女性主义认识论:知识的解构与重构

Palak Singh
{"title":"女性主义认识论:知识的解构与重构","authors":"Palak Singh","doi":"10.55031/mshare.2020.36.gd.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper endeavours to analyse feminist epistemologies and the main ideas propounded by various philosophers and theorists associated with them, delving into the historicity of how subjugated positions of females have been systematically incorporated into the mainstream bodies of knowledge through the process of ‘othering’ and the positing of such knowledge as being universal and objectively neutral and how this rooted bias has been unearthed and ‘deconstructed’ by various feminist epistemologies which strive to arrive at a ‘reconstructed’ frame of knowledge which aims at providing more accommodative spaces for those relegated to the margins and positions of subjugation, in this case- the females. The paper also analyses the tensions between the traditional and classical notions of knowledge production and the new emergent epistemologies, how the latter fill in the lacunae in the former and their quest to arrive at a conciliatory picture between them both through the lens of various positions in feminist epistemologies.","PeriodicalId":233824,"journal":{"name":"MINDSHARE: International Journal of Research and Development","volume":"312 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Feminist Epistemology: Deconstruction and Reconstruction of Knowledge\",\"authors\":\"Palak Singh\",\"doi\":\"10.55031/mshare.2020.36.gd.6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper endeavours to analyse feminist epistemologies and the main ideas propounded by various philosophers and theorists associated with them, delving into the historicity of how subjugated positions of females have been systematically incorporated into the mainstream bodies of knowledge through the process of ‘othering’ and the positing of such knowledge as being universal and objectively neutral and how this rooted bias has been unearthed and ‘deconstructed’ by various feminist epistemologies which strive to arrive at a ‘reconstructed’ frame of knowledge which aims at providing more accommodative spaces for those relegated to the margins and positions of subjugation, in this case- the females. The paper also analyses the tensions between the traditional and classical notions of knowledge production and the new emergent epistemologies, how the latter fill in the lacunae in the former and their quest to arrive at a conciliatory picture between them both through the lens of various positions in feminist epistemologies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":233824,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"MINDSHARE: International Journal of Research and Development\",\"volume\":\"312 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"MINDSHARE: International Journal of Research and Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.55031/mshare.2020.36.gd.6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MINDSHARE: International Journal of Research and Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55031/mshare.2020.36.gd.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文试图分析女权主义认识论以及与之相关的哲学家和理论家提出的主要观点。深入研究女性被征服的地位是如何通过“他者”的过程被系统地纳入主流知识体系的,并将这种知识假定为普遍和客观中立的,以及这种根深蒂固的偏见是如何被各种女权主义认识论发掘和“解构”的,这些认识论努力达到一个“重建”的知识框架,旨在为那些被降级为女性的人提供更多的容纳空间被征服的边缘和位置,在这里是女性。本文还分析了传统和古典知识生产观念与新兴认识论之间的紧张关系,后者如何填补前者的空白,以及他们如何通过女性主义认识论的不同立场来寻求两者之间的和解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Feminist Epistemology: Deconstruction and Reconstruction of Knowledge
This paper endeavours to analyse feminist epistemologies and the main ideas propounded by various philosophers and theorists associated with them, delving into the historicity of how subjugated positions of females have been systematically incorporated into the mainstream bodies of knowledge through the process of ‘othering’ and the positing of such knowledge as being universal and objectively neutral and how this rooted bias has been unearthed and ‘deconstructed’ by various feminist epistemologies which strive to arrive at a ‘reconstructed’ frame of knowledge which aims at providing more accommodative spaces for those relegated to the margins and positions of subjugation, in this case- the females. The paper also analyses the tensions between the traditional and classical notions of knowledge production and the new emergent epistemologies, how the latter fill in the lacunae in the former and their quest to arrive at a conciliatory picture between them both through the lens of various positions in feminist epistemologies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信