新生儿败血症中血流分离物的病原体和抗生素谱:来自孟加拉国一家三级保健医院的发现

S. Akter, Israt Jahan Chaudhury, Mosammad Alpana Jahan, Subhash Sah, Abdul Mannan
{"title":"新生儿败血症中血流分离物的病原体和抗生素谱:来自孟加拉国一家三级保健医院的发现","authors":"S. Akter, Israt Jahan Chaudhury, Mosammad Alpana Jahan, Subhash Sah, Abdul Mannan","doi":"10.15342/ijms.2022.628","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Neonatal sepsis is associated with increased mortality and morbidity including neurodevelopmental impairment and prolonged hospital stay. The organism responsible for neonatal sepsis may vary across geographical boundaries even from institution to institution and with the time of illness thus periodic surveillance is a necessity. The present study was therefore carried out to determine the common pathogens and their antibiotic sensitivity pattern. Objectives: To isolate the bacterial agents causing neonatal sepsis determine the sensitivity pattern of the causative bacterial agents. Methods: This cross-sectional study was carried out in the neonatal intensive care unit of BSMMU from December 2012 to July 2013. Neonates (0-28 days) who were admitted in neonatal intensive care unit with suspected sepsis were included in this study. After admission written informed consent from parents were obtained and emergency management was given to the baby and then septic screening along with blood culture and antimicrobial sensitivity were done. All data were compiled, tabulated and then analyzed by SPSS V.12 according to the objectives of the study. Results: A total 94 newborn babies with suspected sepsis were included in this study. Most of the babies (54.3%) were admitted within 24 hours after birth, 86.17% babies were preterm and 81.92% babies birth weight was <2500 gm. There was preponderance of male babies over females comprising 53% male and 47% female. Among the suspected septic newborns 27.66% of babies had culture-positive sepsis and 73.41% of babies had culture-negative sepsis. Among the culture-positive cases, 72% of babies were developed late-onset sepsis and 28% of babies were developed early onset sepsis. The isolates from blood culture were Klebsiella pneumoniae in 9 (34%) cases, 6 (23%) cases were E. coli, Acinetobacter, Staphylococcus was found in 2 (8%) cases and Pseudomonas, Enterobacter, and Citrobacter were found in 1 (4%) case. Gram negative organisms predominated on Gram positive bacteria. Imipenem, Ciprofloxacin, Colistin, and Netilmicin were the most sensitive antibiotics to the commonly isolated organisms. Almost all organisms were resistant to Ampicillin and Gentamicin. Conclusion: Klebsiella pneumoniae is the commonest organism responsible for neonatal sepsis in BSMMU. There is an overall decline in antibiotic susceptibility to commonly isolated bacterial pathogens.","PeriodicalId":143308,"journal":{"name":"Integrative Journal of Medical Sciences","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pathogens and Antibiogram of Blood Stream Isolates in Neonatal Sepsis: Findings from a Tertiary Care Hospital, Bangladesh\",\"authors\":\"S. Akter, Israt Jahan Chaudhury, Mosammad Alpana Jahan, Subhash Sah, Abdul Mannan\",\"doi\":\"10.15342/ijms.2022.628\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Neonatal sepsis is associated with increased mortality and morbidity including neurodevelopmental impairment and prolonged hospital stay. The organism responsible for neonatal sepsis may vary across geographical boundaries even from institution to institution and with the time of illness thus periodic surveillance is a necessity. The present study was therefore carried out to determine the common pathogens and their antibiotic sensitivity pattern. Objectives: To isolate the bacterial agents causing neonatal sepsis determine the sensitivity pattern of the causative bacterial agents. Methods: This cross-sectional study was carried out in the neonatal intensive care unit of BSMMU from December 2012 to July 2013. Neonates (0-28 days) who were admitted in neonatal intensive care unit with suspected sepsis were included in this study. After admission written informed consent from parents were obtained and emergency management was given to the baby and then septic screening along with blood culture and antimicrobial sensitivity were done. All data were compiled, tabulated and then analyzed by SPSS V.12 according to the objectives of the study. Results: A total 94 newborn babies with suspected sepsis were included in this study. Most of the babies (54.3%) were admitted within 24 hours after birth, 86.17% babies were preterm and 81.92% babies birth weight was <2500 gm. There was preponderance of male babies over females comprising 53% male and 47% female. Among the suspected septic newborns 27.66% of babies had culture-positive sepsis and 73.41% of babies had culture-negative sepsis. Among the culture-positive cases, 72% of babies were developed late-onset sepsis and 28% of babies were developed early onset sepsis. The isolates from blood culture were Klebsiella pneumoniae in 9 (34%) cases, 6 (23%) cases were E. coli, Acinetobacter, Staphylococcus was found in 2 (8%) cases and Pseudomonas, Enterobacter, and Citrobacter were found in 1 (4%) case. Gram negative organisms predominated on Gram positive bacteria. Imipenem, Ciprofloxacin, Colistin, and Netilmicin were the most sensitive antibiotics to the commonly isolated organisms. Almost all organisms were resistant to Ampicillin and Gentamicin. Conclusion: Klebsiella pneumoniae is the commonest organism responsible for neonatal sepsis in BSMMU. There is an overall decline in antibiotic susceptibility to commonly isolated bacterial pathogens.\",\"PeriodicalId\":143308,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Integrative Journal of Medical Sciences\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Integrative Journal of Medical Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15342/ijms.2022.628\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Integrative Journal of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15342/ijms.2022.628","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:新生儿脓毒症与包括神经发育障碍和住院时间延长在内的死亡率和发病率增加有关。导致新生儿败血症的微生物可能跨越地理边界,甚至从一个机构到另一个机构,随着疾病的时间而变化,因此定期监测是必要的。因此,本研究旨在确定常见病原体及其抗生素敏感性模式。目的:分离引起新生儿脓毒症的病原菌,确定病原菌的敏感性。方法:本横断面研究于2012年12月至2013年7月在BSMMU新生儿重症监护病房进行。本研究纳入了新生儿重症监护病房疑似脓毒症的新生儿(0-28天)。入院后获得父母的书面知情同意,对婴儿进行紧急处理,然后进行脓毒症筛查、血液培养和抗菌药物敏感性检查。根据研究目的,对所有数据进行整理、制表,并使用SPSS V.12软件进行分析。结果:本研究共纳入94例疑似脓毒症新生儿。出生后24小时内入院的占54.3%,早产占86.17%,出生体重<2500克占81.92%,男婴多于女婴,男婴占53%,女婴占47%。在疑似脓毒症患儿中,培养阳性患儿占27.66%,培养阴性患儿占73.41%。在培养阳性的病例中,72%的婴儿发展为晚发型败血症,28%的婴儿发展为早发型败血症。血培养检出肺炎克雷伯菌9例(34%),大肠杆菌、不动杆菌、葡萄球菌2例(8%),假单胞菌、肠杆菌、柠檬酸杆菌1例(4%)。革兰氏阴性菌以革兰氏阳性菌为主。亚胺培南、环丙沙星、粘菌素和奈替米星对常见分离菌最敏感。几乎所有的生物都对氨苄西林和庆大霉素耐药。结论:肺炎克雷伯菌是BSMMU新生儿败血症最常见的病原菌。对通常分离的细菌病原体的抗生素敏感性总体下降。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pathogens and Antibiogram of Blood Stream Isolates in Neonatal Sepsis: Findings from a Tertiary Care Hospital, Bangladesh
Background: Neonatal sepsis is associated with increased mortality and morbidity including neurodevelopmental impairment and prolonged hospital stay. The organism responsible for neonatal sepsis may vary across geographical boundaries even from institution to institution and with the time of illness thus periodic surveillance is a necessity. The present study was therefore carried out to determine the common pathogens and their antibiotic sensitivity pattern. Objectives: To isolate the bacterial agents causing neonatal sepsis determine the sensitivity pattern of the causative bacterial agents. Methods: This cross-sectional study was carried out in the neonatal intensive care unit of BSMMU from December 2012 to July 2013. Neonates (0-28 days) who were admitted in neonatal intensive care unit with suspected sepsis were included in this study. After admission written informed consent from parents were obtained and emergency management was given to the baby and then septic screening along with blood culture and antimicrobial sensitivity were done. All data were compiled, tabulated and then analyzed by SPSS V.12 according to the objectives of the study. Results: A total 94 newborn babies with suspected sepsis were included in this study. Most of the babies (54.3%) were admitted within 24 hours after birth, 86.17% babies were preterm and 81.92% babies birth weight was <2500 gm. There was preponderance of male babies over females comprising 53% male and 47% female. Among the suspected septic newborns 27.66% of babies had culture-positive sepsis and 73.41% of babies had culture-negative sepsis. Among the culture-positive cases, 72% of babies were developed late-onset sepsis and 28% of babies were developed early onset sepsis. The isolates from blood culture were Klebsiella pneumoniae in 9 (34%) cases, 6 (23%) cases were E. coli, Acinetobacter, Staphylococcus was found in 2 (8%) cases and Pseudomonas, Enterobacter, and Citrobacter were found in 1 (4%) case. Gram negative organisms predominated on Gram positive bacteria. Imipenem, Ciprofloxacin, Colistin, and Netilmicin were the most sensitive antibiotics to the commonly isolated organisms. Almost all organisms were resistant to Ampicillin and Gentamicin. Conclusion: Klebsiella pneumoniae is the commonest organism responsible for neonatal sepsis in BSMMU. There is an overall decline in antibiotic susceptibility to commonly isolated bacterial pathogens.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信