我院腹腔镜胆囊切除术的临床审计

Noreen Kousar, M. Ghafoor, Muhammad Iqbal, M. Tariq
{"title":"我院腹腔镜胆囊切除术的临床审计","authors":"Noreen Kousar, M. Ghafoor, Muhammad Iqbal, M. Tariq","doi":"10.47883/JSZMC.V11I01.15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT \nBackground: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has replaced open surgery in the treatment of symptomatic cholecystolithiasis. \nObjective: To evaluate the clinical practices and outcome of laparoscopic cholecystectomy at our institute. \nMethodology: This was a cross sectional study, conducted at Surgical Unit II, Sheikh Zayed Hospital, Rahim yar khan, from November 2018 to October 2019. Sample size: 100 patients undergoing standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy selected by non probability sampling. All the patients of laparoscopic cholecystectomy  during the study period having a clinical diagnosis of acute and chronic cholecystitis were included, whereas patients who had previously undergone midline abdominal operations, ventral hernias, with evidence of common bile duct pathology, having bleeding disorders and hepatitis were excluded. Study variables were operating time, duration of hospital stay, frequency of operative and post-operative complications. \nResults: There were 85 females and 15 males. Mean age was 40 ± 1.2 years. In this study, 68% patients were having chronic cholecystitis due to cholelithiasis whereas 32% were having acute cholecystitis. Abdominal ultrasound showed multiple stones in 82% and single stone in 18% patients. Adhesions in 30%, Mucocele in 1% and empyema in 2%  patients was reported. Gall bladder was perforated in 12% patients and 8% patients converted to open procedure. The mean operative time for laparoscopic cholecystectomy was 71.2+ 2.6 minute. The post operative complications were; wound infection in 4%, shoulder pain 1%   and surgical emphysema 1%. The mean hospital stay was 1.38 days. \nConclusion: Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy proved a safe procedure in term of operative and post operative complications in our setup.","PeriodicalId":171893,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sheikh Zayed Medical College","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Clinical Practice Audit of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy at our Institute\",\"authors\":\"Noreen Kousar, M. Ghafoor, Muhammad Iqbal, M. Tariq\",\"doi\":\"10.47883/JSZMC.V11I01.15\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT \\nBackground: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has replaced open surgery in the treatment of symptomatic cholecystolithiasis. \\nObjective: To evaluate the clinical practices and outcome of laparoscopic cholecystectomy at our institute. \\nMethodology: This was a cross sectional study, conducted at Surgical Unit II, Sheikh Zayed Hospital, Rahim yar khan, from November 2018 to October 2019. Sample size: 100 patients undergoing standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy selected by non probability sampling. All the patients of laparoscopic cholecystectomy  during the study period having a clinical diagnosis of acute and chronic cholecystitis were included, whereas patients who had previously undergone midline abdominal operations, ventral hernias, with evidence of common bile duct pathology, having bleeding disorders and hepatitis were excluded. Study variables were operating time, duration of hospital stay, frequency of operative and post-operative complications. \\nResults: There were 85 females and 15 males. Mean age was 40 ± 1.2 years. In this study, 68% patients were having chronic cholecystitis due to cholelithiasis whereas 32% were having acute cholecystitis. Abdominal ultrasound showed multiple stones in 82% and single stone in 18% patients. Adhesions in 30%, Mucocele in 1% and empyema in 2%  patients was reported. Gall bladder was perforated in 12% patients and 8% patients converted to open procedure. The mean operative time for laparoscopic cholecystectomy was 71.2+ 2.6 minute. The post operative complications were; wound infection in 4%, shoulder pain 1%   and surgical emphysema 1%. The mean hospital stay was 1.38 days. \\nConclusion: Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy proved a safe procedure in term of operative and post operative complications in our setup.\",\"PeriodicalId\":171893,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Sheikh Zayed Medical College\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Sheikh Zayed Medical College\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47883/JSZMC.V11I01.15\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sheikh Zayed Medical College","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47883/JSZMC.V11I01.15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:腹腔镜胆囊切除术已取代开放手术治疗症状性胆囊结石。目的:评价我院腹腔镜胆囊切除术的临床应用及效果。方法:这是一项横断面研究,于2018年11月至2019年10月在拉希姆亚尔汗谢赫扎耶德医院第二外科进行。样本量:采用非概率抽样法选取100例标准腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者。纳入研究期间所有临床诊断为急慢性胆囊炎的腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者,排除既往行腹部中线手术、腹疝、胆总管病理证据、有出血性疾病和肝炎的患者。研究变量包括手术时间、住院时间、手术频率和术后并发症。结果:女性85例,男性15例。平均年龄40±1.2岁。在这项研究中,68%的患者因胆石症而患有慢性胆囊炎,而32%的患者患有急性胆囊炎。腹部超声显示多发结石82%,单发结石18%。粘连发生率为30%,粘液囊肿发生率为1%,脓胸发生率为2%。12%的患者胆囊穿孔,8%的患者转为开腹手术。腹腔镜胆囊切除术平均手术时间为71.2+ 2.6分钟。术后并发症有;伤口感染4%,肩痛1%,手术肺气肿1%。平均住院时间为1.38天。结论:腹腔镜胆囊切除术在手术和术后并发症方面是一种安全的手术方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Clinical Practice Audit of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy at our Institute
ABSTRACT Background: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has replaced open surgery in the treatment of symptomatic cholecystolithiasis. Objective: To evaluate the clinical practices and outcome of laparoscopic cholecystectomy at our institute. Methodology: This was a cross sectional study, conducted at Surgical Unit II, Sheikh Zayed Hospital, Rahim yar khan, from November 2018 to October 2019. Sample size: 100 patients undergoing standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy selected by non probability sampling. All the patients of laparoscopic cholecystectomy  during the study period having a clinical diagnosis of acute and chronic cholecystitis were included, whereas patients who had previously undergone midline abdominal operations, ventral hernias, with evidence of common bile duct pathology, having bleeding disorders and hepatitis were excluded. Study variables were operating time, duration of hospital stay, frequency of operative and post-operative complications. Results: There were 85 females and 15 males. Mean age was 40 ± 1.2 years. In this study, 68% patients were having chronic cholecystitis due to cholelithiasis whereas 32% were having acute cholecystitis. Abdominal ultrasound showed multiple stones in 82% and single stone in 18% patients. Adhesions in 30%, Mucocele in 1% and empyema in 2%  patients was reported. Gall bladder was perforated in 12% patients and 8% patients converted to open procedure. The mean operative time for laparoscopic cholecystectomy was 71.2+ 2.6 minute. The post operative complications were; wound infection in 4%, shoulder pain 1%   and surgical emphysema 1%. The mean hospital stay was 1.38 days. Conclusion: Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy proved a safe procedure in term of operative and post operative complications in our setup.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信