{"title":"关于在自然环境下研究领导力的思考","authors":"S. Livi, D. Kenny","doi":"10.1108/S1475-9144(2009)0000008010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Hall, Lord, and Foster (2009) have commented on whether variance partitioning in the social relations model would be the same in long-term groups and when groups have formal leaders. This reply follows their lead and speculates on how the variance partitioning would change. It considers the design and analysis issues in natural workgroups as well as the estimation of group effects.","PeriodicalId":277029,"journal":{"name":"Research in Multi Level Issues","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Thoughts on studying leadership in natural contexts\",\"authors\":\"S. Livi, D. Kenny\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/S1475-9144(2009)0000008010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Hall, Lord, and Foster (2009) have commented on whether variance partitioning in the social relations model would be the same in long-term groups and when groups have formal leaders. This reply follows their lead and speculates on how the variance partitioning would change. It considers the design and analysis issues in natural workgroups as well as the estimation of group effects.\",\"PeriodicalId\":277029,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research in Multi Level Issues\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-05-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research in Multi Level Issues\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/S1475-9144(2009)0000008010\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Multi Level Issues","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/S1475-9144(2009)0000008010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
摘要
Hall, Lord, and Foster(2009)对社会关系模型中的方差划分在长期群体和有正式领导的群体中是否相同进行了评论。这个回复遵循他们的领导,并推测方差划分将如何变化。它考虑了自然工作组的设计和分析问题以及群体效应的估计。
Thoughts on studying leadership in natural contexts
Hall, Lord, and Foster (2009) have commented on whether variance partitioning in the social relations model would be the same in long-term groups and when groups have formal leaders. This reply follows their lead and speculates on how the variance partitioning would change. It considers the design and analysis issues in natural workgroups as well as the estimation of group effects.