补贴与非补贴JKN患者满意度的差异:以班图尔某医院为例的定量分析方法

Yanasta Yudo Pratama, M. Hidayat, T. Marwati, Lina Handayani
{"title":"补贴与非补贴JKN患者满意度的差异:以班图尔某医院为例的定量分析方法","authors":"Yanasta Yudo Pratama, M. Hidayat, T. Marwati, Lina Handayani","doi":"10.22146/ahj.v4i1.71744","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTIntroduction: The National Health Insurance (JKN) organized by BPJS is a guarantee in the form of health protection so that participants get the benefits of health checks and protection in meeting basic health needs given to everyone. Measuring the level of patient satisfaction is needed to determine the level of service provided by a service provider. To identify differences in the satisfaction of JKN class 3 PBI patients and JKN class 3 non PBI patients who received health services at the place research.Materials and Methods: This study used an analytical observational research design with a cross sectional method through a Quantitative Method approach. Data obtained by using questionnaires and interviews with respondents. The level of patient satisfaction was analyzed using GAP scores, CSI, and Independent Samples T Test.Results: The results of the GAP score indicate that JKN class 3 PBI patients have the lowest GAP score on the reliability dimension, which is -0.1733 and the highest GAP score on the assurance dimension with a score of -0.0875. Meanwhile, JKN class 3 non-PBI patients had the lowest score on the tangibles dimension with -0.1955 and the highest on the reliability dimension with -0.1711. JKN class 3 PBI patients had a CSI score of 69.81% and JKN class 3 non-PBI patients had 66.938%. If statistically tested, there is a significant difference between JKN class 3 PBI patients and JKN class 3 non-PBI patients with p value < 0.05.Conclusion: From the results of the analysis, at the placed research patients are generally satisfied with the services provided. JKN class 3 PBI patients feel more satisfied than JKN class 3 non PBI patients.","PeriodicalId":271282,"journal":{"name":"Academic Hospital Journal","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differences in Satisfaction Level between Subsidised JKN Patients and Non-Subsidised JKN Patients: A Case Study in a Hospital in Bantul with Quantitative Analysis Approach\",\"authors\":\"Yanasta Yudo Pratama, M. Hidayat, T. Marwati, Lina Handayani\",\"doi\":\"10.22146/ahj.v4i1.71744\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACTIntroduction: The National Health Insurance (JKN) organized by BPJS is a guarantee in the form of health protection so that participants get the benefits of health checks and protection in meeting basic health needs given to everyone. Measuring the level of patient satisfaction is needed to determine the level of service provided by a service provider. To identify differences in the satisfaction of JKN class 3 PBI patients and JKN class 3 non PBI patients who received health services at the place research.Materials and Methods: This study used an analytical observational research design with a cross sectional method through a Quantitative Method approach. Data obtained by using questionnaires and interviews with respondents. The level of patient satisfaction was analyzed using GAP scores, CSI, and Independent Samples T Test.Results: The results of the GAP score indicate that JKN class 3 PBI patients have the lowest GAP score on the reliability dimension, which is -0.1733 and the highest GAP score on the assurance dimension with a score of -0.0875. Meanwhile, JKN class 3 non-PBI patients had the lowest score on the tangibles dimension with -0.1955 and the highest on the reliability dimension with -0.1711. JKN class 3 PBI patients had a CSI score of 69.81% and JKN class 3 non-PBI patients had 66.938%. If statistically tested, there is a significant difference between JKN class 3 PBI patients and JKN class 3 non-PBI patients with p value < 0.05.Conclusion: From the results of the analysis, at the placed research patients are generally satisfied with the services provided. JKN class 3 PBI patients feel more satisfied than JKN class 3 non PBI patients.\",\"PeriodicalId\":271282,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Academic Hospital Journal\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Academic Hospital Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22146/ahj.v4i1.71744\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Hospital Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22146/ahj.v4i1.71744","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

【摘要】简介:BPJS组织的国民健康保险(JKN)是以健康保障的形式,使参保者在满足每个人的基本健康需求的基础上,获得健康检查和保障的利益。衡量病人的满意度水平是确定服务提供者提供的服务水平的必要条件。目的探讨JKN 3级PBI患者与JKN 3级非PBI患者在现场接受卫生服务的满意度差异。材料与方法:本研究采用定量方法的横断面分析观察研究设计。通过问卷调查和受访者访谈获得的数据。采用GAP评分、CSI和独立样本T检验分析患者满意度水平。结果:GAP评分结果显示,JKN 3级PBI患者在信度维度上GAP得分最低,为-0.1733;在保证维度上GAP得分最高,为-0.0875。JKN 3级非pbi患者有形维度得分最低,为-0.1955,信度维度得分最高,为-0.1711。JKN 3级PBI患者CSI评分为69.81%,JKN 3级非PBI患者CSI评分为66.938%。经统计学检验,JKN 3级PBI患者与JKN 3级非PBI患者之间差异有统计学意义,p值< 0.05。结论:从分析结果来看,被调查患者对所提供的服务总体上是满意的。JKN 3级PBI患者满意度高于JKN 3级非PBI患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Differences in Satisfaction Level between Subsidised JKN Patients and Non-Subsidised JKN Patients: A Case Study in a Hospital in Bantul with Quantitative Analysis Approach
ABSTRACTIntroduction: The National Health Insurance (JKN) organized by BPJS is a guarantee in the form of health protection so that participants get the benefits of health checks and protection in meeting basic health needs given to everyone. Measuring the level of patient satisfaction is needed to determine the level of service provided by a service provider. To identify differences in the satisfaction of JKN class 3 PBI patients and JKN class 3 non PBI patients who received health services at the place research.Materials and Methods: This study used an analytical observational research design with a cross sectional method through a Quantitative Method approach. Data obtained by using questionnaires and interviews with respondents. The level of patient satisfaction was analyzed using GAP scores, CSI, and Independent Samples T Test.Results: The results of the GAP score indicate that JKN class 3 PBI patients have the lowest GAP score on the reliability dimension, which is -0.1733 and the highest GAP score on the assurance dimension with a score of -0.0875. Meanwhile, JKN class 3 non-PBI patients had the lowest score on the tangibles dimension with -0.1955 and the highest on the reliability dimension with -0.1711. JKN class 3 PBI patients had a CSI score of 69.81% and JKN class 3 non-PBI patients had 66.938%. If statistically tested, there is a significant difference between JKN class 3 PBI patients and JKN class 3 non-PBI patients with p value < 0.05.Conclusion: From the results of the analysis, at the placed research patients are generally satisfied with the services provided. JKN class 3 PBI patients feel more satisfied than JKN class 3 non PBI patients.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信