2018年9月北海道地震电磁前兆及岩石圈-大气-电离层耦合的考虑

M. Hayakawa, A. Rozhnoi, M. Solovieva, Shih-Sian Yang
{"title":"2018年9月北海道地震电磁前兆及岩石圈-大气-电离层耦合的考虑","authors":"M. Hayakawa, A. Rozhnoi, M. Solovieva, Shih-Sian Yang","doi":"10.33665/ijear.2019.v06i01.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Electromagnetic precursors have been investigated for a recent relatively large earthquake (EQ) with magnitude M=6.7 occurred in the Hokkaido Island, Japan on 5 September (UT), 2018 on the basis of coordinated data on the lower ionospheric perturbation with subionospheric VLF/LF propagation anomalies monitored in Japan and in Russia, on the upper F region anomaly with GIM (global ionosphere map) TEC (Total Electron Content) and on the stratospheric behavior with the use of ERA5 temperature profile data. It is found that there were observed the clearest VLF/LF propagation anomalies indicative of seismogenic lower ionospheric perturbations above the EQ epicenter on 4 and 5 September before the EQ and 6 September even after it because this period was geomagnetically quiet. As for the F region, an anomaly in TEC over the EQ epicenter appeared only on 5 September, but it is quite uncertain whether this anomaly is related to either a pre-EQ effect or a geomagnetic storm effect. Then, we have tried to find if there were some seismo-related AGW (atmospheric gravity wave) activities in the stratosphere, but though we have found a lot of anomalies, they are highly likely to be associated with the activities by convective weather systems. Even though we have recently identified the first convincing direct evidence on the Atmospheric oscillation hypothesis in the lithosphere-atmosphere-ionosphere coupling (LAIC) mechanism for the 2016 Kumamoto EQ [Yang et al., 2019], this paper aimed initially to obtain further evidence on this channel. However, the above experimental findings may provide a negative result in this direction; that is, this Atmospheric oscillation channel is unlikely to be in operation for the present 2018 Hokkaido EQ, suggesting other channels in the LAIC effect. So we have made extensive discussions on this LAIC mechanism for this Hokkaido EQ with special reference to the 2016 Kumamoto EQ and the 2011 Tohoku EQ. https://doi.org/10.33665/IJEAR.2019.v06i01.003 International Journal of Electronics and Applied Research (IJEAR) vol. 6, issue 1, June 2019 Online (http://eses.net.in/online_journal.html) ISSN 2395-0064 _____________________________________________________________________________________ Copyright @ESES IJEAR","PeriodicalId":249119,"journal":{"name":"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ELECTRONICS AND APPLIED RESEARCH","volume":"281 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On electromagnetic precursors to the Hokkaido earthquake in September, 2018 and consideration of lithosphere-atmosphere-ionosphere coupling\",\"authors\":\"M. Hayakawa, A. Rozhnoi, M. Solovieva, Shih-Sian Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.33665/ijear.2019.v06i01.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Electromagnetic precursors have been investigated for a recent relatively large earthquake (EQ) with magnitude M=6.7 occurred in the Hokkaido Island, Japan on 5 September (UT), 2018 on the basis of coordinated data on the lower ionospheric perturbation with subionospheric VLF/LF propagation anomalies monitored in Japan and in Russia, on the upper F region anomaly with GIM (global ionosphere map) TEC (Total Electron Content) and on the stratospheric behavior with the use of ERA5 temperature profile data. It is found that there were observed the clearest VLF/LF propagation anomalies indicative of seismogenic lower ionospheric perturbations above the EQ epicenter on 4 and 5 September before the EQ and 6 September even after it because this period was geomagnetically quiet. As for the F region, an anomaly in TEC over the EQ epicenter appeared only on 5 September, but it is quite uncertain whether this anomaly is related to either a pre-EQ effect or a geomagnetic storm effect. Then, we have tried to find if there were some seismo-related AGW (atmospheric gravity wave) activities in the stratosphere, but though we have found a lot of anomalies, they are highly likely to be associated with the activities by convective weather systems. Even though we have recently identified the first convincing direct evidence on the Atmospheric oscillation hypothesis in the lithosphere-atmosphere-ionosphere coupling (LAIC) mechanism for the 2016 Kumamoto EQ [Yang et al., 2019], this paper aimed initially to obtain further evidence on this channel. However, the above experimental findings may provide a negative result in this direction; that is, this Atmospheric oscillation channel is unlikely to be in operation for the present 2018 Hokkaido EQ, suggesting other channels in the LAIC effect. So we have made extensive discussions on this LAIC mechanism for this Hokkaido EQ with special reference to the 2016 Kumamoto EQ and the 2011 Tohoku EQ. https://doi.org/10.33665/IJEAR.2019.v06i01.003 International Journal of Electronics and Applied Research (IJEAR) vol. 6, issue 1, June 2019 Online (http://eses.net.in/online_journal.html) ISSN 2395-0064 _____________________________________________________________________________________ Copyright @ESES IJEAR\",\"PeriodicalId\":249119,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ELECTRONICS AND APPLIED RESEARCH\",\"volume\":\"281 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ELECTRONICS AND APPLIED RESEARCH\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33665/ijear.2019.v06i01.003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ELECTRONICS AND APPLIED RESEARCH","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33665/ijear.2019.v06i01.003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

基于在日本和俄罗斯监测到的电离层下扰动与亚层VLF/LF传播异常的协调数据,研究了2018年9月5日(UT)发生在日本北海道岛的最近一次M=6.7级的相对大地震(EQ)的电磁前兆。利用GIM(全球电离层图)TEC(总电子含量)和ERA5温度剖面资料分析F区上部异常和平流层行为。结果发现,在9月4日和5日以及9月6日(甚至在9月6日之后),由于这一时期地磁平静,在EQ震中上方观测到最明显的VLF/LF传播异常,这表明EQ震中上方的低电离层摄动具有孕震作用。至于F区,仅在9月5日才出现了EQ震中上方的TEC异常,但这一异常是与EQ前效应还是地磁风暴效应有关尚不确定。然后,我们试图寻找平流层是否存在一些与地震相关的大气重力波活动,但尽管我们发现了很多异常,但它们极有可能与对流天气系统的活动有关。尽管我们最近已经确定了2016熊本EQ的岩石圈-大气-电离层耦合(LAIC)机制中大气振荡假说的第一个令人信服的直接证据[Yang等人,2019],但本文最初的目的是获得关于该通道的进一步证据。然而,上述实验结果可能在这个方向上提供否定的结果;也就是说,这个大气振荡通道不太可能在目前的2018年北海道EQ中运行,这表明在LAIC效应中存在其他通道。因此,我们对北海道EQ的LAIC机制进行了广泛的讨论,并特别参考了2016年熊本EQ和2011年东北EQ. https://doi.org/10.33665/IJEAR.2019.v06i01.003国际电子与应用研究杂志(IJEAR)第6卷,第1期,2019年6月在线(http://eses.net.in/online_journal.html) ISSN 2395-0064 _____________________________________________________________________________________版权所有@ESES IJEAR
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
On electromagnetic precursors to the Hokkaido earthquake in September, 2018 and consideration of lithosphere-atmosphere-ionosphere coupling
Electromagnetic precursors have been investigated for a recent relatively large earthquake (EQ) with magnitude M=6.7 occurred in the Hokkaido Island, Japan on 5 September (UT), 2018 on the basis of coordinated data on the lower ionospheric perturbation with subionospheric VLF/LF propagation anomalies monitored in Japan and in Russia, on the upper F region anomaly with GIM (global ionosphere map) TEC (Total Electron Content) and on the stratospheric behavior with the use of ERA5 temperature profile data. It is found that there were observed the clearest VLF/LF propagation anomalies indicative of seismogenic lower ionospheric perturbations above the EQ epicenter on 4 and 5 September before the EQ and 6 September even after it because this period was geomagnetically quiet. As for the F region, an anomaly in TEC over the EQ epicenter appeared only on 5 September, but it is quite uncertain whether this anomaly is related to either a pre-EQ effect or a geomagnetic storm effect. Then, we have tried to find if there were some seismo-related AGW (atmospheric gravity wave) activities in the stratosphere, but though we have found a lot of anomalies, they are highly likely to be associated with the activities by convective weather systems. Even though we have recently identified the first convincing direct evidence on the Atmospheric oscillation hypothesis in the lithosphere-atmosphere-ionosphere coupling (LAIC) mechanism for the 2016 Kumamoto EQ [Yang et al., 2019], this paper aimed initially to obtain further evidence on this channel. However, the above experimental findings may provide a negative result in this direction; that is, this Atmospheric oscillation channel is unlikely to be in operation for the present 2018 Hokkaido EQ, suggesting other channels in the LAIC effect. So we have made extensive discussions on this LAIC mechanism for this Hokkaido EQ with special reference to the 2016 Kumamoto EQ and the 2011 Tohoku EQ. https://doi.org/10.33665/IJEAR.2019.v06i01.003 International Journal of Electronics and Applied Research (IJEAR) vol. 6, issue 1, June 2019 Online (http://eses.net.in/online_journal.html) ISSN 2395-0064 _____________________________________________________________________________________ Copyright @ESES IJEAR
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信