考察文化价值观和语义启动在精英认知和水力压裂效用评估中的作用

Rachael M. Moyer
{"title":"考察文化价值观和语义启动在精英认知和水力压裂效用评估中的作用","authors":"Rachael M. Moyer","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3855520","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Hydraulic fracturing is a highly technical method for accessing unconventional sources of oil and gas. Despite being perceived by some as promising and innovative, the technique remains highly controversial in the U.S. Uncertainties regarding the consequences of its use and contested issue frames support entrenched policy debates around this issue. This research investigates local policy elites’ perception of the utility of hydraulic fracturing using original survey data (n=322). The study examines how culturally-biased values and aspects of issue frames are used by policy elites to think about and assess this issue.","PeriodicalId":301526,"journal":{"name":"Sociology of Innovation eJournal","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Examining the Role of Cultural Values and Semantic Priming in Elite Cognition and Utility Assessment of Hydraulic Fracturing\",\"authors\":\"Rachael M. Moyer\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3855520\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Hydraulic fracturing is a highly technical method for accessing unconventional sources of oil and gas. Despite being perceived by some as promising and innovative, the technique remains highly controversial in the U.S. Uncertainties regarding the consequences of its use and contested issue frames support entrenched policy debates around this issue. This research investigates local policy elites’ perception of the utility of hydraulic fracturing using original survey data (n=322). The study examines how culturally-biased values and aspects of issue frames are used by policy elites to think about and assess this issue.\",\"PeriodicalId\":301526,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sociology of Innovation eJournal\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sociology of Innovation eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3855520\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociology of Innovation eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3855520","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

水力压裂是一种获取非常规油气资源的高技术方法。尽管被一些人认为是有前途和创新的,但该技术在美国仍然存在高度争议。关于其使用后果的不确定性和有争议的问题框架支持围绕该问题的根深蒂固的政策辩论。本研究使用原始调查数据(n=322)调查了当地政策精英对水力压裂效用的看法。该研究考察了政策精英如何使用具有文化偏见的价值观和问题框架的各个方面来思考和评估这一问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Examining the Role of Cultural Values and Semantic Priming in Elite Cognition and Utility Assessment of Hydraulic Fracturing
Hydraulic fracturing is a highly technical method for accessing unconventional sources of oil and gas. Despite being perceived by some as promising and innovative, the technique remains highly controversial in the U.S. Uncertainties regarding the consequences of its use and contested issue frames support entrenched policy debates around this issue. This research investigates local policy elites’ perception of the utility of hydraulic fracturing using original survey data (n=322). The study examines how culturally-biased values and aspects of issue frames are used by policy elites to think about and assess this issue.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信