东盟地区高等教育国际化:高等教育是“走向国际化还是被国际化”?

Lourdes Tanhueco-Nepomuceno
{"title":"东盟地区高等教育国际化:高等教育是“走向国际化还是被国际化”?","authors":"Lourdes Tanhueco-Nepomuceno","doi":"10.2991/steach-18.2019.26","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Empirical studies on internationalization of HEIs in the ASEAN countries exist, but are small in scale and are dependent quantitative methods or are limited in perspectives. Therefore, there is a need for a study to examine the role of the selected HEIs in the ASEAN region in managing campus internationalization. The major significance of the study is in its potential contribution to the practice of internationalization and strategic management in higher education. It will shed light on the state of “becoming or being internationalized. The “how is it done?” dimension of university management as it applies to this sphere and, where it appears to be done well, is explored. Some of the strategies evident in the cases were: diversification of teaching delivery modes, exploration of cross-border opportunities, the establishment of strategic alliances, forecasting entrepreneurial research, corporatization, mutual recognition of degrees, intensification of networking abroad, and implementation of onestop service to foreign students. The study proposed a framework to determine whether the HEI is in the state of “Becoming internationalized or Being internationalized.” The framework consists of distinct processes and strategies based on the effective practices culled out from the case studies. While the framework is built around Knight’s (1995) process approach of the internationalization model and Knight’s (2004) remodeled version, several significant additions were made. Using this framework as a touchstone, academic managers could get their bearings when assessing their university’s position and would have a tool for planning future directions and performance. Keywords— Internationalization of Higher Education, ASEAN, global campus, higher education institutions, Becoming internationalized, Being internationalized","PeriodicalId":221746,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the International Conference on Science, Technology, Education, Arts, Culture and Humanity - \"Interdisciplinary Challenges for Humanity Education in Digital Era\" (STEACH 2018)","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Internationalization of Higher Education in the ASEAN Region: Is the HEI in the state of “Becoming internationalized or Being internationalized?\",\"authors\":\"Lourdes Tanhueco-Nepomuceno\",\"doi\":\"10.2991/steach-18.2019.26\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Empirical studies on internationalization of HEIs in the ASEAN countries exist, but are small in scale and are dependent quantitative methods or are limited in perspectives. Therefore, there is a need for a study to examine the role of the selected HEIs in the ASEAN region in managing campus internationalization. The major significance of the study is in its potential contribution to the practice of internationalization and strategic management in higher education. It will shed light on the state of “becoming or being internationalized. The “how is it done?” dimension of university management as it applies to this sphere and, where it appears to be done well, is explored. Some of the strategies evident in the cases were: diversification of teaching delivery modes, exploration of cross-border opportunities, the establishment of strategic alliances, forecasting entrepreneurial research, corporatization, mutual recognition of degrees, intensification of networking abroad, and implementation of onestop service to foreign students. The study proposed a framework to determine whether the HEI is in the state of “Becoming internationalized or Being internationalized.” The framework consists of distinct processes and strategies based on the effective practices culled out from the case studies. While the framework is built around Knight’s (1995) process approach of the internationalization model and Knight’s (2004) remodeled version, several significant additions were made. Using this framework as a touchstone, academic managers could get their bearings when assessing their university’s position and would have a tool for planning future directions and performance. Keywords— Internationalization of Higher Education, ASEAN, global campus, higher education institutions, Becoming internationalized, Being internationalized\",\"PeriodicalId\":221746,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the International Conference on Science, Technology, Education, Arts, Culture and Humanity - \\\"Interdisciplinary Challenges for Humanity Education in Digital Era\\\" (STEACH 2018)\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the International Conference on Science, Technology, Education, Arts, Culture and Humanity - \\\"Interdisciplinary Challenges for Humanity Education in Digital Era\\\" (STEACH 2018)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2991/steach-18.2019.26\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the International Conference on Science, Technology, Education, Arts, Culture and Humanity - \"Interdisciplinary Challenges for Humanity Education in Digital Era\" (STEACH 2018)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2991/steach-18.2019.26","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

东盟国家高校国际化的实证研究虽有,但规模较小,依赖定量方法或视角有限。因此,有必要进行一项研究,以审查选定的东盟地区高等教育机构在管理校园国际化方面的作用。本研究的主要意义在于其对高等教育国际化和战略管理实践的潜在贡献。它将揭示“成为或被国际化”的状态。“这是怎么做的?”的维度,因为它适用于这一领域,并在哪里似乎做得很好,进行了探索。在这些案例中,一些明显的策略是:教学交付模式的多样化、探索跨境机会、建立战略联盟、预测创业研究、公司化、学位互认、加强海外网络以及对外国学生实施一站式服务。本研究提出了一个确定高等教育机构是处于“走向国际化还是被国际化”状态的框架。该框架由基于从案例研究中挑选出的有效实践的不同过程和策略组成。虽然该框架是围绕Knight(1995)的国际化模型的过程方法和Knight(2004)的重塑版本构建的,但也做了一些重要的补充。利用这一框架作为试金石,学术管理者可以在评估大学地位时找到自己的方位,并将有一个工具来规划未来的方向和表现。关键词:高等教育国际化,东盟,全球校园,高等院校,走向国际化,被国际化
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Internationalization of Higher Education in the ASEAN Region: Is the HEI in the state of “Becoming internationalized or Being internationalized?
Empirical studies on internationalization of HEIs in the ASEAN countries exist, but are small in scale and are dependent quantitative methods or are limited in perspectives. Therefore, there is a need for a study to examine the role of the selected HEIs in the ASEAN region in managing campus internationalization. The major significance of the study is in its potential contribution to the practice of internationalization and strategic management in higher education. It will shed light on the state of “becoming or being internationalized. The “how is it done?” dimension of university management as it applies to this sphere and, where it appears to be done well, is explored. Some of the strategies evident in the cases were: diversification of teaching delivery modes, exploration of cross-border opportunities, the establishment of strategic alliances, forecasting entrepreneurial research, corporatization, mutual recognition of degrees, intensification of networking abroad, and implementation of onestop service to foreign students. The study proposed a framework to determine whether the HEI is in the state of “Becoming internationalized or Being internationalized.” The framework consists of distinct processes and strategies based on the effective practices culled out from the case studies. While the framework is built around Knight’s (1995) process approach of the internationalization model and Knight’s (2004) remodeled version, several significant additions were made. Using this framework as a touchstone, academic managers could get their bearings when assessing their university’s position and would have a tool for planning future directions and performance. Keywords— Internationalization of Higher Education, ASEAN, global campus, higher education institutions, Becoming internationalized, Being internationalized
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信