{"title":"由微波发射和太阳透射测量测定的柱状水蒸气的比较","authors":"R. Peter, B. Schmid","doi":"10.1109/COMEAS.1993.700218","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Water vapor and liquid water (clouds) play a major role in remote sensing applications as ground-based mm-wave spectroscopy (Peter and Ksmpfer, 1991, Kknpfer et al. 1991) and communications due to their effect on the propagation of electromagnetic waves. Since the columnar water vapor or integrated precipitable water vapor IWV and the liquid water content ILW in the troposphere are highly variable in time and space only continuous measurements of these quantities can provide adequate corrections for remote sensing observations. Dual channel microwave instruments (20/30 GHz) measuring the atmospheric emission, are well known for their capability to measure continuously IWV and ILW also during night and cloudy conditions (Guiraud et al., 1979, Westwater, 1978 and Elgered et al. 1982). The same capability is attributed to photometers measuring the absorption of the radiation of the sun in the range of 350 1000 nm, however only during clear sky conditions. During half a year simultaneous measurements of both types of instruments have been performed in order to validate the accuracy of both instruments as well as to estimate the retrieval quality depending on the used emission (MW) and absorption (IR/Vis) models included in the IWV retrieval algorithms. The retrieved IWV from the water vapor radiometer (WVR) and the sun photometer (SPM) exhibiting a rms scatter of about 9 % (SPM) and 13 % (WVR) show a good agreement with radiosonde data taken a t noon. Between both instruments with independently retrieved IWV, the comparison yielded a mean IWV difference of 1.6 mm (10 %) and a rms scatter of 1.3 mm (8 %) for the whole periode of observation. Thus the rms is lower between the WVR and the SPM than with the radiosonde data, while the difference of the mean between both instruments is higher, reflecting possible calibration offsets or inconsistencies in the MW emission or IR/Vis absorption model. I) Microwave measurements","PeriodicalId":379014,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of IEEE Topical Symposium on Combined Optical, Microwave, Earth and Atmosphere Sensing","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison Of Columnar Water Vapor Determined From Microwave Emmision And Solar Transmission Measurements\",\"authors\":\"R. Peter, B. Schmid\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/COMEAS.1993.700218\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Water vapor and liquid water (clouds) play a major role in remote sensing applications as ground-based mm-wave spectroscopy (Peter and Ksmpfer, 1991, Kknpfer et al. 1991) and communications due to their effect on the propagation of electromagnetic waves. Since the columnar water vapor or integrated precipitable water vapor IWV and the liquid water content ILW in the troposphere are highly variable in time and space only continuous measurements of these quantities can provide adequate corrections for remote sensing observations. Dual channel microwave instruments (20/30 GHz) measuring the atmospheric emission, are well known for their capability to measure continuously IWV and ILW also during night and cloudy conditions (Guiraud et al., 1979, Westwater, 1978 and Elgered et al. 1982). The same capability is attributed to photometers measuring the absorption of the radiation of the sun in the range of 350 1000 nm, however only during clear sky conditions. During half a year simultaneous measurements of both types of instruments have been performed in order to validate the accuracy of both instruments as well as to estimate the retrieval quality depending on the used emission (MW) and absorption (IR/Vis) models included in the IWV retrieval algorithms. The retrieved IWV from the water vapor radiometer (WVR) and the sun photometer (SPM) exhibiting a rms scatter of about 9 % (SPM) and 13 % (WVR) show a good agreement with radiosonde data taken a t noon. Between both instruments with independently retrieved IWV, the comparison yielded a mean IWV difference of 1.6 mm (10 %) and a rms scatter of 1.3 mm (8 %) for the whole periode of observation. Thus the rms is lower between the WVR and the SPM than with the radiosonde data, while the difference of the mean between both instruments is higher, reflecting possible calibration offsets or inconsistencies in the MW emission or IR/Vis absorption model. I) Microwave measurements\",\"PeriodicalId\":379014,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of IEEE Topical Symposium on Combined Optical, Microwave, Earth and Atmosphere Sensing\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1993-03-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of IEEE Topical Symposium on Combined Optical, Microwave, Earth and Atmosphere Sensing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/COMEAS.1993.700218\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of IEEE Topical Symposium on Combined Optical, Microwave, Earth and Atmosphere Sensing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/COMEAS.1993.700218","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
摘要
水蒸气和液态水(云)在遥感应用中发挥着重要作用,如地面毫米波波谱(Peter and Ksmpfer, 1991, Kknpfer et al. 1991)和通信,因为它们对电磁波的传播有影响。由于对流层的柱状水汽或综合可降水水汽IWV和液态水含量iww在时间和空间上变化很大,只有对这些量的连续测量才能为遥感观测提供足够的校正。测量大气发射的双通道微波仪器(20/30 GHz)以其在夜间和多云条件下连续测量IWV和ILW的能力而闻名(Guiraud等人,1979年,Westwater, 1978年和Elgered等人,1982年)。测量350 - 1000纳米范围内太阳辐射吸收量的光度计也具有同样的能力,但仅在晴朗的天空条件下。在半年的时间里,对两种类型的仪器进行了同时测量,以验证两种仪器的准确性,并根据IWV检索算法中包括的使用的发射(MW)和吸收(IR/Vis)模型估计检索质量。从水汽辐射计(WVR)和太阳光度计(SPM)反演的IWV显示出9% (SPM)和13% (WVR)的均数散射,与探空仪在中午采集的数据吻合良好。在两种仪器独立检索的IWV之间,比较得出整个观察期间的平均IWV差异为1.6 mm(10%),均方根散射为1.3 mm(8%)。因此,WVR和SPM之间的均方根值低于探空数据,而两种仪器之间的平均值差异较大,反映了可能的校准偏移或MW发射或IR/Vis吸收模型的不一致。I)微波测量
Comparison Of Columnar Water Vapor Determined From Microwave Emmision And Solar Transmission Measurements
Water vapor and liquid water (clouds) play a major role in remote sensing applications as ground-based mm-wave spectroscopy (Peter and Ksmpfer, 1991, Kknpfer et al. 1991) and communications due to their effect on the propagation of electromagnetic waves. Since the columnar water vapor or integrated precipitable water vapor IWV and the liquid water content ILW in the troposphere are highly variable in time and space only continuous measurements of these quantities can provide adequate corrections for remote sensing observations. Dual channel microwave instruments (20/30 GHz) measuring the atmospheric emission, are well known for their capability to measure continuously IWV and ILW also during night and cloudy conditions (Guiraud et al., 1979, Westwater, 1978 and Elgered et al. 1982). The same capability is attributed to photometers measuring the absorption of the radiation of the sun in the range of 350 1000 nm, however only during clear sky conditions. During half a year simultaneous measurements of both types of instruments have been performed in order to validate the accuracy of both instruments as well as to estimate the retrieval quality depending on the used emission (MW) and absorption (IR/Vis) models included in the IWV retrieval algorithms. The retrieved IWV from the water vapor radiometer (WVR) and the sun photometer (SPM) exhibiting a rms scatter of about 9 % (SPM) and 13 % (WVR) show a good agreement with radiosonde data taken a t noon. Between both instruments with independently retrieved IWV, the comparison yielded a mean IWV difference of 1.6 mm (10 %) and a rms scatter of 1.3 mm (8 %) for the whole periode of observation. Thus the rms is lower between the WVR and the SPM than with the radiosonde data, while the difference of the mean between both instruments is higher, reflecting possible calibration offsets or inconsistencies in the MW emission or IR/Vis absorption model. I) Microwave measurements