工业设计中不可测试的多周期路径延迟故障

M. Syal, M. Hsiao, S. Natarajan, S. Chakravarty
{"title":"工业设计中不可测试的多周期路径延迟故障","authors":"M. Syal, M. Hsiao, S. Natarajan, S. Chakravarty","doi":"10.1109/ATS.2005.111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The need for high-performance pipelined architectures has resulted in the adoption of latch based designs with multiple, interacting clocks. For such designs, time sharing across latches results in signals which propagate across multiple clock cycles along paths with multiple latches. These paths need to be tested for delay failures to ensure reliability of performance. However, many of these multi-cycle paths can be untestable and significant computational effort is wasted in targeting such paths during test generation and fault grading. To save this computational effort, a-priori identification of untestable multicycle paths is desired. We address this issue in our paper through a novel and unique framework: unlike traditional techniques, which focus only on single-cycle path delay faults (for flip-flop based designs with single clock), our framework efficiently identifies untestable multi-cycle path delay faults (Mpdfs) in latch-based designs with multiple clocks. We use a novel graphical representation and sequential implications to identify non-robustly untestable M-pdfs through a three-step methodology. Results for industrial designs demonstrate the effectiveness and scalability of our framework.","PeriodicalId":373563,"journal":{"name":"14th Asian Test Symposium (ATS'05)","volume":"70 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Untestable Multi-Cycle Path Delay Faults in Industrial Designs\",\"authors\":\"M. Syal, M. Hsiao, S. Natarajan, S. Chakravarty\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ATS.2005.111\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The need for high-performance pipelined architectures has resulted in the adoption of latch based designs with multiple, interacting clocks. For such designs, time sharing across latches results in signals which propagate across multiple clock cycles along paths with multiple latches. These paths need to be tested for delay failures to ensure reliability of performance. However, many of these multi-cycle paths can be untestable and significant computational effort is wasted in targeting such paths during test generation and fault grading. To save this computational effort, a-priori identification of untestable multicycle paths is desired. We address this issue in our paper through a novel and unique framework: unlike traditional techniques, which focus only on single-cycle path delay faults (for flip-flop based designs with single clock), our framework efficiently identifies untestable multi-cycle path delay faults (Mpdfs) in latch-based designs with multiple clocks. We use a novel graphical representation and sequential implications to identify non-robustly untestable M-pdfs through a three-step methodology. Results for industrial designs demonstrate the effectiveness and scalability of our framework.\",\"PeriodicalId\":373563,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"14th Asian Test Symposium (ATS'05)\",\"volume\":\"70 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-12-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"14th Asian Test Symposium (ATS'05)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ATS.2005.111\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"14th Asian Test Symposium (ATS'05)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ATS.2005.111","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

对高性能流水线架构的需求导致采用基于锁存器的设计,具有多个相互作用的时钟。对于这样的设计,锁存器之间的时间共享导致信号沿着具有多个锁存器的路径跨多个时钟周期传播。需要对这些路径进行延迟故障测试,以确保性能的可靠性。然而,这些多周期路径中的许多可能是不可测试的,并且在测试生成和故障分级期间,针对这些路径浪费了大量的计算精力。为了节省计算工作量,需要先验地识别不可测试的多循环路径。我们在论文中通过一个新颖而独特的框架解决了这个问题:与传统技术不同,传统技术只关注单周期路径延迟故障(对于基于单时钟的触发器设计),我们的框架有效地识别了基于锁存器的多时钟设计中不可测试的多周期路径延迟故障(Mpdfs)。我们使用一种新颖的图形表示和顺序含义,通过三步方法识别非鲁棒不可测试的m -pdf。工业设计的结果证明了我们的框架的有效性和可扩展性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Untestable Multi-Cycle Path Delay Faults in Industrial Designs
The need for high-performance pipelined architectures has resulted in the adoption of latch based designs with multiple, interacting clocks. For such designs, time sharing across latches results in signals which propagate across multiple clock cycles along paths with multiple latches. These paths need to be tested for delay failures to ensure reliability of performance. However, many of these multi-cycle paths can be untestable and significant computational effort is wasted in targeting such paths during test generation and fault grading. To save this computational effort, a-priori identification of untestable multicycle paths is desired. We address this issue in our paper through a novel and unique framework: unlike traditional techniques, which focus only on single-cycle path delay faults (for flip-flop based designs with single clock), our framework efficiently identifies untestable multi-cycle path delay faults (Mpdfs) in latch-based designs with multiple clocks. We use a novel graphical representation and sequential implications to identify non-robustly untestable M-pdfs through a three-step methodology. Results for industrial designs demonstrate the effectiveness and scalability of our framework.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信