{"title":"抑郁症管理中的正念和积极心理学干预:一项对照比较试验研究","authors":"F. Albignac , S. Lantheaume , R. Shankland","doi":"10.1016/j.psfr.2022.07.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aims</h3><p>The aim of this pilot comparative study was to compare the efficacy and the processes of two third wave psychotherapy interventions (a Mindfulness Based Intervention and a Positive Psychology Intervention) in the reduction of moderate to severe depression.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Twenty-seven patients (mean age<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->44 years old) suffering from moderate to severe depression were recruited in a psychiatric clinic in the South-Est of France. They were randomized to either a Mindfulness Based Intervention (MBI; <em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->10) or a Positive Psychology Intervention (PPI; <em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->12) and compared to a Treatment As Usual (TAU; <em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->5) group who benefited from psychoeducational and classical cognitive behavioral emotion regulation workshops. The interventions were based on existing validated mindfulness and positive psychology interventions (MBCT and CARE). Participants completed questionnaires before (T1), after (T2) and one month after the intervention (T3). These questionnaires measured depressive symptoms, hopelessness, well-being, authentic-sustainable happiness, psychological flexibility, procrastination, and attention orientation towards the positive aspects of life. These data were completed by qualitative data collected through semi-directed interviews at T2 in order to assess to what extent each participant had found the intervention useful and adapted to their needs. These interviews also assessed how much participants expressed motivation to continue the practices learnt.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Participants showed reduced depressive symptoms and hopelessness, enhanced well-being, authentic-sustainable happiness, psychological flexibility, and attention orientation towards positive aspects of life at T2 in both interventions, which were maintained at T3. Procrastination significantly decreased at T2 only for the PPI group. The TAU control group only showed a significant increase in well-being at T2. The results from the semi-directed interviews underlined that the patients perceived the interventions as useful in terms of increased openness and self-kindness (MBI) as well as altruistic attitudes (PPI).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Although the interventions are distinct, the effects appear to be similar in terms of efficacy and mechanisms of action, apart from a greater behavioral activation in the PPI intervention. The mindfulness based intervention group intervention and the positive psychology group intervention carried out in this study appeared to be adapted to the patients and mostly positive psychology practices were reported to be easily used outside the sessions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interventions de pleine conscience et de psychologie positive dans la prise en charge de la dépression : une étude pilote comparative contrôlée\",\"authors\":\"F. Albignac , S. Lantheaume , R. Shankland\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.psfr.2022.07.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Aims</h3><p>The aim of this pilot comparative study was to compare the efficacy and the processes of two third wave psychotherapy interventions (a Mindfulness Based Intervention and a Positive Psychology Intervention) in the reduction of moderate to severe depression.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Twenty-seven patients (mean age<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->44 years old) suffering from moderate to severe depression were recruited in a psychiatric clinic in the South-Est of France. They were randomized to either a Mindfulness Based Intervention (MBI; <em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->10) or a Positive Psychology Intervention (PPI; <em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->12) and compared to a Treatment As Usual (TAU; <em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->5) group who benefited from psychoeducational and classical cognitive behavioral emotion regulation workshops. The interventions were based on existing validated mindfulness and positive psychology interventions (MBCT and CARE). Participants completed questionnaires before (T1), after (T2) and one month after the intervention (T3). These questionnaires measured depressive symptoms, hopelessness, well-being, authentic-sustainable happiness, psychological flexibility, procrastination, and attention orientation towards the positive aspects of life. These data were completed by qualitative data collected through semi-directed interviews at T2 in order to assess to what extent each participant had found the intervention useful and adapted to their needs. These interviews also assessed how much participants expressed motivation to continue the practices learnt.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Participants showed reduced depressive symptoms and hopelessness, enhanced well-being, authentic-sustainable happiness, psychological flexibility, and attention orientation towards positive aspects of life at T2 in both interventions, which were maintained at T3. Procrastination significantly decreased at T2 only for the PPI group. The TAU control group only showed a significant increase in well-being at T2. The results from the semi-directed interviews underlined that the patients perceived the interventions as useful in terms of increased openness and self-kindness (MBI) as well as altruistic attitudes (PPI).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Although the interventions are distinct, the effects appear to be similar in terms of efficacy and mechanisms of action, apart from a greater behavioral activation in the PPI intervention. The mindfulness based intervention group intervention and the positive psychology group intervention carried out in this study appeared to be adapted to the patients and mostly positive psychology practices were reported to be easily used outside the sessions.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0033298422000590\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0033298422000590","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
方法在法国东南部的一家精神病诊所招募了 27 名中重度抑郁症患者(平均年龄为 44 岁)。他们被随机分配到正念干预(MBI;n = 10)或积极心理学干预(PPI;n = 12)组,并与接受心理教育和经典认知行为情绪调节研讨会的通常治疗(TAU;n = 5)组进行比较。这些干预措施基于现有的经过验证的正念和积极心理学干预措施(MBCT 和 CARE)。参与者在干预前(T1)、干预后(T2)和干预一个月后(T3)分别填写了问卷。这些问卷调查了抑郁症状、绝望感、幸福感、真实可持续的幸福感、心理灵活性、拖延症以及对生活积极方面的关注度。这些数据由在 T2 阶段通过半定向访谈收集的定性数据补充,目的是评估每位参与者在多大程度上认为干预措施有用并适合他们的需要。这些访谈还评估了参与者在多大程度上表达了继续练习所学知识的动机。结果在两种干预措施中,参与者在 T2 阶段都表现出抑郁症状和绝望情绪的减少、幸福感的增强、真实可持续的快乐、心理灵活性以及对生活积极方面的关注,这些在 T3 阶段都得到了保持。只有 PPI 组的拖延症在第二阶段明显减少。只有 TAU 对照组在 T2 阶段的幸福感有了显著提高。半定向访谈的结果强调,患者认为干预措施在提高开放性和自我亲切感(正念干预)以及利他主义态度(正念干预)方面是有用的。本研究中开展的正念干预小组干预和积极心理学小组干预似乎适合患者,据报告,大多数积极心理学实践在疗程之外也很容易使用。
Interventions de pleine conscience et de psychologie positive dans la prise en charge de la dépression : une étude pilote comparative contrôlée
Aims
The aim of this pilot comparative study was to compare the efficacy and the processes of two third wave psychotherapy interventions (a Mindfulness Based Intervention and a Positive Psychology Intervention) in the reduction of moderate to severe depression.
Methods
Twenty-seven patients (mean age = 44 years old) suffering from moderate to severe depression were recruited in a psychiatric clinic in the South-Est of France. They were randomized to either a Mindfulness Based Intervention (MBI; n = 10) or a Positive Psychology Intervention (PPI; n = 12) and compared to a Treatment As Usual (TAU; n = 5) group who benefited from psychoeducational and classical cognitive behavioral emotion regulation workshops. The interventions were based on existing validated mindfulness and positive psychology interventions (MBCT and CARE). Participants completed questionnaires before (T1), after (T2) and one month after the intervention (T3). These questionnaires measured depressive symptoms, hopelessness, well-being, authentic-sustainable happiness, psychological flexibility, procrastination, and attention orientation towards the positive aspects of life. These data were completed by qualitative data collected through semi-directed interviews at T2 in order to assess to what extent each participant had found the intervention useful and adapted to their needs. These interviews also assessed how much participants expressed motivation to continue the practices learnt.
Results
Participants showed reduced depressive symptoms and hopelessness, enhanced well-being, authentic-sustainable happiness, psychological flexibility, and attention orientation towards positive aspects of life at T2 in both interventions, which were maintained at T3. Procrastination significantly decreased at T2 only for the PPI group. The TAU control group only showed a significant increase in well-being at T2. The results from the semi-directed interviews underlined that the patients perceived the interventions as useful in terms of increased openness and self-kindness (MBI) as well as altruistic attitudes (PPI).
Conclusion
Although the interventions are distinct, the effects appear to be similar in terms of efficacy and mechanisms of action, apart from a greater behavioral activation in the PPI intervention. The mindfulness based intervention group intervention and the positive psychology group intervention carried out in this study appeared to be adapted to the patients and mostly positive psychology practices were reported to be easily used outside the sessions.