对立违抗性障碍的规则:一个新的治疗概念

Poulton A, Nivendkar M, Rajabalee N, Puusepp-Benazzouz H, Liu A, Bhurawala H
{"title":"对立违抗性障碍的规则:一个新的治疗概念","authors":"Poulton A, Nivendkar M, Rajabalee N, Puusepp-Benazzouz H, Liu A, Bhurawala H","doi":"10.26420/austinjpsychiatrybehavsci.2022.1087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Oppositional Defiant Disorder (ODD) commonly co-exists with ADHD and merits specific interventions. Our aim was to reframe ODD as a set of external rules that the child can reject. We surveyed parents for their views on ‘Rules of ODD’ as a therapeutic concept. Method: Parents of 85 children with ADHD and ODD were invited to rank 7 Rules of ODD in order of relevance and give additional comments. Results: Sixty-six (77%) considered the concept useful; 24 (31%) made additional comments or suggestions. The highest ranked rules were: ‘Always argue or disagree’ and ‘Never admit to being wrong’. No parent suggested the concept was harmful. Conclusions: Rules of ODD was considered useful by most parents. We hope that by redefining ODD as a series of external rules, the stigma of this diagnosis may be lessened, and the child empowered to make their own more rational decisions.","PeriodicalId":200970,"journal":{"name":"Austin Journal of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rules of Oppositional Defiant Disorder: A New Therapeutic Concept\",\"authors\":\"Poulton A, Nivendkar M, Rajabalee N, Puusepp-Benazzouz H, Liu A, Bhurawala H\",\"doi\":\"10.26420/austinjpsychiatrybehavsci.2022.1087\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: Oppositional Defiant Disorder (ODD) commonly co-exists with ADHD and merits specific interventions. Our aim was to reframe ODD as a set of external rules that the child can reject. We surveyed parents for their views on ‘Rules of ODD’ as a therapeutic concept. Method: Parents of 85 children with ADHD and ODD were invited to rank 7 Rules of ODD in order of relevance and give additional comments. Results: Sixty-six (77%) considered the concept useful; 24 (31%) made additional comments or suggestions. The highest ranked rules were: ‘Always argue or disagree’ and ‘Never admit to being wrong’. No parent suggested the concept was harmful. Conclusions: Rules of ODD was considered useful by most parents. We hope that by redefining ODD as a series of external rules, the stigma of this diagnosis may be lessened, and the child empowered to make their own more rational decisions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":200970,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Austin Journal of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Austin Journal of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26420/austinjpsychiatrybehavsci.2022.1087\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Austin Journal of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26420/austinjpsychiatrybehavsci.2022.1087","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:对立违抗性障碍(ODD)通常与ADHD共存,需要特殊的干预措施。我们的目标是将ODD重新定义为一套孩子可以拒绝的外部规则。我们调查了家长对“ODD规则”作为治疗概念的看法。方法:邀请85例ADHD合并ODD患儿家长对7项ODD规则进行相关性排序,并给出附加评价。结果:66人(77%)认为该概念有用;24人(31%)提出了额外的意见或建议。排名最高的规则是:“总是争论或不同意”和“永远不要承认错误”。没有家长认为这个概念有害。结论:大多数家长认为ODD规则是有用的。我们希望通过将ODD重新定义为一系列外部规则,这种诊断的耻辱可能会减少,并且孩子有权做出自己更理性的决定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Rules of Oppositional Defiant Disorder: A New Therapeutic Concept
Objective: Oppositional Defiant Disorder (ODD) commonly co-exists with ADHD and merits specific interventions. Our aim was to reframe ODD as a set of external rules that the child can reject. We surveyed parents for their views on ‘Rules of ODD’ as a therapeutic concept. Method: Parents of 85 children with ADHD and ODD were invited to rank 7 Rules of ODD in order of relevance and give additional comments. Results: Sixty-six (77%) considered the concept useful; 24 (31%) made additional comments or suggestions. The highest ranked rules were: ‘Always argue or disagree’ and ‘Never admit to being wrong’. No parent suggested the concept was harmful. Conclusions: Rules of ODD was considered useful by most parents. We hope that by redefining ODD as a series of external rules, the stigma of this diagnosis may be lessened, and the child empowered to make their own more rational decisions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信