《吻我凯特》:对女人和性的新看法

N. Adams
{"title":"《吻我凯特》:对女人和性的新看法","authors":"N. Adams","doi":"10.53841/bpslg.2006.7.3.276","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The way that we conceptualise sexual difficulties is always dependent on what we construe as ‘normal’ or ‘acceptable’ sexual functioning. Active female sexuality has historically been seen as more problematic and controversial than male (hetero)sexuality. Traditional models of sexual response have been often been based on male dominated paradigms of penile-vaginal sex and as such provide a limited basis for understanding the range of female sexuality. This article describes some of the limitations of traditional classification systems and some of the recent developments in our understanding of female sexual difficulties, are, I would argue, more helpful than others. However, it also acknowledges that we can never step outside of our own values and beliefs and invites the reader to consider the ways that we as clinicians conceptualise our work and the impact that this has on our clients.","PeriodicalId":311409,"journal":{"name":"Lesbian & Gay Psychology Review","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Kiss Me Kate: A new view of women and sex\",\"authors\":\"N. Adams\",\"doi\":\"10.53841/bpslg.2006.7.3.276\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The way that we conceptualise sexual difficulties is always dependent on what we construe as ‘normal’ or ‘acceptable’ sexual functioning. Active female sexuality has historically been seen as more problematic and controversial than male (hetero)sexuality. Traditional models of sexual response have been often been based on male dominated paradigms of penile-vaginal sex and as such provide a limited basis for understanding the range of female sexuality. This article describes some of the limitations of traditional classification systems and some of the recent developments in our understanding of female sexual difficulties, are, I would argue, more helpful than others. However, it also acknowledges that we can never step outside of our own values and beliefs and invites the reader to consider the ways that we as clinicians conceptualise our work and the impact that this has on our clients.\",\"PeriodicalId\":311409,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lesbian & Gay Psychology Review\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lesbian & Gay Psychology Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.53841/bpslg.2006.7.3.276\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lesbian & Gay Psychology Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53841/bpslg.2006.7.3.276","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

我们概念化性障碍的方式总是依赖于我们对“正常”或“可接受”性功能的理解。历史上,活跃的女性性行为被视为比男性(异性恋)性行为更有问题和争议。传统的性反应模型通常是基于男性主导的阴茎-阴道性行为范式,因此对理解女性性行为的范围提供了有限的基础。这篇文章描述了传统分类系统的一些局限性,以及我们对女性性困难的理解的一些最新进展,我认为这篇文章比其他文章更有帮助。然而,它也承认我们永远不能走出自己的价值观和信仰,并邀请读者考虑我们作为临床医生概念化我们工作的方式以及这对我们客户的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Kiss Me Kate: A new view of women and sex
The way that we conceptualise sexual difficulties is always dependent on what we construe as ‘normal’ or ‘acceptable’ sexual functioning. Active female sexuality has historically been seen as more problematic and controversial than male (hetero)sexuality. Traditional models of sexual response have been often been based on male dominated paradigms of penile-vaginal sex and as such provide a limited basis for understanding the range of female sexuality. This article describes some of the limitations of traditional classification systems and some of the recent developments in our understanding of female sexual difficulties, are, I would argue, more helpful than others. However, it also acknowledges that we can never step outside of our own values and beliefs and invites the reader to consider the ways that we as clinicians conceptualise our work and the impact that this has on our clients.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信