TechDebt 2019主席的致辞

{"title":"TechDebt 2019主席的致辞","authors":"","doi":"10.1109/techdebt.2019.00006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Technical debt is a metaphor that software developers and managers increasingly use to communicate key trade-offs between business constraints and internal quality issues, especially those related to time to market. While other software engineering disciplines—such as software sustainability, maintenance and evolution, refactoring, software quality, and empirical software engineering—have produced results relevant to managing technical debt, none of them alone suffices to model, manage, and communicate the different facets of the complex trade-offs involved in managing technical debt. Similarly, while many software engineering practices can be used to get ahead of technical debt, organizations struggle with managing technical debt routinely and strategically.","PeriodicalId":197657,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Technical Debt (TechDebt)","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Message from the Chairs of TechDebt 2019\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/techdebt.2019.00006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Technical debt is a metaphor that software developers and managers increasingly use to communicate key trade-offs between business constraints and internal quality issues, especially those related to time to market. While other software engineering disciplines—such as software sustainability, maintenance and evolution, refactoring, software quality, and empirical software engineering—have produced results relevant to managing technical debt, none of them alone suffices to model, manage, and communicate the different facets of the complex trade-offs involved in managing technical debt. Similarly, while many software engineering practices can be used to get ahead of technical debt, organizations struggle with managing technical debt routinely and strategically.\",\"PeriodicalId\":197657,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2019 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Technical Debt (TechDebt)\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2019 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Technical Debt (TechDebt)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/techdebt.2019.00006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Technical Debt (TechDebt)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/techdebt.2019.00006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

技术债务是一个比喻,软件开发人员和管理人员越来越多地使用它来沟通业务约束和内部质量问题之间的关键权衡,特别是那些与上市时间相关的问题。虽然其他软件工程学科——例如软件可持续性、维护和进化、重构、软件质量和经验软件工程——已经产生了与管理技术债务相关的结果,但它们中的任何一个都不足以对管理技术债务所涉及的复杂权衡的不同方面进行建模、管理和沟通。类似地,虽然许多软件工程实践可以用于提前处理技术债务,但组织仍在常规地和战略性地管理技术债务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Message from the Chairs of TechDebt 2019
Technical debt is a metaphor that software developers and managers increasingly use to communicate key trade-offs between business constraints and internal quality issues, especially those related to time to market. While other software engineering disciplines—such as software sustainability, maintenance and evolution, refactoring, software quality, and empirical software engineering—have produced results relevant to managing technical debt, none of them alone suffices to model, manage, and communicate the different facets of the complex trade-offs involved in managing technical debt. Similarly, while many software engineering practices can be used to get ahead of technical debt, organizations struggle with managing technical debt routinely and strategically.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信