机器学习在信用卡欺诈检测中的应用综述(以案例为例)

Zahra Faraji
{"title":"机器学习在信用卡欺诈检测中的应用综述(以案例为例)","authors":"Zahra Faraji","doi":"10.33215/sjom.v5i1.770","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose - This paper aims to highlight the widely used supervised techniques applied for fraud detection. In addition, this paper aims to apply some techniques to evaluate their performance on real-world data and develop an ensemble model as a potential solution for this problem.\nDesign/Methodology- Different techniques applied in this study for fraud detection purposes are logistic regression, decision tree, random forest, KNN, and XGBoost. The confusion matrix gives information about the assignment of inputs to the different classes. This study uses precision and recall to evaluate the performance, calculated based on the confusion matrix.\nFindings- XGBoost is the fastest and is expected to have the best performance; however, it is only outperforming the random forest in terms of accuracy, precision, recall, and f1-score. In general, the KNN and logistic regression have better performance, which means they better detect fraudulent transactions.\nPractical Implications- The new model can be applied to new data instead of the previous techniques.","PeriodicalId":215982,"journal":{"name":"SEISENSE Journal of Management","volume":"77 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Review of Machine Learning Applications for Credit Card Fraud Detection with A Case study\",\"authors\":\"Zahra Faraji\",\"doi\":\"10.33215/sjom.v5i1.770\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose - This paper aims to highlight the widely used supervised techniques applied for fraud detection. In addition, this paper aims to apply some techniques to evaluate their performance on real-world data and develop an ensemble model as a potential solution for this problem.\\nDesign/Methodology- Different techniques applied in this study for fraud detection purposes are logistic regression, decision tree, random forest, KNN, and XGBoost. The confusion matrix gives information about the assignment of inputs to the different classes. This study uses precision and recall to evaluate the performance, calculated based on the confusion matrix.\\nFindings- XGBoost is the fastest and is expected to have the best performance; however, it is only outperforming the random forest in terms of accuracy, precision, recall, and f1-score. In general, the KNN and logistic regression have better performance, which means they better detect fraudulent transactions.\\nPractical Implications- The new model can be applied to new data instead of the previous techniques.\",\"PeriodicalId\":215982,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SEISENSE Journal of Management\",\"volume\":\"77 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SEISENSE Journal of Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33215/sjom.v5i1.770\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SEISENSE Journal of Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33215/sjom.v5i1.770","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

目的-本文旨在强调广泛使用的监督技术应用于欺诈检测。此外,本文旨在应用一些技术来评估它们在真实数据上的性能,并开发一个集成模型作为该问题的潜在解决方案。设计/方法——本研究中用于欺诈检测目的的不同技术有逻辑回归、决策树、随机森林、KNN和XGBoost。混淆矩阵给出了关于将输入分配给不同类的信息。本研究使用精确度和召回率来评估性能,基于混淆矩阵计算。发现- XGBoost是最快的,预计具有最好的性能;然而,它只在准确性、精密度、召回率和得分方面优于随机森林。一般来说,KNN和逻辑回归具有更好的性能,这意味着它们可以更好地检测欺诈交易。实际意义-新模型可以应用于新数据,而不是以前的技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Review of Machine Learning Applications for Credit Card Fraud Detection with A Case study
Purpose - This paper aims to highlight the widely used supervised techniques applied for fraud detection. In addition, this paper aims to apply some techniques to evaluate their performance on real-world data and develop an ensemble model as a potential solution for this problem. Design/Methodology- Different techniques applied in this study for fraud detection purposes are logistic regression, decision tree, random forest, KNN, and XGBoost. The confusion matrix gives information about the assignment of inputs to the different classes. This study uses precision and recall to evaluate the performance, calculated based on the confusion matrix. Findings- XGBoost is the fastest and is expected to have the best performance; however, it is only outperforming the random forest in terms of accuracy, precision, recall, and f1-score. In general, the KNN and logistic regression have better performance, which means they better detect fraudulent transactions. Practical Implications- The new model can be applied to new data instead of the previous techniques.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信