{"title":"并发实现Prolog的可选建议以及它们各自微架构的含义","authors":"C. Ponder, Y. Patt","doi":"10.1145/800016.808229","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Prolog has become a subject of much discussion of late. It has been suggested as the logical language for programming expert systems. A parallel variant is said to be the language of the Japanese 5th Generation Project. In this paper the standard Prolog language is defined and shown to be a restriction of Logic Programming. Several alternative schemes, which have been proposed for improving the performance of Prolog, are examined. Some schemes change the semantics of the language; these effects are discussed. All schemes have implications on the microarchitecture of the implementing engine; these implications are studied.","PeriodicalId":447708,"journal":{"name":"MICRO 17","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1984-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Alternative proposals for implementing Prolog concurrently and implications regarding their respective microarchitectures\",\"authors\":\"C. Ponder, Y. Patt\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/800016.808229\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Prolog has become a subject of much discussion of late. It has been suggested as the logical language for programming expert systems. A parallel variant is said to be the language of the Japanese 5th Generation Project. In this paper the standard Prolog language is defined and shown to be a restriction of Logic Programming. Several alternative schemes, which have been proposed for improving the performance of Prolog, are examined. Some schemes change the semantics of the language; these effects are discussed. All schemes have implications on the microarchitecture of the implementing engine; these implications are studied.\",\"PeriodicalId\":447708,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"MICRO 17\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1984-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"MICRO 17\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/800016.808229\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MICRO 17","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/800016.808229","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Alternative proposals for implementing Prolog concurrently and implications regarding their respective microarchitectures
Prolog has become a subject of much discussion of late. It has been suggested as the logical language for programming expert systems. A parallel variant is said to be the language of the Japanese 5th Generation Project. In this paper the standard Prolog language is defined and shown to be a restriction of Logic Programming. Several alternative schemes, which have been proposed for improving the performance of Prolog, are examined. Some schemes change the semantics of the language; these effects are discussed. All schemes have implications on the microarchitecture of the implementing engine; these implications are studied.