超越东方主义的伊斯兰教:“宗教”这个范畴在多大程度上描述了伊斯兰教是什么?

Hossam Allam
{"title":"超越东方主义的伊斯兰教:“宗教”这个范畴在多大程度上描述了伊斯兰教是什么?","authors":"Hossam Allam","doi":"10.56529/isr.v1i2.84","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent decades, the validity and the sufficiency of the term ‘religion' as an analytical category have been examined by many religious studies scholars. This essay urges Muslim scholars, sociologists, and scholars of religion to be cautious and to direct critical attention to the practice of categorizing the term ‘religion' in their scholarly discourse and in society at large. Such critical deliberations on the use of ‘religion' as an analytical category must occupy a focal position within any meaningful academic discourse pertaining to religious phenomenon in general and Islam in particular. To be more specific, the critical analysis of the term ‘religion,' and of its delineations with seemingly secular categories, must be further constructively incorporated into any academic discourse on religious phenomena or Islamic tradition. Each distinct conception of the term ‘religion,’ as well as its differentiation from other analytical categories, are outcomes of a particular historical occurrence, within the bounds of specific social institutions and interactions, framed by particular traditions and norms. This essay's critical analysis encompasses not only the category of ‘religion' in various geographical and historical settings, but also the conception of ‘religion' in anthropological and sociological literature.","PeriodicalId":266716,"journal":{"name":"Islamic Studies Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Islam Beyond Orientalism: To what extent does the category 'religion' describe what Islam is?\",\"authors\":\"Hossam Allam\",\"doi\":\"10.56529/isr.v1i2.84\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In recent decades, the validity and the sufficiency of the term ‘religion' as an analytical category have been examined by many religious studies scholars. This essay urges Muslim scholars, sociologists, and scholars of religion to be cautious and to direct critical attention to the practice of categorizing the term ‘religion' in their scholarly discourse and in society at large. Such critical deliberations on the use of ‘religion' as an analytical category must occupy a focal position within any meaningful academic discourse pertaining to religious phenomenon in general and Islam in particular. To be more specific, the critical analysis of the term ‘religion,' and of its delineations with seemingly secular categories, must be further constructively incorporated into any academic discourse on religious phenomena or Islamic tradition. Each distinct conception of the term ‘religion,’ as well as its differentiation from other analytical categories, are outcomes of a particular historical occurrence, within the bounds of specific social institutions and interactions, framed by particular traditions and norms. This essay's critical analysis encompasses not only the category of ‘religion' in various geographical and historical settings, but also the conception of ‘religion' in anthropological and sociological literature.\",\"PeriodicalId\":266716,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Islamic Studies Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Islamic Studies Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.56529/isr.v1i2.84\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Islamic Studies Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56529/isr.v1i2.84","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近几十年来,许多宗教研究学者对“宗教”一词作为分析范畴的有效性和充分性进行了研究。这篇文章敦促穆斯林学者、社会学家和宗教学者保持谨慎,并在他们的学术论述和整个社会中对“宗教”一词进行分类的做法给予批判性的关注。这种对使用“宗教”作为分析范畴的批判性思考,必须在与一般宗教现象,特别是伊斯兰教有关的任何有意义的学术话语中占据焦点位置。更具体地说,对“宗教”一词的批判性分析,以及它与看似世俗的类别的描述,必须进一步建设性地纳入任何关于宗教现象或伊斯兰传统的学术论述中。“宗教”一词的每个不同概念,以及它与其他分析类别的区别,都是特定历史事件的结果,在特定社会制度和互动的范围内,由特定的传统和规范构成。本文的批判性分析不仅包括各种地理和历史背景下的“宗教”范畴,还包括人类学和社会学文献中的“宗教”概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Islam Beyond Orientalism: To what extent does the category 'religion' describe what Islam is?
In recent decades, the validity and the sufficiency of the term ‘religion' as an analytical category have been examined by many religious studies scholars. This essay urges Muslim scholars, sociologists, and scholars of religion to be cautious and to direct critical attention to the practice of categorizing the term ‘religion' in their scholarly discourse and in society at large. Such critical deliberations on the use of ‘religion' as an analytical category must occupy a focal position within any meaningful academic discourse pertaining to religious phenomenon in general and Islam in particular. To be more specific, the critical analysis of the term ‘religion,' and of its delineations with seemingly secular categories, must be further constructively incorporated into any academic discourse on religious phenomena or Islamic tradition. Each distinct conception of the term ‘religion,’ as well as its differentiation from other analytical categories, are outcomes of a particular historical occurrence, within the bounds of specific social institutions and interactions, framed by particular traditions and norms. This essay's critical analysis encompasses not only the category of ‘religion' in various geographical and historical settings, but also the conception of ‘religion' in anthropological and sociological literature.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信