在新冠肺炎疫情期间,通过两阶段概念库存测验,促进学生参与和学习在线和Flex交付的热力学课程

Zahra Sadeghizadeh
{"title":"在新冠肺炎疫情期间,通过两阶段概念库存测验,促进学生参与和学习在线和Flex交付的热力学课程","authors":"Zahra Sadeghizadeh","doi":"10.1115/imece2021-70778","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The COVID-19 pandemic has required many engineering programs to design and deliver their courses in more flexible formats, including courses that involve teaching students who are participating remotely and face-to-face at the same time (flex courses). However, in the meantime, it is essential to ensure that students are remaining actively engaged in the learning process and that their remote presence is not negatively affecting their conceptual understating of the course materials. The objective of this study was to use concept inventory in the format of a two-stage quiz to investigate how this format impacts students’ performance and engagement in both online and flex delivery modes. During two-stage quizzes, students first work on conceptual problems individually and then collaborates in groups that are remote or hybrid. This approach applied for two sections of an Engineering Thermodynamics class, one delivered in flex dual-mode format and one fully online. It was interesting to see how the level of confidence and students’ perception to answer conceptual questions including misconceptions, change as they interact in different forms of teams. The statistical analysis shows there is no significant difference between online and flex mode results, however students confidence level in answering concept-based questions increases significantly in group answers for both modalities. Additionally, an anonymous survey was developed to receive student’s perceptions and feedback about their learning experience.","PeriodicalId":187039,"journal":{"name":"Volume 9: Engineering Education","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fostering Student Engagement and Learning in Online and Flex Delivered Thermodynamics Courses via Two-Stage Concept Inventory Quizzes in Time of COVID\",\"authors\":\"Zahra Sadeghizadeh\",\"doi\":\"10.1115/imece2021-70778\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n The COVID-19 pandemic has required many engineering programs to design and deliver their courses in more flexible formats, including courses that involve teaching students who are participating remotely and face-to-face at the same time (flex courses). However, in the meantime, it is essential to ensure that students are remaining actively engaged in the learning process and that their remote presence is not negatively affecting their conceptual understating of the course materials. The objective of this study was to use concept inventory in the format of a two-stage quiz to investigate how this format impacts students’ performance and engagement in both online and flex delivery modes. During two-stage quizzes, students first work on conceptual problems individually and then collaborates in groups that are remote or hybrid. This approach applied for two sections of an Engineering Thermodynamics class, one delivered in flex dual-mode format and one fully online. It was interesting to see how the level of confidence and students’ perception to answer conceptual questions including misconceptions, change as they interact in different forms of teams. The statistical analysis shows there is no significant difference between online and flex mode results, however students confidence level in answering concept-based questions increases significantly in group answers for both modalities. Additionally, an anonymous survey was developed to receive student’s perceptions and feedback about their learning experience.\",\"PeriodicalId\":187039,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Volume 9: Engineering Education\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Volume 9: Engineering Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1115/imece2021-70778\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 9: Engineering Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/imece2021-70778","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

COVID-19大流行要求许多工程项目以更灵活的形式设计和提供课程,包括同时教授远程和面对面参与的学生的课程(灵活课程)。然而,与此同时,确保学生在学习过程中保持积极参与是至关重要的,并且他们的远程存在不会对他们对课程材料的概念理解产生负面影响。本研究的目的是使用两阶段测验形式的概念清单来调查这种形式如何影响学生在在线和灵活交付模式下的表现和参与度。在两阶段的测试中,学生们首先单独解决概念问题,然后在远程或混合的小组中合作。这种方法应用于工程热力学课程的两个部分,一个是柔性双模式格式,另一个是完全在线的。有趣的是,当他们在不同形式的团队中互动时,他们的自信水平和学生回答概念性问题(包括误解)的看法是如何变化的。统计分析表明,在线和灵活模式的结果没有显著差异,但学生在回答概念问题时的信心水平在两种模式下的小组回答中都有显著提高。此外,还开展了一项匿名调查,以接收学生对其学习经历的看法和反馈。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Fostering Student Engagement and Learning in Online and Flex Delivered Thermodynamics Courses via Two-Stage Concept Inventory Quizzes in Time of COVID
The COVID-19 pandemic has required many engineering programs to design and deliver their courses in more flexible formats, including courses that involve teaching students who are participating remotely and face-to-face at the same time (flex courses). However, in the meantime, it is essential to ensure that students are remaining actively engaged in the learning process and that their remote presence is not negatively affecting their conceptual understating of the course materials. The objective of this study was to use concept inventory in the format of a two-stage quiz to investigate how this format impacts students’ performance and engagement in both online and flex delivery modes. During two-stage quizzes, students first work on conceptual problems individually and then collaborates in groups that are remote or hybrid. This approach applied for two sections of an Engineering Thermodynamics class, one delivered in flex dual-mode format and one fully online. It was interesting to see how the level of confidence and students’ perception to answer conceptual questions including misconceptions, change as they interact in different forms of teams. The statistical analysis shows there is no significant difference between online and flex mode results, however students confidence level in answering concept-based questions increases significantly in group answers for both modalities. Additionally, an anonymous survey was developed to receive student’s perceptions and feedback about their learning experience.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信