Aurora Brinkman, Gianna Rea-Sandin, Emily M. Lund, Olivia M. Fitzpatrick, Michaela S. Gusman, Cassandra L. Boness
{"title":"转变关于残疾的论述:转向一个包容的、交叉的焦点。","authors":"Aurora Brinkman, Gianna Rea-Sandin, Emily M. Lund, Olivia M. Fitzpatrick, Michaela S. Gusman, Cassandra L. Boness","doi":"10.31234/osf.io/drmn7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Individuals with disabilities comprise one of the largest marginalized groups in the United States and experience systemic barriers in health care. In Westernized communities, disability has historically been conceptualized via the medical model, which considers disability an individual-level deficit in need of correction. Although other models of disability (e.g., social model) have been developed to address the medical model's ableist shortcomings, these fail to consistently acknowledge intersectionality. Specifically, these models fail to consider that (a) a disabled individual may hold other marginalized or oppressed identities and (b) these intersecting oppressions may exacerbate health inequities. Intersectionality, which originates from Black feminist literature, describes the ways that systems of power and oppression (e.g., racism, sexism) interact to form an individual's unique experience. To date, the intersection of disability and other marginalized identities has been neglected in psychology and related fields, leaving little guidance for how scholars, clinicians, and other stakeholders can address disability via an intersectional lens. The present article discusses how a disability-affirmative, intersectional approach can serve as a strategy for challenging and reforming oppressive systems across the field of psychology. We assert that, ultimately, this approach has the potential to optimize and expand access to equitable, inclusive mental health care, and we propose actionable steps psychologists can take in research, practice, training, and policy in pursuit of this aim. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).","PeriodicalId":409666,"journal":{"name":"The American journal of orthopsychiatry","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Shifting the discourse on disability: Moving to an inclusive, intersectional focus.\",\"authors\":\"Aurora Brinkman, Gianna Rea-Sandin, Emily M. Lund, Olivia M. Fitzpatrick, Michaela S. Gusman, Cassandra L. Boness\",\"doi\":\"10.31234/osf.io/drmn7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Individuals with disabilities comprise one of the largest marginalized groups in the United States and experience systemic barriers in health care. In Westernized communities, disability has historically been conceptualized via the medical model, which considers disability an individual-level deficit in need of correction. Although other models of disability (e.g., social model) have been developed to address the medical model's ableist shortcomings, these fail to consistently acknowledge intersectionality. Specifically, these models fail to consider that (a) a disabled individual may hold other marginalized or oppressed identities and (b) these intersecting oppressions may exacerbate health inequities. Intersectionality, which originates from Black feminist literature, describes the ways that systems of power and oppression (e.g., racism, sexism) interact to form an individual's unique experience. To date, the intersection of disability and other marginalized identities has been neglected in psychology and related fields, leaving little guidance for how scholars, clinicians, and other stakeholders can address disability via an intersectional lens. The present article discusses how a disability-affirmative, intersectional approach can serve as a strategy for challenging and reforming oppressive systems across the field of psychology. We assert that, ultimately, this approach has the potential to optimize and expand access to equitable, inclusive mental health care, and we propose actionable steps psychologists can take in research, practice, training, and policy in pursuit of this aim. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).\",\"PeriodicalId\":409666,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The American journal of orthopsychiatry\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The American journal of orthopsychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/drmn7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American journal of orthopsychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/drmn7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
摘要
残疾人是美国最大的边缘化群体之一,他们在医疗保健方面面临着系统性障碍。在西方化的社会中,残疾历来是通过医学模式概念化的,它认为残疾是一种需要纠正的个人层面的缺陷。虽然其他残疾模型(如社会模型)已被开发来解决医学模型的残疾清单缺陷,但这些模型未能始终承认相互关联。具体而言,这些模式没有考虑到:(a)残疾人可能拥有其他被边缘化或受压迫的身份,以及(b)这些相互交叉的压迫可能加剧卫生不平等。交叉性,起源于黑人女权主义文学,描述权力和压迫系统(如种族主义、性别歧视)相互作用形成个人独特经历的方式。迄今为止,在心理学和相关领域中,残疾和其他边缘身份的交叉点被忽视了,学者、临床医生和其他利益相关者如何通过交叉镜头来解决残疾问题的指导很少。本文讨论了残疾平权,交叉方法如何作为挑战和改革整个心理学领域压迫系统的策略。我们认为,最终,这种方法有可能优化和扩大获得公平、包容的精神卫生保健的机会,我们提出了心理学家可以在研究、实践、培训和政策方面采取的可行步骤,以实现这一目标。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA,版权所有)。
Shifting the discourse on disability: Moving to an inclusive, intersectional focus.
Individuals with disabilities comprise one of the largest marginalized groups in the United States and experience systemic barriers in health care. In Westernized communities, disability has historically been conceptualized via the medical model, which considers disability an individual-level deficit in need of correction. Although other models of disability (e.g., social model) have been developed to address the medical model's ableist shortcomings, these fail to consistently acknowledge intersectionality. Specifically, these models fail to consider that (a) a disabled individual may hold other marginalized or oppressed identities and (b) these intersecting oppressions may exacerbate health inequities. Intersectionality, which originates from Black feminist literature, describes the ways that systems of power and oppression (e.g., racism, sexism) interact to form an individual's unique experience. To date, the intersection of disability and other marginalized identities has been neglected in psychology and related fields, leaving little guidance for how scholars, clinicians, and other stakeholders can address disability via an intersectional lens. The present article discusses how a disability-affirmative, intersectional approach can serve as a strategy for challenging and reforming oppressive systems across the field of psychology. We assert that, ultimately, this approach has the potential to optimize and expand access to equitable, inclusive mental health care, and we propose actionable steps psychologists can take in research, practice, training, and policy in pursuit of this aim. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).