Industry eJournal\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Food Industry eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2425860\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Industry eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2425860","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文的出发点是这样一个前提,即我们对在何种程度上以及在何种条件下,我们可能依赖新的或新自由主义形式的超越国家的治理来实现特定的公共利益目标的理解是有限的,尤其是当它们试图煽动企业行为的变化时。作为回应,我们简要探讨了“外部治理”辩论的一些关键要素,其中公共,私人和公民行为者参与寻求塑造公司行为或绩效的活动,以及“内部治理”,其中公司的行为受到其结构和系统,资源和机会以及文化和价值观的影响。我们假设,一组特定的治理条件改变业务行为或绩效的能力将由以下因素的强度和一致性决定:a)围绕业务的外部治理压力范围;b)该业务的内部治理条件。然后,我们考虑为什么一个关键部门(英国超市)的公司近年来对一个关键问题(气候变化)做出了回应的原因。我们认为,在2007/8年,一组特定的治理条件使英国超市对气候变化的态度发生了阶段性的变化,这引发了他们在气候相关绩效方面的一段时间的改善。然而,我们建议这个改进过程受到业务用例存在的限制,该业务用例同时支持增量变更并限制更多变革性变更的潜力。我们的结论是,如果商业案例枯竭,那么治理条件可能以集体不作为或社会主导的治理为特征,其影响取决于作为其核心的各种形式的社会压力是否比任何相关形式的商业阻力更强大、更协调。我们认为,这对我们理解在多大程度上可以依靠新的或新自由主义形式的超越国家的治理来确保公司-或实际上其他行为者-可能有助于实现公共利益目标具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Understanding the Governance of Corporations: Linking Theory and Practice Through an Examination of the Factors Shaping UK Supermarket Strategies on Climate Change
This paper starts from the premise that our understanding of the extent to which, and of the conditions under which, we might rely on new or neoliberal forms of governance beyond the state to deliver particular public interest objectives is limited, especially when they seek to instigate changes in corporate behaviour. In response, we briefly explore some of the key elements of debates on ‘governance from the outside’ where public, private and civic actors engage in activities that seek to shape the behaviour or performance of a corporation, and ‘governance from the inside' where the behaviour of a corporation is shaped by, for example, its structures and systems, resources and opportunities and cultures and values. We hypothesise that the ability of a particular set of governance conditions to change the behaviour or performance of a business will be shaped by the strength and alignment of a) the range of external governance pressures surrounding the business and b) the internal governance conditions within that business. We then consider the reasons why firms within one key sector (UK supermarkets) have responded to one key issue (climate change) in recent years. We argue that a specific set of governance conditions brought about a step change in the UK supermarkets’ approach to climate change in 2007/8, and that this has triggered a period of improvement in their climate-related performance. However, we suggest that this process of improvement is bounded by the presence of a business case that simultaneously supports incremental change and constrains the potential for more transformative change. We conclude by suggesting that if the business case dries up, then governance conditions are likely to be characterised either by collective inaction or by socially-led governance, with its influence being determined by whether the diverse forms of social pressure that are central to it are stronger and better aligned than any associated forms of business resistance. We argue that this has significant implications for our understanding of the extent to which new or neoliberal forms of governance beyond the state can be relied upon to ensure that corporations - or indeed other actors - might help to deliver public interest objectives.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信