LM PCI的结果:前50例无现场IVUS设备的单中心经验

MG Azam, Md. Shafiqul Islam, S. Mondal, Nobiul Islam, Mizanur Rahman, Abdullah Al Matin, N. Ahmed, M. Arefin
{"title":"LM PCI的结果:前50例无现场IVUS设备的单中心经验","authors":"MG Azam, Md. Shafiqul Islam, S. Mondal, Nobiul Islam, Mizanur Rahman, Abdullah Al Matin, N. Ahmed, M. Arefin","doi":"10.3329/bhj.v37i1.60098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Left main disease (LMD) is related to significant morbidity and mortality. This study was done to evaluate the clinical major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE), including unstable angina, myocardial infarction, heart failure, target vessel revascularization, stroke and death in patients undergoing left main stem stenting without availability of in-site intravascular imaging (IVUS). Methods & Materials: It was a prospective observational study done in National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases & Hospital (NICVD) from March 2014 to June 2019. Our study included 50 patients who underwent Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for left main disease without use of IVUS. All the patients were followed up for 1 year & 2 years, one patient was lost to follow-up. Outcomes included in MACE were death, myocardial infarction, unstable angina, heart failure, stroke and target vessel revascularization (TVR). Results: Fifty patients (mean age 58.4 ± 4.1 years, 44 male, 06 female) were treated with a mean SYNTAX score of 24.8 ± 2.6. Thirty two (64%) patients had stable angina, 17 (34%) had unstable angina/non ST-elevation myocardial infarction, and 1 (02%) had ST-elevation Myocardial infarction. Among the risk factors, 21(42%) had DM, 33 (66%) were hypertensive, 22 (44%) were smoker, 19 (38%) had dyslipidemia, 09 (18%) had previous h/o MI, 11 (22%) had family h/o CAD & 01 (02%) had previous h/o CVD. Preprocedural LVEF was 49.92± 6.60 % and post procedural 54.84 ± 4.55% which showed significant improvement of LVEF after PCI (p=0.003). Most of the patients presented with LM with SVD (82%). Among all patients, 39 (78%) underwent complete revascularization in compare to 11 (22%) had incomplete revascularization. Thirty eight (76%) patients received a single-stent DES and 12 (24%) received two-stents DES. Among double stent strategy, majority underwent TAP (50%). All access was femoral & No reflow phenomena were found in any of the patients during the procedure. No perioperative mortalities were noted and no urgent coronary bypass graft surgery was required. One patient was lost to follow-up. After 1-year follow-up period, 1 (02%) patients had non-fatal myocardial infarction, 7 (14%) had episodes of unstable angina (UA) and 3 (06%) had heart failure (HF). After 2-years there was no new MI but 09 (18%) had UA & 4 (08%) patients had HF episode in total. TLR was 2 (04%) in first year and 3 (06%) in 2nd year. Total mortality was 1(02%) in first year & 3(06%) in 2nd year. The multivariable analysis showed a good prognosis in patients receiving LM PCI with a total event rate of 28% & mortality 6%. A multivariate regression analysis with risk factors for coronary artery disease as predictive variables showed that high SYNTAX score (p = 0.013), incomplete revascularization (p=0.002) & low post procedural LVEF (p= 0.001) was an independent predictor of MACE. Conclusion: Percutaneous coronary intervention of left main coronary disease without use of IVUS showed good prognosis after 1-year & 2-years follow-up. It would not only save a procedure time for physicians but also prevent a financial burden on patients if they cannot afford intravascular imaging.\nBangladesh Heart Journal 2022; 37(1): 1-9","PeriodicalId":247590,"journal":{"name":"Bangladesh Heart Journal","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Outcome of LM PCI: A Single Center Experience of First 50 Cases without In-site IVUS Facility\",\"authors\":\"MG Azam, Md. Shafiqul Islam, S. Mondal, Nobiul Islam, Mizanur Rahman, Abdullah Al Matin, N. Ahmed, M. Arefin\",\"doi\":\"10.3329/bhj.v37i1.60098\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Left main disease (LMD) is related to significant morbidity and mortality. This study was done to evaluate the clinical major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE), including unstable angina, myocardial infarction, heart failure, target vessel revascularization, stroke and death in patients undergoing left main stem stenting without availability of in-site intravascular imaging (IVUS). Methods & Materials: It was a prospective observational study done in National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases & Hospital (NICVD) from March 2014 to June 2019. Our study included 50 patients who underwent Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for left main disease without use of IVUS. All the patients were followed up for 1 year & 2 years, one patient was lost to follow-up. Outcomes included in MACE were death, myocardial infarction, unstable angina, heart failure, stroke and target vessel revascularization (TVR). Results: Fifty patients (mean age 58.4 ± 4.1 years, 44 male, 06 female) were treated with a mean SYNTAX score of 24.8 ± 2.6. Thirty two (64%) patients had stable angina, 17 (34%) had unstable angina/non ST-elevation myocardial infarction, and 1 (02%) had ST-elevation Myocardial infarction. Among the risk factors, 21(42%) had DM, 33 (66%) were hypertensive, 22 (44%) were smoker, 19 (38%) had dyslipidemia, 09 (18%) had previous h/o MI, 11 (22%) had family h/o CAD & 01 (02%) had previous h/o CVD. Preprocedural LVEF was 49.92± 6.60 % and post procedural 54.84 ± 4.55% which showed significant improvement of LVEF after PCI (p=0.003). Most of the patients presented with LM with SVD (82%). Among all patients, 39 (78%) underwent complete revascularization in compare to 11 (22%) had incomplete revascularization. Thirty eight (76%) patients received a single-stent DES and 12 (24%) received two-stents DES. Among double stent strategy, majority underwent TAP (50%). All access was femoral & No reflow phenomena were found in any of the patients during the procedure. No perioperative mortalities were noted and no urgent coronary bypass graft surgery was required. One patient was lost to follow-up. After 1-year follow-up period, 1 (02%) patients had non-fatal myocardial infarction, 7 (14%) had episodes of unstable angina (UA) and 3 (06%) had heart failure (HF). After 2-years there was no new MI but 09 (18%) had UA & 4 (08%) patients had HF episode in total. TLR was 2 (04%) in first year and 3 (06%) in 2nd year. Total mortality was 1(02%) in first year & 3(06%) in 2nd year. The multivariable analysis showed a good prognosis in patients receiving LM PCI with a total event rate of 28% & mortality 6%. A multivariate regression analysis with risk factors for coronary artery disease as predictive variables showed that high SYNTAX score (p = 0.013), incomplete revascularization (p=0.002) & low post procedural LVEF (p= 0.001) was an independent predictor of MACE. Conclusion: Percutaneous coronary intervention of left main coronary disease without use of IVUS showed good prognosis after 1-year & 2-years follow-up. It would not only save a procedure time for physicians but also prevent a financial burden on patients if they cannot afford intravascular imaging.\\nBangladesh Heart Journal 2022; 37(1): 1-9\",\"PeriodicalId\":247590,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bangladesh Heart Journal\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bangladesh Heart Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3329/bhj.v37i1.60098\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bangladesh Heart Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3329/bhj.v37i1.60098","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

左主干疾病(LMD)是一种高发病率、高死亡率的疾病。本研究旨在评估没有血管内显像(IVUS)的左主干支架置入术患者的临床主要不良心血管事件(MACE),包括不稳定型心绞痛、心肌梗死、心力衰竭、靶血管重建术、卒中和死亡。方法与材料:2014年3月至2019年6月在美国国立心血管疾病与医院研究所(NICVD)进行的前瞻性观察性研究。我们的研究纳入了50例经皮冠状动脉介入治疗左主干疾病而不使用IVUS的患者。所有患者随访1年、2年,1例失访。MACE包括死亡、心肌梗死、不稳定型心绞痛、心力衰竭、卒中和靶血管重建术(TVR)。结果:50例患者(平均年龄58.4±4.1岁,男性44例,女性06例),SYNTAX平均评分24.8±2.6。稳定型心绞痛32例(64%),不稳定型心绞痛/非st段抬高型心肌梗死17例(34%),st段抬高型心肌梗死1例(02%)。其中糖尿病21例(42%),高血压33例(66%),吸烟者22例(44%),血脂异常19例(38%),既往h/o心肌梗死09例(18%),家族h/o冠心病11例(22%),既往h/o心血管疾病01例(02%)。术前LVEF为49.92±6.60%,术后LVEF为54.84±4.55%,PCI术后LVEF明显改善(p=0.003)。大多数患者表现为LM合并SVD(82%)。在所有患者中,39例(78%)接受了完全血运重建术,11例(22%)接受了不完全血运重建术。38例(76%)患者接受了单支架DES, 12例(24%)患者接受了双支架DES。在双支架策略中,大多数患者接受了TAP(50%)。所有患者均为股骨通道,手术过程中未发现血流现象。无围手术期死亡,无紧急冠状动脉搭桥手术。1例患者失访。随访1年后,1例(02%)患者发生非致死性心肌梗死,7例(14%)患者发生不稳定型心绞痛(UA), 3例(06%)患者发生心力衰竭(HF)。2年后,没有新的心肌梗死,但共有09例(18%)患者发生UA, 4例(08%)患者发生心衰。第一年TLR为2(04%),第二年TLR为3(06%)。第一年总死亡率为1例(02%),第二年为3例(06%)。多变量分析显示,接受LM PCI的患者预后良好,总事件发生率为28%,死亡率为6%。以冠状动脉疾病危险因素为预测变量的多因素回归分析显示,SYNTAX评分高(p= 0.013)、血运重建不完全(p=0.002)和术后低LVEF (p= 0.001)是MACE的独立预测因子。结论:经皮冠状动脉介入治疗左主干病变,不使用IVUS,随访1年、2年,预后良好。这不仅可以为医生节省手术时间,还可以避免病人在无法负担血管内成像费用时的经济负担。孟加拉国心脏杂志2022;37 (1): 1 - 9
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Outcome of LM PCI: A Single Center Experience of First 50 Cases without In-site IVUS Facility
Introduction: Left main disease (LMD) is related to significant morbidity and mortality. This study was done to evaluate the clinical major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE), including unstable angina, myocardial infarction, heart failure, target vessel revascularization, stroke and death in patients undergoing left main stem stenting without availability of in-site intravascular imaging (IVUS). Methods & Materials: It was a prospective observational study done in National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases & Hospital (NICVD) from March 2014 to June 2019. Our study included 50 patients who underwent Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for left main disease without use of IVUS. All the patients were followed up for 1 year & 2 years, one patient was lost to follow-up. Outcomes included in MACE were death, myocardial infarction, unstable angina, heart failure, stroke and target vessel revascularization (TVR). Results: Fifty patients (mean age 58.4 ± 4.1 years, 44 male, 06 female) were treated with a mean SYNTAX score of 24.8 ± 2.6. Thirty two (64%) patients had stable angina, 17 (34%) had unstable angina/non ST-elevation myocardial infarction, and 1 (02%) had ST-elevation Myocardial infarction. Among the risk factors, 21(42%) had DM, 33 (66%) were hypertensive, 22 (44%) were smoker, 19 (38%) had dyslipidemia, 09 (18%) had previous h/o MI, 11 (22%) had family h/o CAD & 01 (02%) had previous h/o CVD. Preprocedural LVEF was 49.92± 6.60 % and post procedural 54.84 ± 4.55% which showed significant improvement of LVEF after PCI (p=0.003). Most of the patients presented with LM with SVD (82%). Among all patients, 39 (78%) underwent complete revascularization in compare to 11 (22%) had incomplete revascularization. Thirty eight (76%) patients received a single-stent DES and 12 (24%) received two-stents DES. Among double stent strategy, majority underwent TAP (50%). All access was femoral & No reflow phenomena were found in any of the patients during the procedure. No perioperative mortalities were noted and no urgent coronary bypass graft surgery was required. One patient was lost to follow-up. After 1-year follow-up period, 1 (02%) patients had non-fatal myocardial infarction, 7 (14%) had episodes of unstable angina (UA) and 3 (06%) had heart failure (HF). After 2-years there was no new MI but 09 (18%) had UA & 4 (08%) patients had HF episode in total. TLR was 2 (04%) in first year and 3 (06%) in 2nd year. Total mortality was 1(02%) in first year & 3(06%) in 2nd year. The multivariable analysis showed a good prognosis in patients receiving LM PCI with a total event rate of 28% & mortality 6%. A multivariate regression analysis with risk factors for coronary artery disease as predictive variables showed that high SYNTAX score (p = 0.013), incomplete revascularization (p=0.002) & low post procedural LVEF (p= 0.001) was an independent predictor of MACE. Conclusion: Percutaneous coronary intervention of left main coronary disease without use of IVUS showed good prognosis after 1-year & 2-years follow-up. It would not only save a procedure time for physicians but also prevent a financial burden on patients if they cannot afford intravascular imaging. Bangladesh Heart Journal 2022; 37(1): 1-9
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信